Cargando…

Clinical Performance of the RealTime High Risk HPV Assay on Self-Collected Vaginal Samples within the VALHUDES Framework

The VALHUDES framework (NCT03064087) was established to evaluate the clinical accuracy of HPV testing on self-samples compared with HPV testing on matched clinician-taken cervical samples. Women referred to colposcopy due to previous cervical abnormalities were recruited at five Belgian colposcopy c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Latsuzbaia, Ardashel, Vanden Broeck, Davy, Van Keer, Severien, Weyers, Steven, Tjalma, Wiebren A. A., Doyen, Jean, Donders, Gilbert, De Sutter, Philippe, Vorsters, Alex, Peeters, Eliana, Arbyn, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9602690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36047900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01631-22
_version_ 1784817381809324032
author Latsuzbaia, Ardashel
Vanden Broeck, Davy
Van Keer, Severien
Weyers, Steven
Tjalma, Wiebren A. A.
Doyen, Jean
Donders, Gilbert
De Sutter, Philippe
Vorsters, Alex
Peeters, Eliana
Arbyn, Marc
author_facet Latsuzbaia, Ardashel
Vanden Broeck, Davy
Van Keer, Severien
Weyers, Steven
Tjalma, Wiebren A. A.
Doyen, Jean
Donders, Gilbert
De Sutter, Philippe
Vorsters, Alex
Peeters, Eliana
Arbyn, Marc
author_sort Latsuzbaia, Ardashel
collection PubMed
description The VALHUDES framework (NCT03064087) was established to evaluate the clinical accuracy of HPV testing on self-samples compared with HPV testing on matched clinician-taken cervical samples. Women referred to colposcopy due to previous cervical abnormalities were recruited at five Belgian colposcopy centers. A total of 486 pairs of matched cervical samples and vaginal self-samples were included in the analysis (228 collected with Evalyn Brush and 258 with Qvintip). The dry vaginal brushes were transferred into 20 mL ThinPrep PreservCyt solution. All specimens were tested with the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV assay (Abbott RT). Testing on vaginal and cervical specimens was considered the index and comparator tests, respectively, and colposcopy and histology as the reference standard. The clinical sensitivity for CIN2+ of Abbott RT (cutoff ≤32 cycle number [CN]) on vaginal self-samples (Evalyn Brush and Qvintip combined) was 8% lower than on the cervical clinician-collected samples (ratio = 0.92 [95% CI, 0.87 to 0.98]), while the specificity was similar (ratio = 1.04 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.12]). Sensitivity (ratio = 0.95 [95% CI, 0.89 to 1.02]) and specificity (ratio = 1.11 [95% CI, 0.995 to 1.23]) on Evalyn Brush samples was similar to cervical, while on Qvintip samples, the sensitivity was 12% lower than cervical samples (ratio = 0.88 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.998]) with similar specificity (0.99 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.10]). Exploratory cutoff optimization (cutoff ≤35 CN) resulted in an improvement of the relative sensitivity (self-sampling versus clinician sampling: ratio = 0.96 [95% CI, 0.91 to 1.02]) but yielded a loss in relative specificity (ratio = 0.92 [0.85 to 1.00]). The clinical accuracy of Abbott RT differed from the self-sampling device. However, after cutoff optimization, the sensitivity on self-samples taken with either of two vaginal brushes became similar to clinician-collected samples. IMPORTANCE Self-samples are becoming a crucial part of HPV-based cervical cancer screening programs to reach nonattendee women and increase screening coverage. Therefore, the VALHUDES framework was established to validate and evaluate HPV tests and devices on self-samples. Here, in the present manuscript, we evaluated the accuracy of the RealTime High Risk HPV assay (Abbott RT) on two different vaginal devices to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade two or higher (CIN2+). The study results demonstrated that the Abbott RT assay is similarly accurate on vaginal self-samples as on matched clinician-taken cervical samples after adjusting cutoff values. Moreover, we observed that some vaginal devices perform better than others in CIN2+ detection. We also underline the necessity of standardization and validation of general workflow and sample handling procedures for vaginal self-samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9602690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96026902022-10-27 Clinical Performance of the RealTime High Risk HPV Assay on Self-Collected Vaginal Samples within the VALHUDES Framework Latsuzbaia, Ardashel Vanden Broeck, Davy Van Keer, Severien Weyers, Steven Tjalma, Wiebren A. A. Doyen, Jean Donders, Gilbert De Sutter, Philippe Vorsters, Alex Peeters, Eliana Arbyn, Marc Microbiol Spectr Research Article The VALHUDES framework (NCT03064087) was established to evaluate the clinical accuracy of HPV testing on self-samples compared with HPV testing on matched clinician-taken cervical samples. Women referred to colposcopy due to previous cervical abnormalities were recruited at five Belgian colposcopy centers. A total of 486 pairs of matched cervical samples and vaginal self-samples were included in the analysis (228 collected with Evalyn Brush and 258 with Qvintip). The dry vaginal brushes were transferred into 20 mL ThinPrep PreservCyt solution. All