Cargando…

Does Intrauterine Injection of hCG Improve IVF Outcome? A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis

Various interventions have been proposed to improve embryo implantation in IVF. Among these, intrauterine injections of human chorionic gonadotropin seem to have promising results. Consequently, we conducted a review and meta-analysis to assess IVF outcomes by comparing couples who underwent intraut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conforti, Alessandro, Longobardi, Salvatore, Carbone, Luigi, Iorio, Giuseppe Gabriele, Cariati, Federica, Campitiello, Maria Rosaria, Strina, Ida, Palese, Michela, D’Hooghe, Thomas, Alviggi, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9603006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36293052
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012193
_version_ 1784817445354078208
author Conforti, Alessandro
Longobardi, Salvatore
Carbone, Luigi
Iorio, Giuseppe Gabriele
Cariati, Federica
Campitiello, Maria Rosaria
Strina, Ida
Palese, Michela
D’Hooghe, Thomas
Alviggi, Carlo
author_facet Conforti, Alessandro
Longobardi, Salvatore
Carbone, Luigi
Iorio, Giuseppe Gabriele
Cariati, Federica
Campitiello, Maria Rosaria
Strina, Ida
Palese, Michela
D’Hooghe, Thomas
Alviggi, Carlo
author_sort Conforti, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description Various interventions have been proposed to improve embryo implantation in IVF. Among these, intrauterine injections of human chorionic gonadotropin seem to have promising results. Consequently, we conducted a review and meta-analysis to assess IVF outcomes by comparing couples who underwent intrauterine hCG injection transfer versus those who underwent embryo transfer with intrauterine injection of placebo, or without any additional intervention. The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes were the implantation rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate. A meta-analysis was conducted using the random effects model, while bias within studies was detected using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Ectopic pregnancies and stillbirths were also assessed. The clinical pregnancy (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.17–1.62, p < 0.0001) and implantation rate (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.12–1.75, p = 0.003) were significantly higher in women who underwent hCG injection than in the control group. These significant effects persisted only in women who underwent cleavage-stage embryo transfer. No significant differences between groups were observed in the other secondary outcomes. In conclusion, our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that intrauterine injection of hCG could be a valuable approach in women who undergo cleavage-stage embryo transfer. Given the lack of data about the live birth rate, caution should be exercised in interpreting these data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9603006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96030062022-10-27 Does Intrauterine Injection of hCG Improve IVF Outcome? A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis Conforti, Alessandro Longobardi, Salvatore Carbone, Luigi Iorio, Giuseppe Gabriele Cariati, Federica Campitiello, Maria Rosaria Strina, Ida Palese, Michela D’Hooghe, Thomas Alviggi, Carlo Int J Mol Sci Review Various interventions have been proposed to improve embryo implantation in IVF. Among these, intrauterine injections of human chorionic gonadotropin seem to have promising results. Consequently, we conducted a review and meta-analysis to assess IVF outcomes by comparing couples who underwent intrauterine hCG injection transfer versus those who underwent embryo transfer with intrauterine injection of placebo, or without any additional intervention. The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes were the implantation rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate. A meta-analysis was conducted using the random effects model, while bias within studies was detected using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Ectopic pregnancies and stillbirths were also assessed. The clinical pregnancy (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.17–1.62, p < 0.0001) and implantation rate (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.12–1.75, p = 0.003) were significantly higher in women who underwent hCG injection than in the control group. These significant effects persisted only in women who underwent cleavage-stage embryo transfer. No significant differences between groups were observed in the other secondary outcomes. In conclusion, our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that intrauterine injection of hCG could be a valuable approach in women who undergo cleavage-stage embryo transfer. Given the lack of data about the live birth rate, caution should be exercised in interpreting these data. MDPI 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9603006/ /pubmed/36293052 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012193 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Conforti, Alessandro
Longobardi, Salvatore
Carbone, Luigi
Iorio, Giuseppe Gabriele
Cariati, Federica
Campitiello, Maria Rosaria
Strina, Ida
Palese, Michela
D’Hooghe, Thomas
Alviggi, Carlo
Does Intrauterine Injection of hCG Improve IVF Outcome? A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis
title Does Intrauterine Injection of hCG Improve IVF Outcome? A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis
title_full Does Intrauterine Injection of hCG Improve IVF Outcome? A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Does Intrauterine Injection of hCG Improve IVF Outcome? A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Does Intrauterine Injection of hCG Improve IVF Outcome? A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis
title_short Does Intrauterine Injection of hCG Improve IVF Outcome? A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis
title_sort does intrauterine injection of hcg improve ivf outcome? a systematic review and a meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9603006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36293052
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012193
work_keys_str_mv AT confortialessandro doesintrauterineinjectionofhcgimproveivfoutcomeasystematicreviewandametaanalysis
AT longobardisalvatore doesintrauterineinjectionofhcgimproveivfoutcomeasystematicreviewandametaanalysis
AT carboneluigi doesintrauterineinjectionofhcgimproveivfoutcomeasystematicreviewandametaanalysis
AT ioriogiuseppegabriele doesintrauterineinjectionofhcgimproveivfoutcomeasystematicreviewandametaanalysis
AT cariatifederica doesintrauterineinjectionofhcgimproveivfoutcomeasystematicreviewandametaanalysis
AT campitiellomariarosaria doesintrauterineinjectionofhcgimproveivfoutcomeasystematicreviewandametaanalysis
AT strinaida doesintrauterineinjectionofhcgimproveivfoutcomeasystematicreviewandametaanalysis
AT palesemichela doesintrauterineinjectionofhcgimproveivfoutcomeasystematicreviewandametaanalysis
AT dhooghethomas doesintrauterineinjectionofhcgimproveivfoutcomeasystematicreviewandametaanalysis
AT alviggicarlo doesintrauterineinjectionofhcgimproveivfoutcomeasystematicreviewandametaanalysis