Cargando…

Learned Practical Guidelines for Evaluating Conditional Entropy and Mutual Information in Discovering Major Factors of Response-vs.-Covariate Dynamics

We reformulate and reframe a series of increasingly complex parametric statistical topics into a framework of response-vs.-covariate (Re-Co) dynamics that is described without any explicit functional structures. Then we resolve these topics’ data analysis tasks by discovering major factors underlyin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Ting-Li, Fushing, Hsieh, Chou, Elizabeth P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420402
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24101382
_version_ 1784817062784270336
author Chen, Ting-Li
Fushing, Hsieh
Chou, Elizabeth P.
author_facet Chen, Ting-Li
Fushing, Hsieh
Chou, Elizabeth P.
author_sort Chen, Ting-Li
collection PubMed
description We reformulate and reframe a series of increasingly complex parametric statistical topics into a framework of response-vs.-covariate (Re-Co) dynamics that is described without any explicit functional structures. Then we resolve these topics’ data analysis tasks by discovering major factors underlying such Re-Co dynamics by only making use of data’s categorical nature. The major factor selection protocol at the heart of Categorical Exploratory Data Analysis (CEDA) paradigm is illustrated and carried out by employing Shannon’s conditional entropy (CE) and mutual information ([Formula: see text]) as the two key Information Theoretical measurements. Through the process of evaluating these two entropy-based measurements and resolving statistical tasks, we acquire several computational guidelines for carrying out the major factor selection protocol in a do-and-learn fashion. Specifically, practical guidelines are established for evaluating CE and [Formula: see text] in accordance with the criterion called [C1:confirmable]. Following the [C1:confirmable] criterion, we make no attempts on acquiring consistent estimations of these theoretical information measurements. All evaluations are carried out on a contingency table platform, upon which the practical guidelines also provide ways of lessening the effects of the curse of dimensionality. We explicitly carry out six examples of Re-Co dynamics, within each of which, several widely extended scenarios are also explored and discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9601428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96014282022-10-27 Learned Practical Guidelines for Evaluating Conditional Entropy and Mutual Information in Discovering Major Factors of Response-vs.-Covariate Dynamics Chen, Ting-Li Fushing, Hsieh Chou, Elizabeth P. Entropy (Basel) Article We reformulate and reframe a series of increasingly complex parametric statistical topics into a framework of response-vs.-covariate (Re-Co) dynamics that is described without any explicit functional structures. Then we resolve these topics’ data analysis tasks by discovering major factors underlying such Re-Co dynamics by only making use of data’s categorical nature. The major factor selection protocol at the heart of Categorical Exploratory Data Analysis (CEDA) paradigm is illustrated and carried out by employing Shannon’s conditional entropy (CE) and mutual information ([Formula: see text]) as the two key Information Theoretical measurements. Through the process of evaluating these two entropy-based measurements and resolving statistical tasks, we acquire several computational guidelines for carrying out the major factor selection protocol in a do-and-learn fashion. Specifically, practical guidelines are established for evaluating CE and [Formula: see text] in accordance with the criterion called [C1:confirmable]. Following the [C1:confirmable] criterion, we make no attempts on acquiring consistent estimations of these theoretical information measurements. All evaluations are carried out on a contingency table platform, upon which the practical guidelines also provide ways of lessening the effects of the curse of dimensionality. We explicitly carry out six examples of Re-Co dynamics, within each of which, several widely extended scenarios are also explored and discussed. MDPI 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9601428/ /pubmed/37420402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24101382 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chen, Ting-Li
Fushing, Hsieh
Chou, Elizabeth P.
Learned Practical Guidelines for Evaluating Conditional Entropy and Mutual Information in Discovering Major Factors of Response-vs.-Covariate Dynamics
title Learned Practical Guidelines for Evaluating Conditional Entropy and Mutual Information in Discovering Major Factors of Response-vs.-Covariate Dynamics
title_full Learned Practical Guidelines for Evaluating Conditional Entropy and Mutual Information in Discovering Major Factors of Response-vs.-Covariate Dynamics
title_fullStr Learned Practical Guidelines for Evaluating Conditional Entropy and Mutual Information in Discovering Major Factors of Response-vs.-Covariate Dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Learned Practical Guidelines for Evaluating Conditional Entropy and Mutual Information in Discovering Major Factors of Response-vs.-Covariate Dynamics
title_short Learned Practical Guidelines for Evaluating Conditional Entropy and Mutual Information in Discovering Major Factors of Response-vs.-Covariate Dynamics
title_sort learned practical guidelines for evaluating conditional entropy and mutual information in discovering major factors of response-vs.-covariate dynamics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420402
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24101382
work_keys_str_mv AT chentingli learnedpracticalguidelinesforevaluatingconditionalentropyandmutualinformationindiscoveringmajorfactorsofresponsevscovariatedynamics
AT fushinghsieh learnedpracticalguidelinesforevaluatingconditionalentropyandmutualinformationindiscoveringmajorfactorsofresponsevscovariatedynamics
AT chouelizabethp learnedpracticalguidelinesforevaluatingconditionalentropyandmutualinformationindiscoveringmajorfactorsofresponsevscovariatedynamics