specimens were tested with the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV assay (Abbott RT). Testing on vaginal and cervical specimens was considered the index and comparator tests, respectively, and colposcopy and histology as the reference standard. The clinical sensitivity for CIN2+ of Abbott RT (cutoff ≤32 cycle number [CN]) on vaginal self-samples (Evalyn Brush and Qvintip combined) was 8% lower than on the cervical clinician-collected samples (ratio = 0.92 [95% CI, 0.87 to 0.98]), while the specificity was similar (ratio = 1.04 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.12]). Sensitivity (ratio = 0.95 [95% CI, 0.89 to 1.02]) and specificity (ratio = 1.11 [95% CI, 0.995 to 1.23]) on Evalyn Brush samples was similar to cervical, while on Qvintip samples, the sensitivity was 12% lower than cervical samples (ratio = 0.88 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.998]) with similar specificity (0.99 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.10]). Exploratory cutoff optimization (cutoff ≤35 CN) resulted in an improvement of the relative sensitivity (self-sampling versus clinician sampling: ratio = 0.96 [95% CI, 0.91 to 1.02]) but yielded a loss in relative specificity (ratio = 0.92 [0.85 to 1.00]). The clinical accuracy of Abbott RT differed from the self-sampling device. However, after cutoff optimization, the sensitivity on self-samples taken with either of two vaginal brushes became similar to clinician-collected samples. IMPORTANCE Self-samples are becoming a crucial part of HPV-based cervical cancer screening programs to reach nonattendee women and increase screening coverage. Therefore, the VALHUDES framework was established to validate and evaluate HPV tests and devices on self-samples. Here, in the present manuscript, we evaluated the accuracy of the RealTime High Risk HPV assay (Abbott RT) on two different vaginal devices to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade two or higher (CIN2+). The study results demonstrated that the Abbott RT assay is similarly accurate on vaginal self-samples as on matched clinician-taken cervical samples after adjusting cutoff values. Moreover, we observed that some vaginal devices perform better than others in CIN2+ detection. We also underline the necessity of standardization and validation of general workflow and sample handling procedures for vaginal self-samples. American Society for Microbiology 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9602690/ /pubmed/36047900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01631-22 Text en Copyright © 2022 Latsuzbaia et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Latsuzbaia, Ardashel
Vanden Broeck, Davy
Van Keer, Severien
Weyers, Steven
Tjalma, Wiebren A. A.
Doyen, Jean
Donders, Gilbert
De Sutter, Philippe
Vorsters, Alex
Peeters, Eliana
Arbyn, Marc
Clinical Performance of the RealTime High Risk HPV Assay on Self-Collected Vaginal Samples within the VALHUDES Framework
title Clinical Performance of the RealTime High Risk HPV Assay on Self-Collected Vaginal Samples within the VALHUDES Framework
title_full Clinical Performance of the RealTime High Risk HPV Assay on Self-Collected Vaginal Samples within the VALHUDES Framework
title_fullStr Clinical Performance of the RealTime High Risk HPV Assay on Self-Collected Vaginal Samples within the VALHUDES Framework
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Performance of the RealTime High Risk HPV Assay on Self-Collected Vaginal Samples within the VALHUDES Framework
title_short Clinical Performance of the RealTime High Risk HPV Assay on Self-Collected Vaginal Samples within the VALHUDES Framework
title_sort clinical performance of the realtime high risk hpv assay on self-collected vaginal samples within the valhudes framework
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9602690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36047900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01631-22
work_keys_str_mv AT latsuzbaiaardashel clinicalperformanceoftherealtimehighriskhpvassayonselfcollectedvaginalsampleswithinthevalhudesframework
AT vandenbroeckdavy clinicalperformanceoftherealtimehighriskhpvassayonselfcollectedvaginalsampleswithinthevalhudesframework
AT vankeerseverien clinicalperformanceoftherealtimehighriskhpvassayonselfcollectedvaginalsampleswithinthevalhudesframework
AT weyerssteven clinicalperformanceoftherealtimehighriskhpvassayonselfcollectedvaginalsampleswithinthevalhudesframework
AT tjalmawiebrenaa clinicalperformanceoftherealtimehighriskhpvassayonselfcollectedvaginalsampleswithinthevalhudesframework
AT doyenjean clinicalperformanceoftherealtimehighriskhpvassayonselfcollectedvaginalsampleswithinthevalhudesframework
AT dondersgilbert clinicalperformanceoftherealtimehighriskhpvassayonselfcollectedvaginalsampleswithinthevalhudesframework
AT desutterphilippe clinicalperformanceoftherealtimehighriskhpvassayonselfcollectedvaginalsampleswithinthevalhudesframework
AT vorstersalex clinicalperformanceoftherealtimehighriskhpvassayonselfcollectedvaginalsampleswithinthevalhudesframework
AT peeterseliana clinicalperformanceoftherealtimehighriskhpvassayonselfcollectedvaginalsampleswithinthevalhudesframework
AT arbynmarc clinicalperformanceoftherealtimehighriskhpvassayonselfcollectedvaginalsampleswithinthevalhudesframework