Cargando…
Platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was widely accepted for treating TNBC. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and survival benefit of platinum-based adjuvant therapy (PBAT) in treating TNBC....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36278891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2115616 |
_version_ | 1784817093612404736 |
---|---|
author | Xie, Kaigang Ren, Xuanlei Hong, Xiaoming Zhu, Shuiyin Wang, Dongjie Ye, Xiaoming Ren, Xiaoting |
author_facet | Xie, Kaigang Ren, Xuanlei Hong, Xiaoming Zhu, Shuiyin Wang, Dongjie Ye, Xiaoming Ren, Xiaoting |
author_sort | Xie, Kaigang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was widely accepted for treating TNBC. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and survival benefit of platinum-based adjuvant therapy (PBAT) in treating TNBC. The keywords were searched in Medline, Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library database up to July 24, 2022. All the randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing PBAT and non-PBAT in treating TNBC were included in our study. The pathological complete remission (pCR) and complications were compared by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were compared by hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CIs. A total of 19 RCTs were included in our meta-analysis, among which 2,501 patients were treated with PBAT and 2,290 with non-PBAT. The patients treated with PBAT combined a significantly higher pCR rate compared to those patients treated with non-PBAT (49.8% versus 36.4%, OR = 1.27, 95%CI = 1.14–1.43, P < 0.001). Besides, patients treated with PBAT had a significantly better RFS (HR = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.63–0.95, P = 0.016), but not in OS (HR = 0.84, P = 0.304). Although the occurrence of neutropenia and nausea were slightly different between the PBAT group (51.5% and 24.4%) and the non-PBAT group (47.0% and 29.4%), the complications were acceptable in the two treatments groups. Our results demonstrated that TNBC patients treated with PBAT could achieve a higher pCR rate and better RFS benefit without a higher complication rate. Highlights Platinum-based adjuvant therapy provided a higher pCR rate for TNBC. Platinum-based adjuvant therapy prolonged the RFS but without prolongingthe OS. Neutropenia and nausea rate was different between group PBAT and non-PBAT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9601551 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96015512023-02-07 Platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials Xie, Kaigang Ren, Xuanlei Hong, Xiaoming Zhu, Shuiyin Wang, Dongjie Ye, Xiaoming Ren, Xiaoting Bioengineered Research Paper Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was widely accepted for treating TNBC. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and survival benefit of platinum-based adjuvant therapy (PBAT) in treating TNBC. The keywords were searched in Medline, Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library database up to July 24, 2022. All the randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing PBAT and non-PBAT in treating TNBC were included in our study. The pathological complete remission (pCR) and complications were compared by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were compared by hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CIs. A total of 19 RCTs were included in our meta-analysis, among which 2,501 patients were treated with PBAT and 2,290 with non-PBAT. The patients treated with PBAT combined a significantly higher pCR rate compared to those patients treated with non-PBAT (49.8% versus 36.4%, OR = 1.27, 95%CI = 1.14–1.43, P < 0.001). Besides, patients treated with PBAT had a significantly better RFS (HR = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.63–0.95, P = 0.016), but not in OS (HR = 0.84, P = 0.304). Although the occurrence of neutropenia and nausea were slightly different between the PBAT group (51.5% and 24.4%) and the non-PBAT group (47.0% and 29.4%), the complications were acceptable in the two treatments groups. Our results demonstrated that TNBC patients treated with PBAT could achieve a higher pCR rate and better RFS benefit without a higher complication rate. Highlights Platinum-based adjuvant therapy provided a higher pCR rate for TNBC. Platinum-based adjuvant therapy prolonged the RFS but without prolongingthe OS. Neutropenia and nausea rate was different between group PBAT and non-PBAT. Taylor & Francis 2022-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9601551/ /pubmed/36278891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2115616 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Xie, Kaigang Ren, Xuanlei Hong, Xiaoming Zhu, Shuiyin Wang, Dongjie Ye, Xiaoming Ren, Xiaoting Platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials |
title | Platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36278891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2115616 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiekaigang platinumbasedadjuvanttherapywasefficientfortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT renxuanlei platinumbasedadjuvanttherapywasefficientfortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT hongxiaoming platinumbasedadjuvanttherapywasefficientfortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhushuiyin platinumbasedadjuvanttherapywasefficientfortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wangdongjie platinumbasedadjuvanttherapywasefficientfortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT yexiaoming platinumbasedadjuvanttherapywasefficientfortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT renxiaoting platinumbasedadjuvanttherapywasefficientfortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials |