Cargando…

Evaluation of a New, Highly Flexible Radiofrequency Coil for MR Simulation of Patients Undergoing External Beam Radiation Therapy

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of a new, highly flexible radiofrequency (RF) coil system for imaging patients undergoing MR simulation. Methods: Volumetric phantom and in vivo images were acquired with a commercially available and prototype RF coil set. Phantom evaluation was performed using a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGee, Kiaran P., Campeau, Norbert G., Witte, Robert J., Rossman, Philip J., Christopherson, Jackie A., Tryggestad, Erik J., Brinkmann, Debra H., Ma, Daniel J., Park, Sean S., Rettmann, Dan W., Robb, Fraser J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9604708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36294304
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11205984
_version_ 1784817882374340608
author McGee, Kiaran P.
Campeau, Norbert G.
Witte, Robert J.
Rossman, Philip J.
Christopherson, Jackie A.
Tryggestad, Erik J.
Brinkmann, Debra H.
Ma, Daniel J.
Park, Sean S.
Rettmann, Dan W.
Robb, Fraser J.
author_facet McGee, Kiaran P.
Campeau, Norbert G.
Witte, Robert J.
Rossman, Philip J.
Christopherson, Jackie A.
Tryggestad, Erik J.
Brinkmann, Debra H.
Ma, Daniel J.
Park, Sean S.
Rettmann, Dan W.
Robb, Fraser J.
author_sort McGee, Kiaran P.
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To evaluate the performance of a new, highly flexible radiofrequency (RF) coil system for imaging patients undergoing MR simulation. Methods: Volumetric phantom and in vivo images were acquired with a commercially available and prototype RF coil set. Phantom evaluation was performed using a silicone-filled humanoid phantom of the head and shoulders. In vivo assessment was performed in five healthy and six patient subjects. Phantom data included T(1)-weighted volumetric imaging, while in vivo acquisitions included both T(1)- and T(2)-weighted volumetric imaging. Signal to noise ratio (SNR) and uniformity metrics were calculated in the phantom data, while SNR values were calculated in vivo. Statistical significance was tested by means of a non-parametric analysis of variance test. Results: At a threshold of p = 0.05, differences in measured SNR distributions within the entire phantom volume were statistically different in two of the three paired coil set comparisons. Differences in per slice average SNR between the two coil sets were all statistically significant, as well as differences in per slice image uniformity. For patients, SNRs within the entire imaging volume were statistically significantly different in four of the nine comparisons and seven of the nine comparisons performed on the per slice average SNR values. For healthy subjects, SNRs within the entire imaging volume were statistically significantly different in seven of the nine comparisons and eight of the nine comparisons when per slice average SNR was tested. Conclusions: Phantom and in vivo results demonstrate that image quality obtained from the novel flexible RF coil set was similar or improved over the conventional coil system. The results also demonstrate that image quality is impacted by the specific coil configurations used for imaging and should be matched appropriately to the anatomic site imaged to ensure optimal and reproducible image quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9604708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96047082022-10-27 Evaluation of a New, Highly Flexible Radiofrequency Coil for MR Simulation of Patients Undergoing External Beam Radiation Therapy McGee, Kiaran P. Campeau, Norbert G. Witte, Robert J. Rossman, Philip J. Christopherson, Jackie A. Tryggestad, Erik J. Brinkmann, Debra H. Ma, Daniel J. Park, Sean S. Rettmann, Dan W. Robb, Fraser J. J Clin Med Article Purpose: To evaluate the performance of a new, highly flexible radiofrequency (RF) coil system for imaging patients undergoing MR simulation. Methods: Volumetric phantom and in vivo images were acquired with a commercially available and prototype RF coil set. Phantom evaluation was performed using a silicone-filled humanoid phantom of the head and shoulders. In vivo assessment was performed in five healthy and six patient subjects. Phantom data included T(1)-weighted volumetric imaging, while in vivo acquisitions included both T(1)- and T(2)-weighted volumetric imaging. Signal to noise ratio (SNR) and uniformity metrics were calculated in the phantom data, while SNR values were calculated in