Cargando…

Differences According to Sex in the Relationship between Social Participation and Well-Being: A Network Analysis

This study aimed to explore the effects of different types of social participation on the components of well-being, as well as the differences according to sex in the relationship between social participation and well-being. This was a cross-sectional community study. Well-being was measured using t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Di, Li, Guopeng, Zhou, Miao, Wang, Qing, Gao, Yiming, Zhao, Xiangyu, Zhang, Xinting, Li, Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9602840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36293720
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013135
_version_ 1784817413981732864
author Zhao, Di
Li, Guopeng
Zhou, Miao
Wang, Qing
Gao, Yiming
Zhao, Xiangyu
Zhang, Xinting
Li, Ping
author_facet Zhao, Di
Li, Guopeng
Zhou, Miao
Wang, Qing
Gao, Yiming
Zhao, Xiangyu
Zhang, Xinting
Li, Ping
author_sort Zhao, Di
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to explore the effects of different types of social participation on the components of well-being, as well as the differences according to sex in the relationship between social participation and well-being. This was a cross-sectional community study. Well-being was measured using the positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment (PERMA) profile. Social participation included activities of daily life, sports and entertainment activities, and social service activities. The independent association between each type of social participation and the components of well-being was examined by using a network analysis in both males and females. Of all 1276 participants surveyed, 60% were females. The results of the network analysis showed that positive emotion–housework (0.263), positive emotion–games (0.102), engagement–housework (0.107), engagement–work (0.054), and meaning–socializing (0.085) had unique connections in males; the average predictability in the network was 0.417. For females, positive emotion–physical activity (0.102), engagement–associations or societies (0.071), relationships–physical (0.090), relationships–socializing (0.092), and relationships–volunteering activities (0.133) had significant connections; the average predictability in the network was 0.358. Different types of social participation may have different effects on the components of well-being. Furthermore, differences according to sex in the relationship between social participation and well-being should be considered when formulating interventions to improve well-being.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9602840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96028402022-10-27 Differences According to Sex in the Relationship between Social Participation and Well-Being: A Network Analysis Zhao, Di Li, Guopeng Zhou, Miao Wang, Qing Gao, Yiming Zhao, Xiangyu Zhang, Xinting Li, Ping Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This study aimed to explore the effects of different types of social participation on the components of well-being, as well as the differences according to sex in the relationship between social participation and well-being. This was a cross-sectional community study. Well-being was measured using the positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment (PERMA) profile. Social participation included activities of daily life, sports and entertainment activities, and social service activities. The independent association between each type of social participation and the components of well-being was examined by using a network analysis in both males and females. Of all 1276 participants surveyed, 60% were females. The results of the network analysis showed that positive emotion–housework (0.263), positive emotion–games (0.102), engagement–housework (0.107), engagement–work (0.054), and meaning–socializing (0.085) had unique connections in males; the average predictability in the network was 0.417. For females, positive emotion–physical activity (0.102), engagement–associations or societies (0.071), relationships–physical (0.090), relationships–socializing (0.092), and relationships–volunteering activities (0.133) had significant connections; the average predictability in the network was 0.358. Different types of social participation may have different effects on the components of well-being. Furthermore, differences according to sex in the relationship between social participation and well-being should be considered when formulating interventions to improve well-being. MDPI 2022-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9602840/ /pubmed/36293720 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013135 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhao, Di
Li, Guopeng
Zhou, Miao
Wang, Qing
Gao, Yiming
Zhao, Xiangyu
Zhang, Xinting
Li, Ping
Differences According to Sex in the Relationship between Social Participation and Well-Being: A Network Analysis
title Differences According to Sex in the Relationship between Social Participation and Well-Being: A Network Analysis
title_full Differences According to Sex in the Relationship between Social Participation and Well-Being: A Network Analysis
title_fullStr Differences According to Sex in the Relationship between Social Participation and Well-Being: A Network Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Differences According to Sex in the Relationship between Social Participation and Well-Being: A Network Analysis
title_short Differences According to Sex in the Relationship between Social Participation and Well-Being: A Network Analysis
title_sort differences according to sex in the relationship between social participation and well-being: a network analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9602840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36293720
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013135
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaodi differencesaccordingtosexintherelationshipbetweensocialparticipationandwellbeinganetworkanalysis
AT liguopeng differencesaccordingtosexintherelationshipbetweensocialparticipationandwellbeinganetworkanalysis
AT zhoumiao differencesaccordingtosexintherelationshipbetweensocialparticipationandwellbeinganetworkanalysis
AT wangqing differencesaccordingtosexintherelationshipbetweensocialparticipationandwellbeinganetworkanalysis
AT gaoyiming differencesaccordingtosexintherelationshipbetweensocialparticipationandwellbeinganetworkanalysis
AT zhaoxiangyu differencesaccordingtosexintherelationshipbetweensocialparticipationandwellbeinganetworkanalysis
AT zhangxinting differencesaccordingtosexintherelationshipbetweensocialparticipationandwellbeinganetworkanalysis
AT liping differencesaccordingtosexintherelationshipbetweensocialparticipationandwellbeinganetworkanalysis