Cargando…

The Effects of the Marination Process with Different Vinegar Varieties on Various Quality Criteria and Heterocyclic Aromatic Amine Formation in Beef Steak

Herein, the effect of the dipping (static) marination process (at 4 °C for 2 h) with different types of vinegar (balsamic, pomegranate, apple, and grape) on various quality properties, including texture and protein profile of beef steaks and the formation of heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs) in be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fencioglu, Halenur, Oz, Emel, Turhan, Sadettin, Proestos, Charalampos, Oz, Fatih
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9602021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37431000
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11203251
_version_ 1784817209771556864
author Fencioglu, Halenur
Oz, Emel
Turhan, Sadettin
Proestos, Charalampos
Oz, Fatih
author_facet Fencioglu, Halenur
Oz, Emel
Turhan, Sadettin
Proestos, Charalampos
Oz, Fatih
author_sort Fencioglu, Halenur
collection PubMed
description Herein, the effect of the dipping (static) marination process (at 4 °C for 2 h) with different types of vinegar (balsamic, pomegranate, apple, and grape) on various quality properties, including texture and protein profile of beef steaks and the formation of heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs) in beef steaks cooked on a hot plate (at 200 °C for 24 min), were determined. The results showed that 3.12–4.13% of the marinate liquids were absorbed by beef steak as a result of the marination process. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between the marinated and cooked beef steaks in terms of water content, cooking loss, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) value, hardness, cohesiveness, and chewiness. However, significant differences were detected in terms of pH value and color values (L*, a*, and b*) (p < 0.01), and springiness, 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo (4,5-f) quinoxaline (MeIQx) and total HAA content (p < 0.05). The marination with pomegranate vinegar resulted in the formation of darker steak, while a lighter one was obtained when apple vinegar was used in the marination. The use of balsamic and grape vinegar in the marination process decreased the springiness value compared to the control group. The myofibrillar proteins of beef steaks marinated with different types of vinegar generally showed a similar sodium dodecyl-sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) profile. However, some differences were observed in the band density of some proteins depending on the trial and the type of marination. In this study, of the nine examined HAAs, only two (2-amino-3-methylimidazo (4,5-f) quinoline (IQ) and MeIQx) could be detected and quantified. IQ was detected only in the control group steak (up to 0.51 ng/g), while MeIQx was detected in all treatment groups (up to 2.22 ng/g). The total HAA content varied between 0.59–2.22 ng/g. It was determined that the marination process with different vinegar types had different effects on the total HAA content of the steaks. Using balsamic and apple vinegar in the marination process decreased the total HAA content compared to the control group, but this decrease was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). On the other hand, using grape and pomegranate vinegar in the marination process increased the total HAA content, but this increase was only significant (p < 0.05) in the marination with pomegranate vinegar.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9602021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96020212022-10-27 The Effects of the Marination Process with Different Vinegar Varieties on Various Quality Criteria and Heterocyclic Aromatic Amine Formation in Beef Steak Fencioglu, Halenur Oz, Emel Turhan, Sadettin Proestos, Charalampos Oz, Fatih Foods Article Herein, the effect of the dipping (static) marination process (at 4 °C for 2 h) with different types of vinegar (balsamic, pomegranate, apple, and grape) on various quality properties, including texture and protein profile of beef steaks and the formation of heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs) in beef steaks cooked on a hot plate (at 200 °C for 24 min), were determined. The results showed that 3.12–4.13% of the marinate liquids were absorbed by beef steak as a result of the marination process. