Cargando…
Importance of diagnostic setting in determining mortality in patients with new-onset heart failure: temporal trends in Denmark from 1997 to 2017
AIM: To investigate temporal trends in inpatient vs. outpatient diagnosis of new-onset heart failure (HF) and the subsequent risk of death and hospitalization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using nationwide registers, 192 581 patients with a first diagnosis of HF (1997–2017) were included. We computed incide...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9603536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34625809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab073 |
_version_ | 1784817576152399872 |
---|---|
author | Arulmurugananthavadivel, Anojhaan Holt, Anders Parveen, Saaima Lamberts, Morten Gislason, Gunnar H Torp-Pedersen, Christian Madelaire, Christian Andersson, Charlotte Zahir, Deewa Butt, Jawad H Petrie, Mark C McMurray, John Fosbol, Emil L Kober, Lars Schou, Morten |
author_facet | Arulmurugananthavadivel, Anojhaan Holt, Anders Parveen, Saaima Lamberts, Morten Gislason, Gunnar H Torp-Pedersen, Christian Madelaire, Christian Andersson, Charlotte Zahir, Deewa Butt, Jawad H Petrie, Mark C McMurray, John Fosbol, Emil L Kober, Lars Schou, Morten |
author_sort | Arulmurugananthavadivel, Anojhaan |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To investigate temporal trends in inpatient vs. outpatient diagnosis of new-onset heart failure (HF) and the subsequent risk of death and hospitalization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using nationwide registers, 192 581 patients with a first diagnosis of HF (1997–2017) were included. We computed incidences of HF, age-standardized mortality rates, and absolute risks (ARs) of death and hospitalization (accounting for competing risk of death) to understand the importance of the diagnosis setting in relation to subsequent mortality and hospitalization. The overall incidence of HF was approximately the same (170/100 000 persons) every year during 1997–2017. However, in 1997, 77% of all first diagnoses of HF were made during a hospitalization, whereas the proportion was 39% in 2017. As inpatient diagnoses decreased, outpatient diagnoses increased from 23% to 61%. Outpatients had lower mortality and hospitalization rates than inpatients throughout the study period, although the 1-year age-standardized mortality rate decreased for each inpatient (24 to 14/100-person) and outpatient (11 to 7/100-person). One-year and five-year AR of death decreased by 11.1% and 17.0%, respectively, for all HF patients, while the risk of hospitalization for HF did not decrease significantly (1.13% and 0.96%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Between 1997 and 2017, HF changed from being primarily diagnosed during hospitalization to being mostly diagnosed in the outpatient setting. Outpatients had much lower mortality rates than inpatients throughout the study period. Despite a significant decrease in mortality risk for all HF patients, neither inpatients nor outpatients experienced a reduction in the risk of an HF hospitalization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9603536 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96035362022-10-31 Importance of diagnostic setting in determining mortality in patients with new-onset heart failure: temporal trends in Denmark from 1997 to 2017 Arulmurugananthavadivel, Anojhaan Holt, Anders Parveen, Saaima Lamberts, Morten Gislason, Gunnar H Torp-Pedersen, Christian Madelaire, Christian Andersson, Charlotte Zahir, Deewa Butt, Jawad H Petrie, Mark C McMurray, John Fosbol, Emil L Kober, Lars Schou, Morten Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes Original Article AIM: To investigate temporal trends in inpatient vs. outpatient diagnosis of new-onset heart failure (HF) and the subsequent risk of death and hospitalization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using nationwide registers, 192 581 patients with a first diagnosis of HF (1997–2017) were included. We computed incidences of HF, age-standardized mortality rates, and absolute risks (ARs) of death and hospitalization (accounting for competing risk of death) to understand the importance of the diagnosis setting in relation to subsequent mortality and hospitalization. The overall incidence of HF was approximately the same (170/100 000 persons) every year during 1997–2017. However, in 1997, 77% of all first diagnoses of HF were made during a hospitalization, whereas the proportion was 39% in 2017. As inpatient diagnoses decreased, outpatient diagnoses increased from 23% to 61%. Outpatients had lower mortality and hospitalization rates than inpatients throughout the study period, although the 1-year age-standardized mortality rate decreased for each inpatient (24 to 14/100-person) and outpatient (11 to 7/100-person). One-year and five-year AR of death decreased by 11.1% and 17.0%, respectively, for all HF patients, while the risk of hospitalization for HF did not decrease significantly (1.13% and 0.96%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Between 1997 and 2017, HF changed from being primarily diagnosed during hospitalization to being mostly diagnosed in the outpatient setting. Outpatients had much lower mortality rates than inpatients throughout the study period. Despite a significant decrease in mortality risk for all HF patients, neither inpatients nor outpatients experienced a reduction in the risk of an HF hospitalization. Oxford University Press 2021-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9603536/ /pubmed/34625809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab073 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Arulmurugananthavadivel, Anojhaan Holt, Anders Parveen, Saaima Lamberts, Morten Gislason, Gunnar H Torp-Pedersen, Christian Madelaire, Christian Andersson, Charlotte Zahir, Deewa Butt, Jawad H Petrie, Mark C McMurray, John Fosbol, Emil L Kober, Lars Schou, Morten Importance of diagnostic setting in determining mortality in patients with new-onset heart failure: temporal trends in Denmark from 1997 to 2017 |
title | Importance of diagnostic setting in determining mortality in patients with new-onset heart failure: temporal trends in Denmark from 1997 to 2017 |
title_full | Importance of diagnostic setting in determining mortality in patients with new-onset heart failure: temporal trends in Denmark from 1997 to 2017 |
title_fullStr | Importance of diagnostic setting in determining mortality in patients with new-onset heart failure: temporal trends in Denmark from 1997 to 2017 |
title_full_unstemmed | Importance of diagnostic setting in determining mortality in patients with new-onset heart failure: temporal trends in Denmark from 1997 to 2017 |
title_short | Importance of diagnostic setting in determining mortality in patients with new-onset heart failure: temporal trends in Denmark from 1997 to 2017 |
title_sort | importance of diagnostic setting in determining mortality in patients with new-onset heart failure: temporal trends in denmark from 1997 to 2017 |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9603536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34625809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab073 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arulmurugananthavadivelanojhaan importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017 AT holtanders importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017 AT parveensaaima importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017 AT lambertsmorten importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017 AT gislasongunnarh importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017 AT torppedersenchristian importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017 AT madelairechristian importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017 AT anderssoncharlotte importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017 AT zahirdeewa importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017 AT buttjawadh importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017 AT petriemarkc importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017 AT mcmurrayjohn importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017 AT fosbolemill importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017 AT koberlars importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017 AT schoumorten importanceofdiagnosticsettingindeterminingmortalityinpatientswithnewonsetheartfailuretemporaltrendsindenmarkfrom1997to2017 |