Cargando…
Positive Psychology Approaches to Interventions for Cancer Dyads: A Scoping Review
Objective: Positive psychology approaches (PPAs) to interventions focus on developing positive cognitions, emotions, and behavior. Benefits of these interventions may be compounded when delivered to interdependent dyads. However, dyadic interventions involving PPAs are relatively new in the cancer c...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9602591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36294142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013561 |
_version_ | 1784817356488310784 |
---|---|
author | Otto, Amy K. Ketcher, Dana Reblin, Maija Terrill, Alexandra L. |
author_facet | Otto, Amy K. Ketcher, Dana Reblin, Maija Terrill, Alexandra L. |
author_sort | Otto, Amy K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Positive psychology approaches (PPAs) to interventions focus on developing positive cognitions, emotions, and behavior. Benefits of these interventions may be compounded when delivered to interdependent dyads. However, dyadic interventions involving PPAs are relatively new in the cancer context. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of the available research evidence for use of dyadic PPA-based interventions in cancer and identify gaps in this literature. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a scoping review of intervention studies that included PPAs delivered to both members of an adult dyad including a cancer patient and support person (e.g., family caregiver, intimate partner). Results: Forty-eight studies, including 39 primary analyses and 28 unique interventions, were included. Most often (53.8%), the support person in the dyad was broadly defined as a “caregiver”; the most frequent specifically-defined role was spouse (41.0%). PPAs (e.g., meaning making) were often paired with other intervention components (e.g., education). Outcomes were mostly individual well-being or dyadic coping/adjustment. Conclusions: Wide variability exists in PPA type/function and their targeted outcomes. More work is needed to refine the definition/terminology and understand specific mechanisms of positive psychology approaches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9602591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96025912022-10-27 Positive Psychology Approaches to Interventions for Cancer Dyads: A Scoping Review Otto, Amy K. Ketcher, Dana Reblin, Maija Terrill, Alexandra L. Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Objective: Positive psychology approaches (PPAs) to interventions focus on developing positive cognitions, emotions, and behavior. Benefits of these interventions may be compounded when delivered to interdependent dyads. However, dyadic interventions involving PPAs are relatively new in the cancer context. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of the available research evidence for use of dyadic PPA-based interventions in cancer and identify gaps in this literature. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a scoping review of intervention studies that included PPAs delivered to both members of an adult dyad including a cancer patient and support person (e.g., family caregiver, intimate partner). Results: Forty-eight studies, including 39 primary analyses and 28 unique interventions, were included. Most often (53.8%), the support person in the dyad was broadly defined as a “caregiver”; the most frequent specifically-defined role was spouse (41.0%). PPAs (e.g., meaning making) were often paired with other intervention components (e.g., education). Outcomes were mostly individual well-being or dyadic coping/adjustment. Conclusions: Wide variability exists in PPA type/function and their targeted outcomes. More work is needed to refine the definition/terminology and understand specific mechanisms of positive psychology approaches. MDPI 2022-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9602591/ /pubmed/36294142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013561 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Otto, Amy K. Ketcher, Dana Reblin, Maija Terrill, Alexandra L. Positive Psychology Approaches to Interventions for Cancer Dyads: A Scoping Review |
title | Positive Psychology Approaches to Interventions for Cancer Dyads: A Scoping Review |
title_full | Positive Psychology Approaches to Interventions for Cancer Dyads: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Positive Psychology Approaches to Interventions for Cancer Dyads: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Positive Psychology Approaches to Interventions for Cancer Dyads: A Scoping Review |
title_short | Positive Psychology Approaches to Interventions for Cancer Dyads: A Scoping Review |
title_sort | positive psychology approaches to interventions for cancer dyads: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9602591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36294142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013561 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ottoamyk positivepsychologyapproachestointerventionsforcancerdyadsascopingreview AT ketcherdana positivepsychologyapproachestointerventionsforcancerdyadsascopingreview AT reblinmaija positivepsychologyapproachestointerventionsforcancerdyadsascopingreview AT terrillalexandral positivepsychologyapproachestointerventionsforcancerdyadsascopingreview |