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between the marinated and cooked beef steaks in terms of water content, cooking loss, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) value, hardness, cohesiveness, and chewiness. However, significant differences were detected in terms of pH value and color values (L*, a*, and b*) (p < 0.01), and springiness, 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo (4,5-f) quinoxaline (MeIQx) and total HAA content (p < 0.05). The marination with pomegranate vinegar resulted in the formation of darker steak, while a lighter one was obtained when apple vinegar was used in the marination. The use of balsamic and grape vinegar in the marination process decreased the springiness value compared to the control group. The myofibrillar proteins of beef steaks marinated with different types of vinegar generally showed a similar sodium dodecyl-sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) profile. However, some differences were observed in the band density of some proteins depending on the trial and the type of marination. In this study, of the nine examined HAAs, only two (2-amino-3-methylimidazo (4,5-f) quinoline (IQ) and MeIQx) could be detected and quantified. IQ was detected only in the control group steak (up to 0.51 ng/g), while MeIQx was detected in all treatment groups (up to 2.22 ng/g). The total HAA content varied between 0.59–2.22 ng/g. It was determined that the marination process with different vinegar types had different effects on the total HAA content of the steaks. Using balsamic and apple vinegar in the marination process decreased the total HAA content compared to the control group, but this decrease was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). On the other hand, using grape and pomegranate vinegar in the marination process increased the total HAA content, but this increase was only significant (p < 0.05) in the marination with pomegranate vinegar. MDPI 2022-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9602021/ /pubmed/37431000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11203251 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fencioglu, Halenur
Oz, Emel
Turhan, Sadettin
Proestos, Charalampos
Oz, Fatih
The Effects of the Marination Process with Different Vinegar Varieties on Various Quality Criteria and Heterocyclic Aromatic Amine Formation in Beef Steak
title The Effects of the Marination Process with Different Vinegar Varieties on Various Quality Criteria and Heterocyclic Aromatic Amine Formation in Beef Steak
title_full The Effects of the Marination Process with Different Vinegar Varieties on Various Quality Criteria and Heterocyclic Aromatic Amine Formation in Beef Steak
title_fullStr The Effects of the Marination Process with Different Vinegar Varieties on Various Quality Criteria and Heterocyclic Aromatic Amine Formation in Beef Steak
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of the Marination Process with Different Vinegar Varieties on Various Quality Criteria and Heterocyclic Aromatic Amine Formation in Beef Steak
title_short The Effects of the Marination Process with Different Vinegar Varieties on Various Quality Criteria and Heterocyclic Aromatic Amine Formation in Beef Steak
title_sort effects of the marination process with different vinegar varieties on various quality criteria and heterocyclic aromatic amine formation in beef steak
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9602021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37431000
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11203251
work_keys_str_mv AT fenciogluhalenur theeffectsofthemarinationprocesswithdifferentvinegarvarietiesonvariousqualitycriteriaandheterocyclicaromaticamineformationinbeefsteak
AT ozemel theeffectsofthemarinationprocesswithdifferentvinegarvarietiesonvariousqualitycriteriaandheterocyclicaromaticamineformationinbeefsteak
AT turhansadettin theeffectsofthemarinationprocesswithdifferentvinegarvarietiesonvariousqualitycriteriaandheterocyclicaromaticamineformationinbeefsteak
AT proestoscharalampos theeffectsofthemarinationprocesswithdifferentvinegarvarietiesonvariousqualitycriteriaandheterocyclicaromaticamineformationinbeefsteak
AT ozfatih theeffectsofthemarinationprocesswithdifferentvinegarvarietiesonvariousqualitycriteriaandheterocyclicaromaticamineformationinbeefsteak
AT fenciogluhalenur effectsofthemarinationprocesswithdifferentvinegarvarietiesonvariousqualitycriteriaandheterocyclicaromaticamineformationinbeefsteak
AT ozemel effectsofthemarinationprocesswithdifferentvinegarvarietiesonvariousqualitycriteriaandheterocyclicaromaticamineformationinbeefsteak
AT turhansadettin effectsofthemarinationprocesswithdifferentvinegarvarietiesonvariousqualitycriteriaandheterocyclicaromaticamineformationinbeefsteak
AT proestoscharalampos effectsofthemarinationprocesswithdifferentvinegarvarietiesonvariousqualitycriteriaandheterocyclicaromaticamineformationinbeefsteak
AT ozfatih effectsofthemarinationprocesswithdifferentvinegarvarietiesonvariousqualitycriteriaandheterocyclicaromaticamineformationinbeefsteak