Cargando…

Evaluating the Dual-Target Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx Assay: Comparison between Viral Loads Measured with pol and LTR Targets in the Same Samples

For effective management of HIV-1 patients, accurate measurement of HIV-1-RNA viral load (VL) is fundamental. The latest generation molecular assays for monitoring VL perform simultaneous detection of two regions of the viral genome, but without specifying the target used for VL quantitation. By usi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sberna, Giuseppe, Sarti, Silvia, Cicalini, Stefania, Antinori, Andrea, Garbuglia, Anna Rosa, Amendola, Alessandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9603300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36066258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01361-22
_version_ 1784817515321360384
author Sberna, Giuseppe
Sarti, Silvia
Cicalini, Stefania
Antinori, Andrea
Garbuglia, Anna Rosa
Amendola, Alessandra
author_facet Sberna, Giuseppe
Sarti, Silvia
Cicalini, Stefania
Antinori, Andrea
Garbuglia, Anna Rosa
Amendola, Alessandra
author_sort Sberna, Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description For effective management of HIV-1 patients, accurate measurement of HIV-1-RNA viral load (VL) is fundamental. The latest generation molecular assays for monitoring VL perform simultaneous detection of two regions of the viral genome, but without specifying the target used for VL quantitation. By using the “open” software (research use only [RUO]) of Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx Assay (Aptima) which provides both results obtained with the pol and LTR targets, we were able to compare n = 500 plasma samples results from chronically HIV-1-infected patients under antiretroviral therapy (ART). Correlation and concordance were analyzed. By stratifying VL into two groups (<30 and ≥30 copies/mL HIV-1-RNA) according to pol-based results and matching them with their respective LTR values, concordance was substantial (κ = 0.635; 95%CI = 0.569 to 0.700) as expected. Considering the specimens (n = 224) with VL exactly quantified (i.e., ≥30 copies/mL) with both targets, an optimal correlation subsisted (r = 0.8882; P < 0.0001) and Bland-Altman plot showed no significant mean difference between them. However, by stratifying all these data in three ranges (30 to 200, 201 to 1,000, and >1,000 copies/mL) according to pol-based results, concordance analysis showed fair agreement (κ = 0.344; 95%CI = 0.257 to 0.432). Indeed, after excluding mutually concordant VL values in each range (n = 134), the remaining discordant samples (n = 90; 40.1%) showed significant (P < 0.05) difference between VL measured with the two targets. With the Aptima “open” software, samples with pol-based VL <1,000 copies (cp)/mL HIV-1-RNA, the corresponding LTR values were on average 0.5 log(10) cp/mL higher. Further studies on these discrepancies and the nature of viral RNA elements detected only with the LTR despite efficient ART are in progress. IMPORTANCE The last generation dual-target platforms for quantification of HIV-1 RNA return a single value of viral load (VL) derived from a combined reading of two HIV-1 genome targets. By using a modified version of Aptima software, providing both the VL results obtained from pol and LTR amplification separately, we observed discordant VL results in some samples from HIV-1-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy. In particular, some samples with pol-based quantified <1,000 copies/mL VL showed the LTR-based value on average 0.5 log(10) copies/mL higher, and other samples, always by treated patients, showed VL exclusively quantified with LTR target while the corresponding pol-based VL results were completely undetected. Standard software of double-target based diagnostic systems does not allow recognizing discrepant VL values in these particular, but not rare, clinical specimens. This issue could have implications for clinical management by leading physicians to consider changing antiretroviral regimen based on presumed failure of antiretroviral therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9603300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96033002022-10-27 Evaluating the Dual-Target Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx Assay: Comparison between Viral Loads Measured with pol and LTR Targets in the Same Samples Sberna, Giuseppe Sarti, Silvia Cicalini, Stefania Antinori, Andrea Garbuglia, Anna Rosa Amendola, Alessandra Microbiol Spectr Research Article For effective management of HIV-1 patients, accurate measurement of HIV-1-RNA viral load (VL) is fundamental. The latest generation molecular assays for monitoring VL perform simultaneous detection of two regions of the viral genome, but without specifying the target used for VL quantitation. By using the “open” software (research use only [RUO]) of Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx Assay (Aptima) which provides both results obtained with the pol and LTR targets, we were able to compare n = 500 plasma samples results from chronically HIV-1-infected patients under antiretroviral therapy (ART). Correlation and concordance were analyzed. By stratifying VL into two groups (<30 and ≥30 copies/mL HIV-1-RNA) according to pol-based results and matching them with their respective LTR values, concordance was substantial (κ = 0.635; 95%CI = 0.569 to 0.700) as expected. Considering the specimens (n = 224) with VL exactly quantified (i.e., ≥30 copies/mL) with both targets, an optimal correlation subsisted (r = 0.8882; P < 0.0001) and Bland-Altman plot showed no significant mean difference between them. However, by stratifying all these data in three ranges (30 to 200, 201 to 1,000, and >1,000 copies/mL) according to pol-based results, concordance analysis showed fair agreement (κ = 0.344; 95%CI = 0.257 to 0.432). Indeed, after excluding mutually concordant VL values in each range (n = 134), the remaining discordant samples (n = 90; 40.1%) showed significant (P < 0.05) difference between VL measured with the two targets. With the Aptima “open” software, samples with pol-based VL <1,000 copies (cp)/mL HIV-1-RNA, the corresponding LTR values were on average 0.5 log(10) cp/mL higher. Further studies on these discrepancies and the nature of viral RNA elements detected only with the LTR despite efficient ART are in progress. IMPORTANCE The last generation dual-target platforms for quantification of HIV-1 RNA return a single value of viral load (VL) derived from a combined reading of two HIV-1 genome targets. By using a modified version of Aptima software, providing both the VL results obtained from pol and LTR amplification separately, we observed discordant VL results in some samples from HIV-1-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy. In particular, some samples with pol-based quantified <1,000 copies/mL VL showed the LTR-based value on average 0.5 log(10) copies/mL higher, and other samples, always by treated patients, showed VL exclusively quantified with LTR target while the corresponding pol-based VL results were completely undetected. Standard software of double-target based diagnostic systems does not allow recognizing discrepant VL values in these particular, but not rare, clinical specimens. This issue could have implications for clinical management by leading physicians to consider changing antiretroviral regimen based on presumed failure of antiretroviral therapy. American Society for Microbiology 2022-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9603300/ /pubmed/36066258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01361-22 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sberna et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Sberna, Giuseppe
Sarti, Silvia
Cicalini, Stefania
Antinori, Andrea
Garbuglia, Anna Rosa
Amendola, Alessandra
Evaluating the Dual-Target Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx Assay: Comparison between Viral Loads Measured with pol and LTR Targets in the Same Samples
title Evaluating the Dual-Target Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx Assay: Comparison between Viral Loads Measured with pol and LTR Targets in the Same Samples
title_full Evaluating the Dual-Target Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx Assay: Comparison between Viral Loads Measured with pol and LTR Targets in the Same Samples
title_fullStr Evaluating the Dual-Target Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx Assay: Comparison between Viral Loads Measured with pol and LTR Targets in the Same Samples
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Dual-Target Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx Assay: Comparison between Viral Loads Measured with pol and LTR Targets in the Same Samples
title_short Evaluating the Dual-Target Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx Assay: Comparison between Viral Loads Measured with pol and LTR Targets in the Same Samples
title_sort evaluating the dual-target aptima hiv-1 quant dx assay: comparison between viral loads measured with pol and ltr targets in the same samples
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9603300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36066258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01361-22
work_keys_str_mv AT sbernagiuseppe evaluatingthedualtargetaptimahiv1quantdxassaycomparisonbetweenviralloadsmeasuredwithpolandltrtargetsinthesamesamples
AT sartisilvia evaluatingthedualtargetaptimahiv1quantdxassaycomparisonbetweenviralloadsmeasuredwithpolandltrtargetsinthesamesamples
AT cicalinistefania evaluatingthedualtargetaptimahiv1quantdxassaycomparisonbetweenviralloadsmeasuredwithpolandltrtargetsinthesamesamples
AT antinoriandrea evaluatingthedualtargetaptimahiv1quantdxassaycomparisonbetweenviralloadsmeasuredwithpolandltrtargetsinthesamesamples
AT garbugliaannarosa evaluatingthedualtargetaptimahiv1quantdxassaycomparisonbetweenviralloadsmeasuredwithpolandltrtargetsinthesamesamples
AT amendolaalessandra evaluatingthedualtargetaptimahiv1quantdxassaycomparisonbetweenviralloadsmeasuredwithpolandltrtargetsinthesamesamples