Cargando…

Comparison of 0.12% Chlorhexidine and a New Bone Bioactive Liquid, BBL, in Mouthwash for Oral Wound Healing: A Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Human Trial

Following surgery, healing within the oral cavity occurs in a hostile environment, and proper oral care and hygiene are required to accelerate recovery. The aim of the current study is to investigate and compare the bioreactivity characteristics of mouthwashes based on either chlorhexidine (CHX) or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrés-Amat, Eduard, Al Madhoun, Ashraf, Ferrés-Amat, Elvira, Carrió, Neus, Barajas, Miguel, Al-Madhoun, Areej Said, Ferrés-Padró, Eduard, Marti, Carles, Atari, Maher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9605239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36294864
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12101725
_version_ 1784818016739917824
author Ferrés-Amat, Eduard
Al Madhoun, Ashraf
Ferrés-Amat, Elvira
Carrió, Neus
Barajas, Miguel
Al-Madhoun, Areej Said
Ferrés-Padró, Eduard
Marti, Carles
Atari, Maher
author_facet Ferrés-Amat, Eduard
Al Madhoun, Ashraf
Ferrés-Amat, Elvira
Carrió, Neus
Barajas, Miguel
Al-Madhoun, Areej Said
Ferrés-Padró, Eduard
Marti, Carles
Atari, Maher
author_sort Ferrés-Amat, Eduard
collection PubMed
description Following surgery, healing within the oral cavity occurs in a hostile environment, and proper oral care and hygiene are required to accelerate recovery. The aim of the current study is to investigate and compare the bioreactivity characteristics of mouthwashes based on either chlorhexidine (CHX) or a novel bone bioactive liquid (BBL) in terms of oral healing within seven days application post-surgery. A randomized, double blind clinical trial was conducted in 81 patients, wherein the mouthwashes were applied twice a day for a period of 7 days. The visual analog scale (VAS) protocol was applied to determine pain index scores. Early wound healing index (EHI) score was determined for evaluating oral cavity healing progress. No adverse effects were observed using the mouthwashes, but CHX application resulted in stained teeth. Applications of both CHX and BBL were sufficient to reduce pain over a period of 7 days. However, the BBL group demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in VAS scores starting on day 4. The EHI scores were significantly higher in the BBL group compared with the CHX group, independent of tooth location. No differences in either VAS or EHI scores due to gender were observed. Compared with the commercially available CHX mouthwash, application of the BBL mouthwash reduced pain and accelerated oral cavity healing to a greater extent, suggesting it effectively improves the oral cavity microenvironment at the wound site in mediating soft tissue regeneration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9605239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96052392022-10-27 Comparison of 0.12% Chlorhexidine and a New Bone Bioactive Liquid, BBL, in Mouthwash for Oral Wound Healing: A Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Human Trial Ferrés-Amat, Eduard Al Madhoun, Ashraf Ferrés-Amat, Elvira Carrió, Neus Barajas, Miguel Al-Madhoun, Areej Said Ferrés-Padró, Eduard Marti, Carles Atari, Maher J Pers Med Brief Report Following surgery, healing within the oral cavity occurs in a hostile environment, and proper oral care and hygiene are required to accelerate recovery. The aim of the current study is to investigate and compare the bioreactivity characteristics of mouthwashes based on either chlorhexidine (CHX) or a novel bone bioactive liquid (BBL) in terms of oral healing within seven days application post-surgery. A randomized, double blind clinical trial was conducted in 81 patients, wherein the mouthwashes were applied twice a day for a period of 7 days. The visual analog scale (VAS) protocol was applied to determine pain index scores. Early wound healing index (EHI) score was determined for evaluating oral cavity healing progress. No adverse effects were observed using the mouthwashes, but CHX application resulted in stained teeth. Applications of both CHX and BBL were sufficient to reduce pain over a period of 7 days. However, the BBL group demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in VAS scores starting on day 4. The EHI scores were significantly higher in the BBL group compared with the CHX group, independent of tooth location. No differences in either VAS or EHI scores due to gender were observed. Compared with the commercially available CHX mouthwash, application of the BBL mouthwash reduced pain and accelerated oral cavity healing to a greater extent, suggesting it effectively improves the oral cavity microenvironment at the wound site in mediating soft tissue regeneration. MDPI 2022-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9605239/ /pubmed/36294864 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12101725 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Ferrés-Amat, Eduard
Al Madhoun, Ashraf
Ferrés-Amat, Elvira
Carrió, Neus
Barajas, Miguel
Al-Madhoun, Areej Said
Ferrés-Padró, Eduard
Marti, Carles
Atari, Maher
Comparison of 0.12% Chlorhexidine and a New Bone Bioactive Liquid, BBL, in Mouthwash for Oral Wound Healing: A Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Human Trial
title Comparison of 0.12% Chlorhexidine and a New Bone Bioactive Liquid, BBL, in Mouthwash for Oral Wound Healing: A Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Human Trial
title_full Comparison of 0.12% Chlorhexidine and a New Bone Bioactive Liquid, BBL, in Mouthwash for Oral Wound Healing: A Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Human Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of 0.12% Chlorhexidine and a New Bone Bioactive Liquid, BBL, in Mouthwash for Oral Wound Healing: A Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Human Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 0.12% Chlorhexidine and a New Bone Bioactive Liquid, BBL, in Mouthwash for Oral Wound Healing: A Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Human Trial
title_short Comparison of 0.12% Chlorhexidine and a New Bone Bioactive Liquid, BBL, in Mouthwash for Oral Wound Healing: A Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Human Trial
title_sort comparison of 0.12% chlorhexidine and a new bone bioactive liquid, bbl, in mouthwash for oral wound healing: a randomized, double blind clinical human trial
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9605239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36294864
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12101725
work_keys_str_mv AT ferresamateduard comparisonof012chlorhexidineandanewbonebioactiveliquidbblinmouthwashfororalwoundhealingarandomizeddoubleblindclinicalhumantrial
AT almadhounashraf comparisonof012chlorhexidineandanewbonebioactiveliquidbblinmouthwashfororalwoundhealingarandomizeddoubleblindclinicalhumantrial
AT ferresamatelvira comparisonof012chlorhexidineandanewbonebioactiveliquidbblinmouthwashfororalwoundhealingarandomizeddoubleblindclinicalhumantrial
AT carrioneus comparisonof012chlorhexidineandanewbonebioactiveliquidbblinmouthwashfororalwoundhealingarandomizeddoubleblindclinicalhumantrial
AT barajasmiguel comparisonof012chlorhexidineandanewbonebioactiveliquidbblinmouthwashfororalwoundhealingarandomizeddoubleblindclinicalhumantrial
AT almadhounareejsaid comparisonof012chlorhexidineandanewbonebioactiveliquidbblinmouthwashfororalwoundhealingarandomizeddoubleblindclinicalhumantrial
AT ferrespadroeduard comparisonof012chlorhexidineandanewbonebioactiveliquidbblinmouthwashfororalwoundhealingarandomizeddoubleblindclinicalhumantrial
AT marticarles comparisonof012chlorhexidineandanewbonebioactiveliquidbblinmouthwashfororalwoundhealingarandomizeddoubleblindclinicalhumantrial
AT atarimaher comparisonof012chlorhexidineandanewbonebioactiveliquidbblinmouthwashfororalwoundhealingarandomizeddoubleblindclinicalhumantrial