Cargando…

Acute Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: Urgent Surgery versus Radiotherapy and Treatment Result Prediction versus Actual Results

Background Context: The role of radiotherapy versus surgery in treating acute metastatic spinal cord compression (AMSCC) has changed over the years. Purpose: Our study evaluates neurological and functional outcomes following urgent surgery and radiotherapy (USFR) versus urgent radiotherapy alone in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hershkovich, Oded, Sakhnini, Mojahed, Gara, Sharif, Caspi, Israel, Lotan, Raphael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36290860
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29100583
_version_ 1784817016686772224
author Hershkovich, Oded
Sakhnini, Mojahed
Gara, Sharif
Caspi, Israel
Lotan, Raphael
author_facet Hershkovich, Oded
Sakhnini, Mojahed
Gara, Sharif
Caspi, Israel
Lotan, Raphael
author_sort Hershkovich, Oded
collection PubMed
description Background Context: The role of radiotherapy versus surgery in treating acute metastatic spinal cord compression (AMSCC) has changed over the years. Purpose: Our study evaluates neurological and functional outcomes following urgent surgery and radiotherapy (USFR) versus urgent radiotherapy alone in treating AMSCC. Study Design/Setting: A retrospective cohort of 54 patients with AMSCC with variable neurological deficits. Overall, 32 patients were treated with USFR, and 22 received urgent radiotherapy alone. Outcome Measures: Neurological status regarding the Asia and Frankel scores, continence and ambulation, and Kranofsky’s functional score and patient life span comprised the outcome measures. Methods: This was a retrospective EMR study. Results: USFR and radiotherapy cohorts were similar in age, gender, tumor origin, and the number of spinal metastases. The most common cause of AMSCC was carcinoma of the breast (24.1%), followed by carcinoma of the lung (16.7%) and multiple myeloma (13%). Neurological status at AMSCC presentation was similar between cohorts regarding Asia and Frankel scores, continence and ambulation, and Kranofsky’s functional score. Following USFR, 59.3% of the patients had a motor strength improvement, 31.3% regained sphincter function, and 34.4% regained ambulation, while 90% of the patients treated by radiotherapy did not show any improvement. One patient under radiotherapy lost sphincter function. The treatment received did not affect the patient’s survival. A subanalysis of patients with a short life expectancy, by Tomita and Tokuhashi scores, showed missed prediction in 29.4% of cases. Conclusion: The study supports the beneficial effect of UFSR compared to urgent radiotherapy alone in treating AMSCC in all subgroups. Early surgery improved function, motor strength, sphincter control, and ambulation without affecting life span. Prognostic scores failed to predict life span in almost one-third of the patients, requiring further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9601261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96012612022-10-27 Acute Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: Urgent Surgery versus Radiotherapy and Treatment Result Prediction versus Actual Results Hershkovich, Oded Sakhnini, Mojahed Gara, Sharif Caspi, Israel Lotan, Raphael Curr Oncol Article Background Context: The role of radiotherapy versus surgery in treating acute metastatic spinal cord compression (AMSCC) has changed over the years. Purpose: Our study evaluates neurological and functional outcomes following urgent surgery and radiotherapy (USFR) versus urgent radiotherapy alone in treating AMSCC. Study Design/Setting: A retrospective cohort of 54 patients with AMSCC with variable neurological deficits. Overall, 32 patients were treated with USFR, and 22 received urgent radiotherapy alone. Outcome Measures: Neurological status regarding the Asia and Frankel scores, continence and ambulation, and Kranofsky’s functional score and patient life span comprised the outcome measures. Methods: This was a retrospective EMR study. Results: USFR and radiotherapy cohorts were similar in age, gender, tumor origin, and the number of spinal metastases. The most common cause of AMSCC was carcinoma of the breast (24.1%), followed by carcinoma of the lung (16.7%) and multiple myeloma (13%). Neurological status at AMSCC presentation was similar between cohorts regarding Asia and Frankel scores, continence and ambulation, and Kranofsky’s functional score. Following USFR, 59.3% of the patients had a motor strength improvement, 31.3% regained sphincter function, and 34.4% regained ambulation, while 90% of the patients treated by radiotherapy did not show any improvement. One patient under radiotherapy lost sphincter function. The treatment received did not affect the patient’s survival. A subanalysis of patients with a short life expectancy, by Tomita and Tokuhashi scores, showed missed prediction in 29.4% of cases. Conclusion: The study supports the beneficial effect of UFSR compared to urgent radiotherapy alone in treating AMSCC in all subgroups. Early surgery improved function, motor strength, sphincter control, and ambulation without affecting life span. Prognostic scores failed to predict life span in almost one-third of the patients, requiring further investigation. MDPI 2022-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9601261/ /pubmed/36290860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29100583 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hershkovich, Oded
Sakhnini, Mojahed
Gara, Sharif
Caspi, Israel
Lotan, Raphael
Acute Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: Urgent Surgery versus Radiotherapy and Treatment Result Prediction versus Actual Results
title Acute Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: Urgent Surgery versus Radiotherapy and Treatment Result Prediction versus Actual Results
title_full Acute Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: Urgent Surgery versus Radiotherapy and Treatment Result Prediction versus Actual Results
title_fullStr Acute Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: Urgent Surgery versus Radiotherapy and Treatment Result Prediction versus Actual Results
title_full_unstemmed Acute Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: Urgent Surgery versus Radiotherapy and Treatment Result Prediction versus Actual Results
title_short Acute Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: Urgent Surgery versus Radiotherapy and Treatment Result Prediction versus Actual Results
title_sort acute metastatic spinal cord compression: urgent surgery versus radiotherapy and treatment result prediction versus actual results
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36290860
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29100583
work_keys_str_mv AT hershkovichoded acutemetastaticspinalcordcompressionurgentsurgeryversusradiotherapyandtreatmentresultpredictionversusactualresults
AT sakhninimojahed acutemetastaticspinalcordcompressionurgentsurgeryversusradiotherapyandtreatmentresultpredictionversusactualresults
AT garasharif acutemetastaticspinalcordcompressionurgentsurgeryversusradiotherapyandtreatmentresultpredictionversusactualresults
AT caspiisrael acutemetastaticspinalcordcompressionurgentsurgeryversusradiotherapyandtreatmentresultpredictionversusactualresults
AT lotanraphael acutemetastaticspinalcordcompressionurgentsurgeryversusradiotherapyandtreatmentresultpredictionversusactualresults