Cargando…

Participant Choice towards Receiving Potential Additional Findings in an Australian Nephrology Research Genomics Study

The choices of participants in nephrology research genomics studies about receiving additional findings (AFs) are unclear as are participant factors that might influence those choices. Methods: Participant choices and factors potentially impacting decisions about AFs were examined in an Australian s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Shea, Rosie, Wood, Alasdair, Patel, Chirag, McCarthy, Hugh J., Mallawaarachchi, Amali, Quinlan, Catherine, Simons, Cas, Stark, Zornitza, Mallett, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36292688
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13101804
_version_ 1784817200361635840
author O’Shea, Rosie
Wood, Alasdair
Patel, Chirag
McCarthy, Hugh J.
Mallawaarachchi, Amali
Quinlan, Catherine
Simons, Cas
Stark, Zornitza
Mallett, Andrew J.
author_facet O’Shea, Rosie
Wood, Alasdair
Patel, Chirag
McCarthy, Hugh J.
Mallawaarachchi, Amali
Quinlan, Catherine
Simons, Cas
Stark, Zornitza
Mallett, Andrew J.
author_sort O’Shea, Rosie
collection PubMed
description The choices of participants in nephrology research genomics studies about receiving additional findings (AFs) are unclear as are participant factors that might influence those choices. Methods: Participant choices and factors potentially impacting decisions about AFs were examined in an Australian study applying research genomic testing following uninformative diagnostic genetic testing for suspected monogenic kidney disease. Results: 93% of participants (195/210) chose to receive potential AFs. There were no statistically significant differences between those consenting to receive AFs or not in terms of gender (p = 0.97), median age (p = 0.56), being personally affected by the inherited kidney disease of interest (p = 0.38), or by the inheritance pattern (p = 0.12–0.19). Participants were more likely to choose not to receive AFs if the family proband presented in adulthood (p = 0.01), if there was family history of another genetic disorder (p = 0.01), and where the consent process was undertaken by an adult nephrologist (p = 0.01). Conclusion: The majority of participants in this nephrology research genomics study chose to receive potential AFs. Younger age of the family proband, family history of an alternate genetic disorder, and consenting by some multidisciplinary team members might impact upon participant choices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9601985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96019852022-10-27 Participant Choice towards Receiving Potential Additional Findings in an Australian Nephrology Research Genomics Study O’Shea, Rosie Wood, Alasdair Patel, Chirag McCarthy, Hugh J. Mallawaarachchi, Amali Quinlan, Catherine Simons, Cas Stark, Zornitza Mallett, Andrew J. Genes (Basel) Article The choices of participants in nephrology research genomics studies about receiving additional findings (AFs) are unclear as are participant factors that might influence those choices. Methods: Participant choices and factors potentially impacting decisions about AFs were examined in an Australian study applying research genomic testing following uninformative diagnostic genetic testing for suspected monogenic kidney disease. Results: 93% of participants (195/210) chose to receive potential AFs. There were no statistically significant differences between those consenting to receive AFs or not in terms of gender (p = 0.97), median age (p = 0.56), being personally affected by the inherited kidney disease of interest (p = 0.38), or by the inheritance pattern (p = 0.12–0.19). Participants were more likely to choose not to receive AFs if the family proband presented in adulthood (p = 0.01), if there was family history of another genetic disorder (p = 0.01), and where the consent process was undertaken by an adult nephrologist (p = 0.01). Conclusion: The majority of participants in this nephrology research genomics study chose to receive potential AFs. Younger age of the family proband, family history of an alternate genetic disorder, and consenting by some multidisciplinary team members might impact upon participant choices. MDPI 2022-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9601985/ /pubmed/36292688 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13101804 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
O’Shea, Rosie
Wood, Alasdair
Patel, Chirag
McCarthy, Hugh J.
Mallawaarachchi, Amali
Quinlan, Catherine
Simons, Cas
Stark, Zornitza
Mallett, Andrew J.
Participant Choice towards Receiving Potential Additional Findings in an Australian Nephrology Research Genomics Study
title Participant Choice towards Receiving Potential Additional Findings in an Australian Nephrology Research Genomics Study
title_full Participant Choice towards Receiving Potential Additional Findings in an Australian Nephrology Research Genomics Study
title_fullStr Participant Choice towards Receiving Potential Additional Findings in an Australian Nephrology Research Genomics Study
title_full_unstemmed Participant Choice towards Receiving Potential Additional Findings in an Australian Nephrology Research Genomics Study
title_short Participant Choice towards Receiving Potential Additional Findings in an Australian Nephrology Research Genomics Study
title_sort participant choice towards receiving potential additional findings in an australian nephrology research genomics study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36292688
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13101804
work_keys_str_mv AT oshearosie participantchoicetowardsreceivingpotentialadditionalfindingsinanaustraliannephrologyresearchgenomicsstudy
AT woodalasdair participantchoicetowardsreceivingpotentialadditionalfindingsinanaustraliannephrologyresearchgenomicsstudy
AT patelchirag participantchoicetowardsreceivingpotentialadditionalfindingsinanaustraliannephrologyresearchgenomicsstudy
AT mccarthyhughj participantchoicetowardsreceivingpotentialadditionalfindingsinanaustraliannephrologyresearchgenomicsstudy
AT mallawaarachchiamali participantchoicetowardsreceivingpotentialadditionalfindingsinanaustraliannephrologyresearchgenomicsstudy
AT quinlancatherine participantchoicetowardsreceivingpotentialadditionalfindingsinanaustraliannephrologyresearchgenomicsstudy
AT simonscas participantchoicetowardsreceivingpotentialadditionalfindingsinanaustraliannephrologyresearchgenomicsstudy
AT starkzornitza participantchoicetowardsreceivingpotentialadditionalfindingsinanaustraliannephrologyresearchgenomicsstudy
AT mallettandrewj participantchoicetowardsreceivingpotentialadditionalfindingsinanaustraliannephrologyresearchgenomicsstudy