Cargando…

A Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer with Lymph Node Involvement in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Era: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan (The MSUG94 Group)

Background: To create a nomogram for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) with lymph node involvement (LNI) in the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) era. Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted on 3195 patients with PCa who underwent RARP at nine institutions in Japan b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kawase, Makoto, Ebara, Shin, Tatenuma, Tomoyuki, Sasaki, Takeshi, Ikehata, Yoshinori, Nakayama, Akinori, Toide, Masahiro, Yoneda, Tatsuaki, Sakaguchi, Kazushige, Ishihara, Takuma, Teishima, Jun, Makiyama, Kazuhide, Inoue, Takahiro, Kitamura, Hiroshi, Saito, Kazutaka, Koga, Fumitaka, Urakami, Shinji, Koie, Takuya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36292234
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102545
_version_ 1784817047045144576
author Kawase, Makoto
Ebara, Shin
Tatenuma, Tomoyuki
Sasaki, Takeshi
Ikehata, Yoshinori
Nakayama, Akinori
Toide, Masahiro
Yoneda, Tatsuaki
Sakaguchi, Kazushige
Ishihara, Takuma
Teishima, Jun
Makiyama, Kazuhide
Inoue, Takahiro
Kitamura, Hiroshi
Saito, Kazutaka
Koga, Fumitaka
Urakami, Shinji
Koie, Takuya
author_facet Kawase, Makoto
Ebara, Shin
Tatenuma, Tomoyuki
Sasaki, Takeshi
Ikehata, Yoshinori
Nakayama, Akinori
Toide, Masahiro
Yoneda, Tatsuaki
Sakaguchi, Kazushige
Ishihara, Takuma
Teishima, Jun
Makiyama, Kazuhide
Inoue, Takahiro
Kitamura, Hiroshi
Saito, Kazutaka
Koga, Fumitaka
Urakami, Shinji
Koie, Takuya
author_sort Kawase, Makoto
collection PubMed
description Background: To create a nomogram for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) with lymph node involvement (LNI) in the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) era. Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted on 3195 patients with PCa who underwent RARP at nine institutions in Japan between September 2012 and August 2021. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify factors strongly associated with LNI. The Bootstrap-area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to assess the internal validity of the prediction model. Results: A total of 1855 patients were enrolled in this study. Overall, 93 patients (5.0%) had LNI. On multivariable analyses, initial prostate-specific antigen, number of cancer-positive and-negative biopsy cores, biopsy Gleason grade, and clinical T stage were independent predictors of PCa with LNI. The nomogram predicting PCa with LNI has been demonstrated (AUC 84%). Using a nomogram cut-off of 6%, 492 of 1855 patients (26.5%) would avoid unnecessary pelvic lymph node dissection, and PCa with LNI would be missed in two patients (0.1%). The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values associated with a cutoff of 6% were 74%, 80%, and 99.6%, respectively. Conclusions: We developed a clinically applicable nomogram for predicting the probability of patients with PCa with LNI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9601367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96013672022-10-27 A Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer with Lymph Node Involvement in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Era: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan (The MSUG94 Group) Kawase, Makoto Ebara, Shin Tatenuma, Tomoyuki Sasaki, Takeshi Ikehata, Yoshinori Nakayama, Akinori Toide, Masahiro Yoneda, Tatsuaki Sakaguchi, Kazushige Ishihara, Takuma Teishima, Jun Makiyama, Kazuhide Inoue, Takahiro Kitamura, Hiroshi Saito, Kazutaka Koga, Fumitaka Urakami, Shinji Koie, Takuya Diagnostics (Basel) Article Background: To create a nomogram for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) with lymph node involvement (LNI) in the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) era. Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted on 3195 patients with PCa who underwent RARP at nine institutions in Japan between September 2012 and August 2021. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify factors strongly associated with LNI. The Bootstrap-area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to assess the internal validity of the prediction model. Results: A total of 1855 patients were enrolled in this study. Overall, 93 patients (5.0%) had LNI. On multivariable analyses, initial prostate-specific antigen, number of cancer-positive and-negative biopsy cores, biopsy Gleason grade, and clinical T stage were independent predictors of PCa with LNI. The nomogram predicting PCa with LNI has been demonstrated (AUC 84%). Using a nomogram cut-off of 6%, 492 of 1855 patients (26.5%) would avoid unnecessary pelvic lymph node dissection, and PCa with LNI would be missed in two patients (0.1%). The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values associated with a cutoff of 6% were 74%, 80%, and 99.6%, respectively. Conclusions: We developed a clinically applicable nomogram for predicting the probability of patients with PCa with LNI. MDPI 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9601367/ /pubmed/36292234 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102545 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kawase, Makoto
Ebara, Shin
Tatenuma, Tomoyuki
Sasaki, Takeshi
Ikehata, Yoshinori
Nakayama, Akinori
Toide, Masahiro
Yoneda, Tatsuaki
Sakaguchi, Kazushige
Ishihara, Takuma
Teishima, Jun
Makiyama, Kazuhide
Inoue, Takahiro
Kitamura, Hiroshi
Saito, Kazutaka
Koga, Fumitaka
Urakami, Shinji
Koie, Takuya
A Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer with Lymph Node Involvement in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Era: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan (The MSUG94 Group)
title A Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer with Lymph Node Involvement in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Era: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan (The MSUG94 Group)
title_full A Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer with Lymph Node Involvement in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Era: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan (The MSUG94 Group)
title_fullStr A Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer with Lymph Node Involvement in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Era: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan (The MSUG94 Group)
title_full_unstemmed A Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer with Lymph Node Involvement in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Era: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan (The MSUG94 Group)
title_short A Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer with Lymph Node Involvement in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Era: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan (The MSUG94 Group)
title_sort nomogram for predicting prostate cancer with lymph node involvement in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy era: a retrospective multicenter cohort study in japan (the msug94 group)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36292234
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102545
work_keys_str_mv AT kawasemakoto anomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT ebarashin anomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT tatenumatomoyuki anomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT sasakitakeshi anomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT ikehatayoshinori anomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT nakayamaakinori anomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT toidemasahiro anomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT yonedatatsuaki anomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT sakaguchikazushige anomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT ishiharatakuma anomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT teishimajun anomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT makiyamakazuhide anomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT inouetakahiro anomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT kitamurahiroshi anomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT saitokazutaka anomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT kogafumitaka anomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT urakamishinji anomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT koietakuya anomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT kawasemakoto nomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT ebarashin nomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT tatenumatomoyuki nomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT sasakitakeshi nomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT ikehatayoshinori nomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT nakayamaakinori nomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT toidemasahiro nomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT yonedatatsuaki nomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT sakaguchikazushige nomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT ishiharatakuma nomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT teishimajun nomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT makiyamakazuhide nomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT inouetakahiro nomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT kitamurahiroshi nomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT saitokazutaka nomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT kogafumitaka nomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT urakamishinji nomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group
AT koietakuya nomogramforpredictingprostatecancerwithlymphnodeinvolvementinrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyeraaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudyinjapanthemsug94group