Cargando…

Four-Objective Optimization of an Irreversible Magnetohydrodynamic Cycle

Based on the existing model of an irreversible magnetohydrodynamic cycle, this paper uses finite time thermodynamic theory and multi-objective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II), introduces heat exchanger thermal conductance distribution and isentropic temperature ratio of working fluid as optimization var...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Qingkun, Chen, Lingen, Ge, Yanlin, Feng, Huijun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420490
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24101470
_version_ 1784817146179616768
author Wu, Qingkun
Chen, Lingen
Ge, Yanlin
Feng, Huijun
author_facet Wu, Qingkun
Chen, Lingen
Ge, Yanlin
Feng, Huijun
author_sort Wu, Qingkun
collection PubMed
description Based on the existing model of an irreversible magnetohydrodynamic cycle, this paper uses finite time thermodynamic theory and multi-objective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II), introduces heat exchanger thermal conductance distribution and isentropic temperature ratio of working fluid as optimization variables, and takes power output, efficiency, ecological function, and power density as objective functions to carry out multi-objective optimization with different objective function combinations, and contrast optimization results with three decision-making approaches of LINMAP, TOPSIS, and Shannon Entropy. The results indicate that in the condition of constant gas velocity, deviation indexes are 0.1764 acquired by LINMAP and TOPSIS approaches when four-objective optimization is performed, which is less than that (0.1940) of the Shannon Entropy approach and those (0.3560, 0.7693, 0.2599, 0.1940) for four single-objective optimizations of maximum power output, efficiency, ecological function, and power density, respectively. In the condition of constant Mach number, deviation indexes are 0.1767 acquired by LINMAP and TOPSIS when four-objective optimization is performed, which is less than that (0.1950) of the Shannon Entropy approach and those (0.3600, 0.7630, 0.2637, 0.1949) for four single-objective optimizations, respectively. This indicates that the multi-objective optimization result is preferable to any single-objective optimization result.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9601762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96017622022-10-27 Four-Objective Optimization of an Irreversible Magnetohydrodynamic Cycle Wu, Qingkun Chen, Lingen Ge, Yanlin Feng, Huijun Entropy (Basel) Article Based on the existing model of an irreversible magnetohydrodynamic cycle, this paper uses finite time thermodynamic theory and multi-objective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II), introduces heat exchanger thermal conductance distribution and isentropic temperature ratio of working fluid as optimization variables, and takes power output, efficiency, ecological function, and power density as objective functions to carry out multi-objective optimization with different objective function combinations, and contrast optimization results with three decision-making approaches of LINMAP, TOPSIS, and Shannon Entropy. The results indicate that in the condition of constant gas velocity, deviation indexes are 0.1764 acquired by LINMAP and TOPSIS approaches when four-objective optimization is performed, which is less than that (0.1940) of the Shannon Entropy approach and those (0.3560, 0.7693, 0.2599, 0.1940) for four single-objective optimizations of maximum power output, efficiency, ecological function, and power density, respectively. In the condition of constant Mach number, deviation indexes are 0.1767 acquired by LINMAP and TOPSIS when four-objective optimization is performed, which is less than that (0.1950) of the Shannon Entropy approach and those (0.3600, 0.7630, 0.2637, 0.1949) for four single-objective optimizations, respectively. This indicates that the multi-objective optimization result is preferable to any single-objective optimization result. MDPI 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9601762/ /pubmed/37420490 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24101470 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wu, Qingkun
Chen, Lingen
Ge, Yanlin
Feng, Huijun
Four-Objective Optimization of an Irreversible Magnetohydrodynamic Cycle
title Four-Objective Optimization of an Irreversible Magnetohydrodynamic Cycle
title_full Four-Objective Optimization of an Irreversible Magnetohydrodynamic Cycle
title_fullStr Four-Objective Optimization of an Irreversible Magnetohydrodynamic Cycle
title_full_unstemmed Four-Objective Optimization of an Irreversible Magnetohydrodynamic Cycle
title_short Four-Objective Optimization of an Irreversible Magnetohydrodynamic Cycle
title_sort four-objective optimization of an irreversible magnetohydrodynamic cycle
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420490
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24101470
work_keys_str_mv AT wuqingkun fourobjectiveoptimizationofanirreversiblemagnetohydrodynamiccycle
AT chenlingen fourobjectiveoptimizationofanirreversiblemagnetohydrodynamiccycle
AT geyanlin fourobjectiveoptimizationofanirreversiblemagnetohydrodynamiccycle
AT fenghuijun fourobjectiveoptimizationofanirreversiblemagnetohydrodynamiccycle