Cargando…

P2Y(12) Inhibitor Monotherapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

In patients with acute and chronic coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has been the cornerstone of pharmacotherapy for the past two decades. Although its antithrombotic benefit is well established, DAPT is associated with an i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Xuan, Angiolillo, Dominick J., Ortega-Paz, Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9604207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36286292
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9100340
_version_ 1784817755529150464
author Zhou, Xuan
Angiolillo, Dominick J.
Ortega-Paz, Luis
author_facet Zhou, Xuan
Angiolillo, Dominick J.
Ortega-Paz, Luis
author_sort Zhou, Xuan
collection PubMed
description In patients with acute and chronic coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has been the cornerstone of pharmacotherapy for the past two decades. Although its antithrombotic benefit is well established, DAPT is associated with an increased risk of bleeding, which is independently associated with poor prognosis. The improvement of the safety profiles of drug-eluting stents has been critical in investigating and implementing shorter DAPT regimens. The introduction into clinical practice of newer generation oral P2Y(12) inhibitors such as prasugrel and ticagrelor, which provide more potent and predictable platelet inhibition, has questioned the paradigm of standard DAPT durations after coronary stenting. Over the last five years, several trials have assessed the safety and efficacy of P2Y(12) inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of DAPT in patients treated with PCI. Moreover, ongoing studies are testing the role of P2Y(12) inhibitor monotherapy immediately after PCI in selected patients. In this review, we provide up-to-date evidence on the efficacy and safety of P2Y(12) inhibitor monotherapy after a short period of DAPT compared to DAPT in patients undergoing PCI as well as outcomes associated with P2Y(12) inhibitor monotherapy compared to aspirin for long-term prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9604207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96042072022-10-27 P2Y(12) Inhibitor Monotherapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Zhou, Xuan Angiolillo, Dominick J. Ortega-Paz, Luis J Cardiovasc Dev Dis Review In patients with acute and chronic coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has been the cornerstone of pharmacotherapy for the past two decades. Although its antithrombotic benefit is well established, DAPT is associated with an increased risk of bleeding, which is independently associated with poor prognosis. The improvement of the safety profiles of drug-eluting stents has been critical in investigating and implementing shorter DAPT regimens. The introduction into clinical practice of newer generation oral P2Y(12) inhibitors such as prasugrel and ticagrelor, which provide more potent and predictable platelet inhibition, has questioned the paradigm of standard DAPT durations after coronary stenting. Over the last five years, several trials have assessed the safety and efficacy of P2Y(12) inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of DAPT in patients treated with PCI. Moreover, ongoing studies are testing the role of P2Y(12) inhibitor monotherapy immediately after PCI in selected patients. In this review, we provide up-to-date evidence on the efficacy and safety of P2Y(12) inhibitor monotherapy after a short period of DAPT compared to DAPT in patients undergoing PCI as well as outcomes associated with P2Y(12) inhibitor monotherapy compared to aspirin for long-term prevention. MDPI 2022-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9604207/ /pubmed/36286292 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9100340 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Zhou, Xuan
Angiolillo, Dominick J.
Ortega-Paz, Luis
P2Y(12) Inhibitor Monotherapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title P2Y(12) Inhibitor Monotherapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full P2Y(12) Inhibitor Monotherapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_fullStr P2Y(12) Inhibitor Monotherapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full_unstemmed P2Y(12) Inhibitor Monotherapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_short P2Y(12) Inhibitor Monotherapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_sort p2y(12) inhibitor monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9604207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36286292
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9100340
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouxuan p2y12inhibitormonotherapyafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT angiolillodominickj p2y12inhibitormonotherapyafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT ortegapazluis p2y12inhibitormonotherapyafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention