Cargando…
The Effects of the Marination Process with Different Vinegar Varieties on Various Quality Criteria and Heterocyclic Aromatic Amine Formation in Beef Steak
Herein, the effect of the dipping (static) marination process (at 4 °C for 2 h) with different types of vinegar (balsamic, pomegranate, apple, and grape) on various quality properties, including texture and protein profile of beef steaks and the formation of heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs) in be...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9602021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37431000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11203251 |
_version_ | 1784817209771556864 |
---|---|
author | Fencioglu, Halenur Oz, Emel Turhan, Sadettin Proestos, Charalampos Oz, Fatih |
author_facet | Fencioglu, Halenur Oz, Emel Turhan, Sadettin Proestos, Charalampos Oz, Fatih |
author_sort | Fencioglu, Halenur |
collection | PubMed |
description | Herein, the effect of the dipping (static) marination process (at 4 °C for 2 h) with different types of vinegar (balsamic, pomegranate, apple, and grape) on various quality properties, including texture and protein profile of beef steaks and the formation of heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs) in beef steaks cooked on a hot plate (at 200 °C for 24 min), were determined. The results showed that 3.12–4.13% of the marinate liquids were absorbed by beef steak as a result of the marination process. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between the marinated and cooked beef steaks in terms of water content, cooking loss, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) value, hardness, cohesiveness, and chewiness. However, significant differences were detected in terms of pH value and color values (L*, a*, and b*) (p < 0.01), and springiness, 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo (4,5-f) quinoxaline (MeIQx) and total HAA content (p < 0.05). The marination with pomegranate vinegar resulted in the formation of darker steak, while a lighter one was obtained when apple vinegar was used in the marination. The use of balsamic and grape vinegar in the marination process decreased the springiness value compared to the control group. The myofibrillar proteins of beef steaks marinated with different types of vinegar generally showed a similar sodium dodecyl-sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) profile. However, some differences were observed in the band density of some proteins depending on the trial and the type of marination. In this study, of the nine examined HAAs, only two (2-amino-3-methylimidazo (4,5-f) quinoline (IQ) and MeIQx) could be detected and quantified. IQ was detected only in the control group steak (up to 0.51 ng/g), while MeIQx was detected in all treatment groups (up to 2.22 ng/g). The total HAA content varied between 0.59–2.22 ng/g. It was determined that the marination process with different vinegar types had different effects on the total HAA content of the steaks. Using balsamic and apple vinegar in the marination process decreased the total HAA content compared to the control group, but this decrease was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). On the other hand, using grape and pomegranate vinegar in the marination process increased the total HAA content, but this increase was only significant (p < 0.05) in the marination with pomegranate vinegar. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9602021 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96020212022-10-27 The Effects of the Marination Process with Different Vinegar Varieties on Various Quality Criteria and Heterocyclic Aromatic Amine Formation in Beef Steak Fencioglu, Halenur Oz, Emel Turhan, Sadettin Proestos, Charalampos Oz, Fatih Foods Article Herein, the effect of the dipping (static) marination process (at 4 °C for 2 h) with different types of vinegar (balsamic, pomegranate, apple, and grape) on various quality properties, including texture and protein profile of beef steaks and the formation of heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs) in beef steaks cooked on a hot plate (at 200 °C for 24 min), were determined. The results showed that 3.12–4.13% of the marinate liquids were absorbed by beef steak as a result of the marination process. