Cargando…

Lip Bumper Therapy Does Not Influence the Sagittal Mandibular Incisor Position in a Retrospective CBCT Study

Lip bumper (LB) therapy is used as a treatment approach for mild to moderate crowding without extraction of teeth. Previous studies demonstrated that LB increases arch length through molar uprighting and lateral expansion. However, the effects of LB on mandibular incisors are inconclusive. The contr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griswold, Olivia, Li, Chenshuang, Orr, Justin C., Boucher, Normand S., Shah, Shalin R., Chung, Chun-Hsi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9604935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36294352
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206032
_version_ 1784817940247347200
author Griswold, Olivia
Li, Chenshuang
Orr, Justin C.
Boucher, Normand S.
Shah, Shalin R.
Chung, Chun-Hsi
author_facet Griswold, Olivia
Li, Chenshuang
Orr, Justin C.
Boucher, Normand S.
Shah, Shalin R.
Chung, Chun-Hsi
author_sort Griswold, Olivia
collection PubMed
description Lip bumper (LB) therapy is used as a treatment approach for mild to moderate crowding without extraction of teeth. Previous studies demonstrated that LB increases arch length through molar uprighting and lateral expansion. However, the effects of LB on mandibular incisors are inconclusive. The controversial results from different studies may be due to limitations including absence of a control group and/or use of 2D radiography. To address this issue, the current retrospective longitudinal CBCT study compared a rapid maxillary expansion (RME) group with no lower treatment [16 patients (9 females, 7 males); median age 8.86 years at T1 and 11.82 years at T2] and an RME + LB group [18 patients (13 females, 5 males); median age 9.46 years at T1 and 12.10 years at T2]. The CBCTs taken before and after phase 1 treatment were 3D superimposed based on the mandibular structure and were measured to determine the angular and linear changes of the mandibular incisors over the course of LB treatment. For comparisons between different timepoints within a group, a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was used. For intergroup comparisons, a Mann–Whitney U test was used. Both groups showed eruption and protrusion of the mandibular incisors during the observation period, while there was no significant change in proclination of the lower incisors. When comparing the discrepancy of change between groups, there was no statistically significant difference detected. In summary, by utilizing a longitudinal 3D database, the current study demonstrated that the effect of LB on the position of the mandibular incisors is limited.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9604935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96049352022-10-27 Lip Bumper Therapy Does Not Influence the Sagittal Mandibular Incisor Position in a Retrospective CBCT Study Griswold, Olivia Li, Chenshuang Orr, Justin C. Boucher, Normand S. Shah, Shalin R. Chung, Chun-Hsi J Clin Med Article Lip bumper (LB) therapy is used as a treatment approach for mild to moderate crowding without extraction of teeth. Previous studies demonstrated that LB increases arch length through molar uprighting and lateral expansion. However, the effects of LB on mandibular incisors are inconclusive. The controversial results from different studies may be due to limitations including absence of a control group and/or use of 2D radiography. To address this issue, the current retrospective longitudinal CBCT study compared a rapid maxillary expansion (RME) group with no lower treatment [16 patients (9 females, 7 males); median age 8.86 years at T1 and 11.82 years at T2] and an RME + LB group [18 patients (13 females, 5 males); median age 9.46 years at T1 and 12.10 years at T2]. The CBCTs taken before and after phase 1 treatment were 3D superimposed based on the mandibular structure and were measured to determine the angular and linear changes of the mandibular incisors over the course of LB treatment. For comparisons between different timepoints within a group, a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was used. For intergroup comparisons, a Mann–Whitney U test was used. Both groups showed eruption and protrusion of the mandibular incisors during the observation period, while there was no significant change in proclination of the lower incisors. When comparing the discrepancy of change between groups, there was no statistically significant difference detected. In summary, by utilizing a longitudinal 3D database, the current study demonstrated that the effect of LB on the position of the mandibular incisors is limited. MDPI 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9604935/ /pubmed/36294352 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206032 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Griswold, Olivia
Li, Chenshuang
Orr, Justin C.
Boucher, Normand S.
Shah, Shalin R.
Chung, Chun-Hsi
Lip Bumper Therapy Does Not Influence the Sagittal Mandibular Incisor Position in a Retrospective CBCT Study
title Lip Bumper Therapy Does Not Influence the Sagittal Mandibular Incisor Position in a Retrospective CBCT Study
title_full Lip Bumper Therapy Does Not Influence the Sagittal Mandibular Incisor Position in a Retrospective CBCT Study
title_fullStr Lip Bumper Therapy Does Not Influence the Sagittal Mandibular Incisor Position in a Retrospective CBCT Study
title_full_unstemmed Lip Bumper Therapy Does Not Influence the Sagittal Mandibular Incisor Position in a Retrospective CBCT Study
title_short Lip Bumper Therapy Does Not Influence the Sagittal Mandibular Incisor Position in a Retrospective CBCT Study
title_sort lip bumper therapy does not influence the sagittal mandibular incisor position in a retrospective cbct study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9604935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36294352
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206032
work_keys_str_mv AT griswoldolivia lipbumpertherapydoesnotinfluencethesagittalmandibularincisorpositioninaretrospectivecbctstudy
AT lichenshuang lipbumpertherapydoesnotinfluencethesagittalmandibularincisorpositioninaretrospectivecbctstudy
AT orrjustinc lipbumpertherapydoesnotinfluencethesagittalmandibularincisorpositioninaretrospectivecbctstudy
AT bouchernormands lipbumpertherapydoesnotinfluencethesagittalmandibularincisorpositioninaretrospectivecbctstudy
AT shahshalinr lipbumpertherapydoesnotinfluencethesagittalmandibularincisorpositioninaretrospectivecbctstudy
AT chungchunhsi lipbumpertherapydoesnotinfluencethesagittalmandibularincisorpositioninaretrospectivecbctstudy