Cargando…
Does Intrauterine Injection of hCG Improve IVF Outcome? A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis
Various interventions have been proposed to improve embryo implantation in IVF. Among these, intrauterine injections of human chorionic gonadotropin seem to have promising results. Consequently, we conducted a review and meta-analysis to assess IVF outcomes by comparing couples who underwent intraut...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9603006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36293052 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012193 |
_version_ | 1784817445354078208 |
---|---|
author | Conforti, Alessandro Longobardi, Salvatore Carbone, Luigi Iorio, Giuseppe Gabriele Cariati, Federica Campitiello, Maria Rosaria Strina, Ida Palese, Michela D’Hooghe, Thomas Alviggi, Carlo |
author_facet | Conforti, Alessandro Longobardi, Salvatore Carbone, Luigi Iorio, Giuseppe Gabriele Cariati, Federica Campitiello, Maria Rosaria Strina, Ida Palese, Michela D’Hooghe, Thomas Alviggi, Carlo |
author_sort | Conforti, Alessandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Various interventions have been proposed to improve embryo implantation in IVF. Among these, intrauterine injections of human chorionic gonadotropin seem to have promising results. Consequently, we conducted a review and meta-analysis to assess IVF outcomes by comparing couples who underwent intrauterine hCG injection transfer versus those who underwent embryo transfer with intrauterine injection of placebo, or without any additional intervention. The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes were the implantation rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate. A meta-analysis was conducted using the random effects model, while bias within studies was detected using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Ectopic pregnancies and stillbirths were also assessed. The clinical pregnancy (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.17–1.62, p < 0.0001) and implantation rate (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.12–1.75, p = 0.003) were significantly higher in women who underwent hCG injection than in the control group. These significant effects persisted only in women who underwent cleavage-stage embryo transfer. No significant differences between groups were observed in the other secondary outcomes. In conclusion, our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that intrauterine injection of hCG could be a valuable approach in women who undergo cleavage-stage embryo transfer. Given the lack of data about the live birth rate, caution should be exercised in interpreting these data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9603006 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96030062022-10-27 Does Intrauterine Injection of hCG Improve IVF Outcome? A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis Conforti, Alessandro Longobardi, Salvatore Carbone, Luigi Iorio, Giuseppe Gabriele Cariati, Federica Campitiello, Maria Rosaria Strina, Ida Palese, Michela D’Hooghe, Thomas Alviggi, Carlo Int J Mol Sci Review Various interventions have been proposed to improve embryo implantation in IVF. Among these, intrauterine injections of human chorionic gonadotropin seem to have promising results. Consequently, we conducted a review and meta-analysis to assess IVF outcomes by comparing couples who underwent intrauterine hCG injection transfer versus those who underwent embryo transfer with intrauterine injection of placebo, or without any additional intervention. The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes were the implantation rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate. A meta-analysis was conducted using the random effects model, while bias within studies was detected using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Ectopic pregnancies and stillbirths were also assessed. The clinical pregnancy (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.17–1.62, p < 0.0001) and implantation rate (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.12–1.75, p = 0.003) were significantly higher in women who underwent hCG injection than in the control group. These significant effects persisted only in women who underwent cleavage-stage embryo transfer. No significant differences between groups were observed in the other secondary outcomes. In conclusion, our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that intrauterine injection of hCG could be a valuable approach in women who undergo cleavage-stage embryo transfer. Given the lack of data about the live birth rate, caution should be exercised in interpreting these data. MDPI 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9603006/ /pubmed/36293052 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012193 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Conforti, Alessandro Longobardi, Salvatore Carbone, Luigi Iorio, Giuseppe Gabriele Cariati, Federica Campitiello, Maria Rosaria Strina, Ida Palese, Michela D’Hooghe, Thomas Alviggi, Carlo Does Intrauterine Injection of hCG Improve IVF Outcome? A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis |
title | Does Intrauterine Injection of hCG Improve IVF Outcome? A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Does Intrauterine Injection of hCG Improve IVF Outcome? A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Does Intrauterine Injection of hCG Improve IVF Outcome? A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Intrauterine Injection of hCG Improve IVF Outcome? A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Does Intrauterine Injection of hCG Improve IVF Outcome? A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | does intrauterine injection of hcg improve ivf outcome? a systematic review and a meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9603006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36293052 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012193 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT confortialessandro doesintrauterineinjectionofhcgimproveivfoutcomeasystematicreviewandametaanalysis AT longobardisalvatore doesintrauterineinjectionofhcgimproveivfoutcomeasystematicreviewandametaanalysis AT carboneluigi doesintrauterineinjectionofhcgimproveivfoutcomeasystematicreviewandametaanalysis AT ioriogiuseppegabriele doesintrauterineinjectionofhcgimproveivfoutcomeasystematicreviewandametaanalysis AT cariatifederica doesintrauterineinjectionofhcgimproveivfoutcomeasystematicreviewandametaanalysis AT campitiellomariarosaria doesintrauterineinjectionofhcgimproveivfoutcomeasystematicreviewandametaanalysis AT strinaida doesintrauterineinjectionofhcgimproveivfoutcomeasystematicreviewandametaanalysis AT palesemichela doesintrauterineinjectionofhcgimproveivfoutcomeasystematicreviewandametaanalysis AT dhooghethomas doesintrauterineinjectionofhcgimproveivfoutcomeasystematicreviewandametaanalysis AT alviggicarlo doesintrauterineinjectionofhcgimproveivfoutcomeasystematicreviewandametaanalysis |