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between the marinated and cooked beef steaks in terms of water content, cooking loss, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) value, hardness, cohesiveness, and chewiness. However, significant differences were detected in terms of pH value and color values (L*, a*, and b*) (p < 0.01), and springiness, 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo (4,5-f) quinoxaline (MeIQx) and total HAA content (p < 0.05). The marination with pomegranate vinegar resulted in the formation of darker steak, while a lighter one was obtained when apple vinegar was used in the marination. The use of balsamic and grape vinegar in the marination process decreased the springiness value compared to the control group. The myofibrillar proteins of beef steaks marinated with different types of vinegar generally showed a similar sodium dodecyl-sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) profile. However, some differences were observed in the band density of some proteins depending on the trial and the type of marination. In this study, of the nine examined HAAs, only two (2-amino-3-methylimidazo (4,5-f) quinoline (IQ) and MeIQx) could be detected and quantified. IQ was detected only in the control group steak (up to 0.51 ng/g), while MeIQx was detected in all treatment groups (up to 2.22 ng/g). The total HAA content varied between 0.59–2.22 ng/g. It was determined that the marination process with different vinegar types had different effects on the total HAA content of the steaks. Using balsamic and apple vinegar in the marination process decreased the total HAA content compared to the control group, but this decrease was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). On the other hand, using grape and pomegranate vinegar in the marination process increased the total HAA content, but this increase was only significant (p < 0.05) in the marination with pomegranate vinegar. MDPI 2022-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9602021/ /pubmed/37431000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11203251 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Fencioglu, Halenur Oz, Emel Turhan, Sadettin Proestos, Charalampos Oz, Fatih The Effects of the Marination Process with Different Vinegar Varieties on Various Quality Criteria and Heterocyclic Aromatic Amine Formation in Beef Steak |
title | The Effects of the Marination Process with Different Vinegar Varieties on Various Quality Criteria and Heterocyclic Aromatic Amine Formation in Beef Steak |
title_full | The Effects of the Marination Process with Different Vinegar Varieties on Various Quality Criteria and Heterocyclic Aromatic Amine Formation in Beef Steak |
title_fullStr | The Effects of the Marination Process with Different Vinegar Varieties on Various Quality Criteria and Heterocyclic Aromatic Amine Formation in Beef Steak |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effects of the Marination Process with Different Vinegar Varieties on Various Quality Criteria and Heterocyclic Aromatic Amine Formation in Beef Steak |
title_short | The Effects of the Marination Process with Different Vinegar Varieties on Various Quality Criteria and Heterocyclic Aromatic Amine Formation in Beef Steak |
title_sort | effects of the marination process with different vinegar varieties on various quality criteria and heterocyclic aromatic amine formation in beef steak |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9602021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37431000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11203251 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fenciogluhalenur theeffectsofthemarinationprocesswithdifferentvinegarvarietiesonvariousqualitycriteriaandheterocyclicaromaticamineformationinbeefsteak AT ozemel theeffectsofthemarinationprocesswithdifferentvinegarvarietiesonvariousqualitycriteriaandheterocyclicaromaticamineformationinbeefsteak AT turhansadettin theeffectsofthemarinationprocesswithdifferentvinegarvarietiesonvariousqualitycriteriaandheterocyclicaromaticamineformationinbeefsteak AT proestoscharalampos theeffectsofthemarinationprocesswithdifferentvinegarvarietiesonvariousqualitycriteriaandheterocyclicaromaticamineformationinbeefsteak AT ozfatih theeffectsofthemarinationprocesswithdifferentvinegarvarietiesonvariousqualitycriteriaandheterocyclicaromaticamineformationinbeefsteak AT fenciogluhalenur effectsofthemarinationprocesswithdifferentvinegarvarietiesonvariousqualitycriteriaandheterocyclicaromaticamineformationinbeefsteak AT ozemel effectsofthemarinationprocesswithdifferentvinegarvarietiesonvariousqualitycriteriaandheterocyclicaromaticamineformationinbeefsteak AT turhansadettin effectsofthemarinationprocesswithdifferentvinegarvarietiesonvariousqualitycriteriaandheterocyclicaromaticamineformationinbeefsteak AT proestoscharalampos effectsofthemarinationprocesswithdifferentvinegarvarietiesonvariousqualitycriteriaandheterocyclicaromaticamineformationinbeefsteak AT ozfatih effectsofthemarinationprocesswithdifferentvinegarvarietiesonvariousqualitycriteriaandheterocyclicaromaticamineformationinbeefsteak |