Cargando…
Four-Objective Optimization of an Irreversible Magnetohydrodynamic Cycle
Based on the existing model of an irreversible magnetohydrodynamic cycle, this paper uses finite time thermodynamic theory and multi-objective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II), introduces heat exchanger thermal conductance distribution and isentropic temperature ratio of working fluid as optimization var...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601762/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420490 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24101470 |
_version_ | 1784817146179616768 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Qingkun Chen, Lingen Ge, Yanlin Feng, Huijun |
author_facet | Wu, Qingkun Chen, Lingen Ge, Yanlin Feng, Huijun |
author_sort | Wu, Qingkun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Based on the existing model of an irreversible magnetohydrodynamic cycle, this paper uses finite time thermodynamic theory and multi-objective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II), introduces heat exchanger thermal conductance distribution and isentropic temperature ratio of working fluid as optimization variables, and takes power output, efficiency, ecological function, and power density as objective functions to carry out multi-objective optimization with different objective function combinations, and contrast optimization results with three decision-making approaches of LINMAP, TOPSIS, and Shannon Entropy. The results indicate that in the condition of constant gas velocity, deviation indexes are 0.1764 acquired by LINMAP and TOPSIS approaches when four-objective optimization is performed, which is less than that (0.1940) of the Shannon Entropy approach and those (0.3560, 0.7693, 0.2599, 0.1940) for four single-objective optimizations of maximum power output, efficiency, ecological function, and power density, respectively. In the condition of constant Mach number, deviation indexes are 0.1767 acquired by LINMAP and TOPSIS when four-objective optimization is performed, which is less than that (0.1950) of the Shannon Entropy approach and those (0.3600, 0.7630, 0.2637, 0.1949) for four single-objective optimizations, respectively. This indicates that the multi-objective optimization result is preferable to any single-objective optimization result. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9601762 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96017622022-10-27 Four-Objective Optimization of an Irreversible Magnetohydrodynamic Cycle Wu, Qingkun Chen, Lingen Ge, Yanlin Feng, Huijun Entropy (Basel) Article Based on the existing model of an irreversible magnetohydrodynamic cycle, this paper uses finite time thermodynamic theory and multi-objective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II), introduces heat exchanger thermal conductance distribution and isentropic temperature ratio of working fluid as optimization variables, and takes power output, efficiency, ecological function, and power density as objective functions to carry out multi-objective optimization with different objective function combinations, and contrast optimization results with three decision-making approaches of LINMAP, TOPSIS, and Shannon Entropy. The results indicate that in the condition of constant gas velocity, deviation indexes are 0.1764 acquired by LINMAP and TOPSIS approaches when four-objective optimization is performed, which is less than that (0.1940) of the Shannon Entropy approach and those (0.3560, 0.7693, 0.2599, 0.1940) for four single-objective optimizations of maximum power output, efficiency, ecological function, and power density, respectively. In the condition of constant Mach number, deviation indexes are 0.1767 acquired by LINMAP and TOPSIS when four-objective optimization is performed, which is less than that (0.1950) of the Shannon Entropy approach and those (0.3600, 0.7630, 0.2637, 0.1949) for four single-objective optimizations, respectively. This indicates that the multi-objective optimization result is preferable to any single-objective optimization result. MDPI 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9601762/ /pubmed/37420490 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24101470 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wu, Qingkun Chen, Lingen Ge, Yanlin Feng, Huijun Four-Objective Optimization of an Irreversible Magnetohydrodynamic Cycle |
title | Four-Objective Optimization of an Irreversible Magnetohydrodynamic Cycle |
title_full | Four-Objective Optimization of an Irreversible Magnetohydrodynamic Cycle |
title_fullStr | Four-Objective Optimization of an Irreversible Magnetohydrodynamic Cycle |
title_full_unstemmed | Four-Objective Optimization of an Irreversible Magnetohydrodynamic Cycle |
title_short | Four-Objective Optimization of an Irreversible Magnetohydrodynamic Cycle |
title_sort | four-objective optimization of an irreversible magnetohydrodynamic cycle |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601762/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420490 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24101470 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuqingkun fourobjectiveoptimizationofanirreversiblemagnetohydrodynamiccycle AT chenlingen fourobjectiveoptimizationofanirreversiblemagnetohydrodynamiccycle AT geyanlin fourobjectiveoptimizationofanirreversiblemagnetohydrodynamiccycle AT fenghuijun fourobjectiveoptimizationofanirreversiblemagnetohydrodynamiccycle |