vivo. Statistical significance was tested by means of a non-parametric analysis of variance test. Results: At a threshold of p = 0.05, differences in measured SNR distributions within the entire phantom volume were statistically different in two of the three paired coil set comparisons. Differences in per slice average SNR between the two coil sets were all statistically significant, as well as differences in per slice image uniformity. For patients, SNRs within the entire imaging volume were statistically significantly different in four of the nine comparisons and seven of the nine comparisons performed on the per slice average SNR values. For healthy subjects, SNRs within the entire imaging volume were statistically significantly different in seven of the nine comparisons and eight of the nine comparisons when per slice average SNR was tested. Conclusions: Phantom and in vivo results demonstrate that image quality obtained from the novel flexible RF coil set was similar or improved over the conventional coil system. The results also demonstrate that image quality is impacted by the specific coil configurations used for imaging and should be matched appropriately to the anatomic site imaged to ensure optimal and reproducible image quality. MDPI 2022-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9604708/ /pubmed/36294304 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11205984 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
McGee, Kiaran P.
Campeau, Norbert G.
Witte, Robert J.
Rossman, Philip J.
Christopherson, Jackie A.
Tryggestad, Erik J.
Brinkmann, Debra H.
Ma, Daniel J.
Park, Sean S.
Rettmann, Dan W.
Robb, Fraser J.
Evaluation of a New, Highly Flexible Radiofrequency Coil for MR Simulation of Patients Undergoing External Beam Radiation Therapy
title Evaluation of a New, Highly Flexible Radiofrequency Coil for MR Simulation of Patients Undergoing External Beam Radiation Therapy
title_full Evaluation of a New, Highly Flexible Radiofrequency Coil for MR Simulation of Patients Undergoing External Beam Radiation Therapy
title_fullStr Evaluation of a New, Highly Flexible Radiofrequency Coil for MR Simulation of Patients Undergoing External Beam Radiation Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a New, Highly Flexible Radiofrequency Coil for MR Simulation of Patients Undergoing External Beam Radiation Therapy
title_short Evaluation of a New, Highly Flexible Radiofrequency Coil for MR Simulation of Patients Undergoing External Beam Radiation Therapy
title_sort evaluation of a new, highly flexible radiofrequency coil for mr simulation of patients undergoing external beam radiation therapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9604708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36294304
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11205984
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgeekiaranp evaluationofanewhighlyflexibleradiofrequencycoilformrsimulationofpatientsundergoingexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT campeaunorbertg evaluationofanewhighlyflexibleradiofrequencycoilformrsimulationofpatientsundergoingexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT witterobertj evaluationofanewhighlyflexibleradiofrequencycoilformrsimulationofpatientsundergoingexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT rossmanphilipj evaluationofanewhighlyflexibleradiofrequencycoilformrsimulationofpatientsundergoingexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT christophersonjackiea evaluationofanewhighlyflexibleradiofrequencycoilformrsimulationofpatientsundergoingexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT tryggestaderikj evaluationofanewhighlyflexibleradiofrequencycoilformrsimulationofpatientsundergoingexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT brinkmanndebrah evaluationofanewhighlyflexibleradiofrequencycoilformrsimulationofpatientsundergoingexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT madanielj evaluationofanewhighlyflexibleradiofrequencycoilformrsimulationofpatientsundergoingexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT parkseans evaluationofanewhighlyflexibleradiofrequencycoilformrsimulationofpatientsundergoingexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT rettmanndanw evaluationofanewhighlyflexibleradiofrequencycoilformrsimulationofpatientsundergoingexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT robbfraserj evaluationofanewhighlyflexibleradiofrequencycoilformrsimulationofpatientsundergoingexternalbeamradiationtherapy