Cargando…
Summary: 2021 International Consultation on Incontinence Evidence-Based Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
(1) Background: There is wide variation in the reported prevalence rates for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). There is also wide variation in the rate at which surgical interventions for pelvic organ prolapse are performed, as well as the type of interventions undertaken. As part of the International Co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9605527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36294427 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206106 |
_version_ | 1784818089265725440 |
---|---|
author | de Tayrac, Renaud Antosh, Danielle D. Baessler, Kaven Cheon, Cecilia Deffieux, Xavier Gutman, Robert Lee, Joseph Nager, Charles Schizas, Alexis Sung, Vivian Maher, Christopher |
author_facet | de Tayrac, Renaud Antosh, Danielle D. Baessler, Kaven Cheon, Cecilia Deffieux, Xavier Gutman, Robert Lee, Joseph Nager, Charles Schizas, Alexis Sung, Vivian Maher, Christopher |
author_sort | de Tayrac, Renaud |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: There is wide variation in the reported prevalence rates for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). There is also wide variation in the rate at which surgical interventions for pelvic organ prolapse are performed, as well as the type of interventions undertaken. As part of the International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI), our committee was tasked to produce evidence-based pathways for the surgical management of POP, any associated stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and bowel dysfunction. (2) Methods: To enable us to generate such evidence, we undertook a thorough search for the POP surgery-related, English-language scientific literature published up to April 2021. (3) Results: The committee evaluated the literature and made recommendations based on the Oxford grading system. (4) Conclusions: This review serves to provide a summary of the 2021 ICI surgical management of an evidence-based prolapse pathway and outline the evidence used to inform this guidance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9605527 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96055272022-10-27 Summary: 2021 International Consultation on Incontinence Evidence-Based Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse de Tayrac, Renaud Antosh, Danielle D. Baessler, Kaven Cheon, Cecilia Deffieux, Xavier Gutman, Robert Lee, Joseph Nager, Charles Schizas, Alexis Sung, Vivian Maher, Christopher J Clin Med Review (1) Background: There is wide variation in the reported prevalence rates for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). There is also wide variation in the rate at which surgical interventions for pelvic organ prolapse are performed, as well as the type of interventions undertaken. As part of the International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI), our committee was tasked to produce evidence-based pathways for the surgical management of POP, any associated stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and bowel dysfunction. (2) Methods: To enable us to generate such evidence, we undertook a thorough search for the POP surgery-related, English-language scientific literature published up to April 2021. (3) Results: The committee evaluated the literature and made recommendations based on the Oxford grading system. (4) Conclusions: This review serves to provide a summary of the 2021 ICI surgical management of an evidence-based prolapse pathway and outline the evidence used to inform this guidance. MDPI 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9605527/ /pubmed/36294427 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206106 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review de Tayrac, Renaud Antosh, Danielle D. Baessler, Kaven Cheon, Cecilia Deffieux, Xavier Gutman, Robert Lee, Joseph Nager, Charles Schizas, Alexis Sung, Vivian Maher, Christopher Summary: 2021 International Consultation on Incontinence Evidence-Based Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
title | Summary: 2021 International Consultation on Incontinence Evidence-Based Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
title_full | Summary: 2021 International Consultation on Incontinence Evidence-Based Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
title_fullStr | Summary: 2021 International Consultation on Incontinence Evidence-Based Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
title_full_unstemmed | Summary: 2021 International Consultation on Incontinence Evidence-Based Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
title_short | Summary: 2021 International Consultation on Incontinence Evidence-Based Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
title_sort | summary: 2021 international consultation on incontinence evidence-based surgical pathway for pelvic organ prolapse |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9605527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36294427 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206106 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT detayracrenaud summary2021internationalconsultationonincontinenceevidencebasedsurgicalpathwayforpelvicorganprolapse AT antoshdanielled summary2021internationalconsultationonincontinenceevidencebasedsurgicalpathwayforpelvicorganprolapse AT baesslerkaven summary2021internationalconsultationonincontinenceevidencebasedsurgicalpathwayforpelvicorganprolapse AT cheoncecilia summary2021internationalconsultationonincontinenceevidencebasedsurgicalpathwayforpelvicorganprolapse AT deffieuxxavier summary2021internationalconsultationonincontinenceevidencebasedsurgicalpathwayforpelvicorganprolapse AT gutmanrobert summary2021internationalconsultationonincontinenceevidencebasedsurgicalpathwayforpelvicorganprolapse AT leejoseph summary2021internationalconsultationonincontinenceevidencebasedsurgicalpathwayforpelvicorganprolapse AT nagercharles summary2021internationalconsultationonincontinenceevidencebasedsurgicalpathwayforpelvicorganprolapse AT schizasalexis summary2021internationalconsultationonincontinenceevidencebasedsurgicalpathwayforpelvicorganprolapse AT sungvivian summary2021internationalconsultationonincontinenceevidencebasedsurgicalpathwayforpelvicorganprolapse AT maherchristopher summary2021internationalconsultationonincontinenceevidencebasedsurgicalpathwayforpelvicorganprolapse |