Cargando…

Platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was widely accepted for treating TNBC. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and survival benefit of platinum-based adjuvant therapy (PBAT) in treating TNBC....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Kaigang, Ren, Xuanlei, Hong, Xiaoming, Zhu, Shuiyin, Wang, Dongjie, Ye, Xiaoming, Ren, Xiaoting
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36278891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2115616
_version_ 1784817093612404736
author Xie, Kaigang
Ren, Xuanlei
Hong, Xiaoming
Zhu, Shuiyin
Wang, Dongjie
Ye, Xiaoming
Ren, Xiaoting
author_facet Xie, Kaigang
Ren, Xuanlei
Hong, Xiaoming
Zhu, Shuiyin
Wang, Dongjie
Ye, Xiaoming
Ren, Xiaoting
author_sort Xie, Kaigang
collection PubMed
description Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was widely accepted for treating TNBC. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and survival benefit of platinum-based adjuvant therapy (PBAT) in treating TNBC. The keywords were searched in Medline, Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library database up to July 24, 2022. All the randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing PBAT and non-PBAT in treating TNBC were included in our study. The pathological complete remission (pCR) and complications were compared by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were compared by hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CIs. A total of 19 RCTs were included in our meta-analysis, among which 2,501 patients were treated with PBAT and 2,290 with non-PBAT. The patients treated with PBAT combined a significantly higher pCR rate compared to those patients treated with non-PBAT (49.8% versus 36.4%, OR = 1.27, 95%CI = 1.14–1.43, P < 0.001). Besides, patients treated with PBAT had a significantly better RFS (HR = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.63–0.95, P = 0.016), but not in OS (HR = 0.84, P = 0.304). Although the occurrence of neutropenia and nausea were slightly different between the PBAT group (51.5% and 24.4%) and the non-PBAT group (47.0% and 29.4%), the complications were acceptable in the two treatments groups. Our results demonstrated that TNBC patients treated with PBAT could achieve a higher pCR rate and better RFS benefit without a higher complication rate. Highlights Platinum-based adjuvant therapy provided a higher pCR rate for TNBC. Platinum-based adjuvant therapy prolonged the RFS but without prolongingthe OS. Neutropenia and nausea rate was different between group PBAT and non-PBAT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9601551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96015512023-02-07 Platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials Xie, Kaigang Ren, Xuanlei Hong, Xiaoming Zhu, Shuiyin Wang, Dongjie Ye, Xiaoming Ren, Xiaoting Bioengineered Research Paper Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was widely accepted for treating TNBC. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and survival benefit of platinum-based adjuvant therapy (PBAT) in treating TNBC. The keywords were searched in Medline, Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library database up to July 24, 2022. All the randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing PBAT and non-PBAT in treating TNBC were included in our study. The pathological complete remission (pCR) and complications were compared by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were compared by hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CIs. A total of 19 RCTs were included in our meta-analysis, among which 2,501 patients were treated with PBAT and 2,290 with non-PBAT. The patients treated with PBAT combined a significantly higher pCR rate compared to those patients treated with non-PBAT (49.8% versus 36.4%, OR = 1.27, 95%CI = 1.14–1.43, P < 0.001). Besides, patients treated with PBAT had a significantly better RFS (HR = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.63–0.95, P = 0.016), but not in OS (HR = 0.84, P = 0.304). Although the occurrence of neutropenia and nausea were slightly different between the PBAT group (51.5% and 24.4%) and the non-PBAT group (47.0% and 29.4%), the complications were acceptable in the two treatments groups. Our results demonstrated that TNBC patients treated with PBAT could achieve a higher pCR rate and better RFS benefit without a higher complication rate. Highlights Platinum-based adjuvant therapy provided a higher pCR rate for TNBC. Platinum-based adjuvant therapy prolonged the RFS but without prolongingthe OS. Neutropenia and nausea rate was different between group PBAT and non-PBAT. Taylor & Francis 2022-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9601551/ /pubmed/36278891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2115616 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Xie, Kaigang
Ren, Xuanlei
Hong, Xiaoming
Zhu, Shuiyin
Wang, Dongjie
Ye, Xiaoming
Ren, Xiaoting
Platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials
title Platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials
title_full Platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials
title_short Platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials
title_sort platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36278891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2115616
work_keys_str_mv AT xiekaigang platinumbasedadjuvanttherapywasefficientfortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT renxuanlei platinumbasedadjuvanttherapywasefficientfortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hongxiaoming platinumbasedadjuvanttherapywasefficientfortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhushuiyin platinumbasedadjuvanttherapywasefficientfortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wangdongjie platinumbasedadjuvanttherapywasefficientfortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yexiaoming platinumbasedadjuvanttherapywasefficientfortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT renxiaoting platinumbasedadjuvanttherapywasefficientfortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials