Cargando…

Importance of diagnostic setting in determining mortality in patients with new-onset heart failure: temporal trends in Denmark from 1997 to 2017

AIM: To investigate temporal trends in inpatient vs. outpatient diagnosis of new-onset heart failure (HF) and the subsequent risk of death and hospitalization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using nationwide registers, 192 581 patients with a first diagnosis of HF (1997–2017) were included. We computed incide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arulmurugananthavadivel, Anojhaan, Holt, Anders, Parveen, Saaima, Lamberts, Morten, Gislason, Gunnar H, Torp-Pedersen, Christian, Madelaire, Christian, Andersson, Charlotte, Zahir, Deewa, Butt, Jawad H, Petrie, Mark C, McMurray, John, Fosbol, Emil L, Kober, Lars, Schou, Morten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9603536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34625809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab073
_version_ 1784817576152399872
author Arulmurugananthavadivel, Anojhaan
Holt, Anders
Parveen, Saaima
Lamberts, Morten
Gislason, Gunnar H
Torp-Pedersen, Christian
Madelaire, Christian
Andersson, Charlotte
Zahir, Deewa
Butt, Jawad H
Petrie, Mark C
McMurray, John
Fosbol, Emil L
Kober, Lars
Schou, Morten
author_facet Arulmurugananthavadivel, Anojhaan
Holt, Anders
Parveen, Saaima
Lamberts, Morten
Gislason, Gunnar H
Torp-Pedersen, Christian
Madelaire, Christian
Andersson, Charlotte
Zahir, Deewa
Butt, Jawad H
Petrie, Mark C
McMurray, John
Fosbol, Emil L
Kober, Lars
Schou, Morten
author_sort Arulmurugananthavadivel, Anojhaan
collection PubMed
description AIM: To investigate temporal trends in inpatient vs. outpatient diagnosis of new-onset heart failure (HF) and the subsequent risk of death and hospitalization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using nationwide registers, 192 581 patients with a first diagnosis of HF (1997–2017) were included. We computed incidences of HF, age-standardized mortality rates, and absolute risks (ARs) of death and hospitalization (accounting for competing risk of death) to understand the importance of the diagnosis setting in relation to subsequent mortality and hospitalization. The overall incidence of HF was approximately the same (170/100 000 persons) every year during 1997–2017. However, in 1997, 77% of all first diagnoses of HF were made during a hospitalization, whereas the proportion was 39% in 2017. As inpatient diagnoses decreased, outpatient diagnoses increased from 23% to 61%. Outpatients had lower mortality and hospitalization rates than inpatients throughout the study period, although the 1-year age-standardized mortality rate decreased for each inpatient (24 to 14/100-person) and outpatient (11 to 7/100-person). One-year and five-year AR of death decreased by 11.1% and 17.0%, respectively, for all HF patients, while the risk of hospitalization for HF did not decrease significantly (1.13% and 0.96%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Between 1997 and 2017, HF changed from being primarily diagnosed during hospitalization to being mostly diagnosed in the outpatient setting. Outpatients had much lower mortality rates than inpatients throughout the study period. Despite a significant decrease in mortality risk for all HF patients, neither inpatients nor outpatients experienced a reduction in the risk of an HF hospitalization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9603536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96035362022-10-31 Importance of diagnostic setting in determining mortality in patients with new-onset heart failure: temporal trends in Denmark from 1997 to 2017 Arulmurugananthavadivel, Anojhaan Holt, Anders Parveen, Saaima Lamberts, Morten Gislason, Gunnar H Torp-Pedersen, Christian Madelaire, Christian Andersson, Charlotte Zahir, Deewa Butt, Jawad H Petrie, Mark C McMurray, John Fosbol, Emil L Kober, Lars Schou, Morten Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes Original Article AIM: To investigate temporal trends in inpatient vs. outpatient diagnosis of new-onset heart failure (HF) and the subsequent risk of death and hospitalization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using nationwide registers, 192 581 patients with a first diagnosis of HF (1997–2017) were included. We computed incidences of HF, age-standardized mortality rates, and absolute risks (ARs) of death and hospitalization (accounting for competing risk of death) to understand the importance of the diagnosis setting in relation to subsequent mortality and hospitalization. The overall incidence of HF was approximately the same (170/100 000 persons) every year during 1997–2017. However, in 1997, 77% of all first diagnoses of HF were made during a hospitalization, whereas the proportion was 39% in 2017. As inpatient diagnoses decreased, outpatient diagnoses increased from 23% to 61%. Outpatients had lower mortality and hospitalization rates than inpatients throughout the study period, although the 1-year age-standardized mortality rate decreased for each inpatient (24 to 14/100-person) and outpatient (11 to 7/100-person). One-year and five-year AR of death decreased by 11.1% and 17.0%, respectively, for all HF patients, while the risk of hospitalization for HF did not decrease significantly (1.13% and 0.96%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Between 1997 and 2017, HF changed from being primarily diagnosed during hospitalization to being mostly diagnosed in the outpatient setting. Outpatients had much lower mortality rates than inpatients throughout the study period. Despite a significant decrease in mortality risk for all HF patients, neither inpatients nor outpatients experienced a reduction in the risk of an HF hospitalization. Oxford University Press 2021-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9603536/ /pubmed/34625809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab073 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Arulmurugananthavadivel, Anojhaan
Holt, Anders
Parveen, Saaima
Lamberts, Morten
Gislason, Gunnar H
Torp-Pedersen, Christian
Madelaire, Christian
Andersson, Charlotte
Zahir, Deewa
Butt, Jawad H
Petrie, Mark C
McMurray, John
Fosbol, Emil L
Kober, Lars
Schou, Morten
Importance of diagnostic setting in determining mortality in patients with new-onset heart failure: temporal trends in Denmark from 1997 to 2017
title Importance of diagnostic setting in determining mortality in patients with new-onset heart failure: temporal trends in Denmark from 1997 to 2017
title_full Importance of diagnostic setting in determining mortality in patients with new-onset heart failure: temporal trends in Denmark from 1997 to 2017
title_fullStr Importance of diagnostic setting in determining mortality in patients with new-onset heart failure: temporal trends in Denmark from 1997 to 2017
title_full_unstemmed Importance of diagnostic setting in determining mortality in patients with new-onset heart failure: temporal trends in Denmark from 1997 to 2017
title_short Importance of diagnostic setting in determining mortality in patients with new-onset heart failure: temporal trends in Denmark from 1997 to 2017
title_sort importance of diagnostic setting in determining mortality in patients with new-onset heart failure: temporal trends in denmark from 1997 to 2017
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9603536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34625809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab073
work_keys_str_mv AT arulmurugananthavadivelanojhaan importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017
AT holtanders importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017
AT parveensaaima importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017
AT lambertsmorten importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017
AT gislasongunnarh importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017
AT torppedersenchristian importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017
AT madelairechristian importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017
AT anderssoncharlotte importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017
AT zahirdeewa importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017
AT buttjawadh importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017
AT petriemarkc importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017
AT mcmurrayjohn importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017
AT fosbolemill importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017
AT koberlars importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017
AT schoumorten importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017