Cargando…
Optimal settings and advantages of drones as a tool for canopy arthropod collection
The growing field of aeroecology is limited by difficulties associated with sampling in the air column. Aerial insects are particularly hard to sample, despite being the main prey in the air column, with some recent studies attempting to use drones as a collection method. We conducted a study to det...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9606009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36289247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22446-z |
_version_ | 1784818203833139200 |
---|---|
author | Madden, Jamie C. Brisson-Curadeau, Émile Gillung, Jessica P. Bird, David M. Elliott, Kyle H. |
author_facet | Madden, Jamie C. Brisson-Curadeau, Émile Gillung, Jessica P. Bird, David M. Elliott, Kyle H. |
author_sort | Madden, Jamie C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The growing field of aeroecology is limited by difficulties associated with sampling in the air column. Aerial insects are particularly hard to sample, despite being the main prey in the air column, with some recent studies attempting to use drones as a collection method. We conducted a study to determine the optimal drone settings for collecting insects above the canopy, where drones are seldom used. By attaching a net to the body of a small, commercial drone, we tested yield from different height, speed, and net settings in wetlands, as well as compared insect diversity across different habitat canopies. Height was the most important setting; grazing the canopy yielded significantly more insects than flying one meter above it. Speed, drone type, and net size did not influence the number of insects caught per trial. Wetland canopies had higher abundance, diversity, and species richness in its arthropod populations compared to forest canopies or lakes. Compared to the yield of Lindgren funnels—a traditional sampling method in entomology—drones captured higher diversity and abundance of insects in a fraction of the time. This study confirms that drones are an efficient and accurate way to collect canopy arthropods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9606009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96060092022-10-28 Optimal settings and advantages of drones as a tool for canopy arthropod collection Madden, Jamie C. Brisson-Curadeau, Émile Gillung, Jessica P. Bird, David M. Elliott, Kyle H. Sci Rep Article The growing field of aeroecology is limited by difficulties associated with sampling in the air column. Aerial insects are particularly hard to sample, despite being the main prey in the air column, with some recent studies attempting to use drones as a collection method. We conducted a study to determine the optimal drone settings for collecting insects above the canopy, where drones are seldom used. By attaching a net to the body of a small, commercial drone, we tested yield from different height, speed, and net settings in wetlands, as well as compared insect diversity across different habitat canopies. Height was the most important setting; grazing the canopy yielded significantly more insects than flying one meter above it. Speed, drone type, and net size did not influence the number of insects caught per trial. Wetland canopies had higher abundance, diversity, and species richness in its arthropod populations compared to forest canopies or lakes. Compared to the yield of Lindgren funnels—a traditional sampling method in entomology—drones captured higher diversity and abundance of insects in a fraction of the time. This study confirms that drones are an efficient and accurate way to collect canopy arthropods. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9606009/ /pubmed/36289247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22446-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Madden, Jamie C. Brisson-Curadeau, Émile Gillung, Jessica P. Bird, David M. Elliott, Kyle H. Optimal settings and advantages of drones as a tool for canopy arthropod collection |
title | Optimal settings and advantages of drones as a tool for canopy arthropod collection |
title_full | Optimal settings and advantages of drones as a tool for canopy arthropod collection |
title_fullStr | Optimal settings and advantages of drones as a tool for canopy arthropod collection |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal settings and advantages of drones as a tool for canopy arthropod collection |
title_short | Optimal settings and advantages of drones as a tool for canopy arthropod collection |
title_sort | optimal settings and advantages of drones as a tool for canopy arthropod collection |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9606009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36289247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22446-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maddenjamiec optimalsettingsandadvantagesofdronesasatoolforcanopyarthropodcollection AT brissoncuradeauemile optimalsettingsandadvantagesofdronesasatoolforcanopyarthropodcollection AT gillungjessicap optimalsettingsandadvantagesofdronesasatoolforcanopyarthropodcollection AT birddavidm optimalsettingsandadvantagesofdronesasatoolforcanopyarthropodcollection AT elliottkyleh optimalsettingsandadvantagesofdronesasatoolforcanopyarthropodcollection |