Cargando…

Tailoring the sampling time of single-sample GFR measurement according to expected renal function: a multisite audit

BACKGROUND: The 2018 BNMS Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) guidelines recommend a single-sample technique with the sampling time dictated by the expected renal function, but this is not known with any accuracy before the test. We aimed to assess whether the sampling regime suggested in the guideline...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McMeekin, Helena, Townrow, Sam, Barnfield, Mark, Bradley, Andy, Fongenie, Ben, McGowan, Daniel R., Memmott, Matthew, Porter, Charlotte A., Wickham, Fred, Vennart, Nick, Burniston, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9606161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36289135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00500-z
_version_ 1784818235813658624
author McMeekin, Helena
Townrow, Sam
Barnfield, Mark
Bradley, Andy
Fongenie, Ben
McGowan, Daniel R.
Memmott, Matthew
Porter, Charlotte A.
Wickham, Fred
Vennart, Nick
Burniston, Maria
author_facet McMeekin, Helena
Townrow, Sam
Barnfield, Mark
Bradley, Andy
Fongenie, Ben
McGowan, Daniel R.
Memmott, Matthew
Porter, Charlotte A.
Wickham, Fred
Vennart, Nick
Burniston, Maria
author_sort McMeekin, Helena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The 2018 BNMS Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) guidelines recommend a single-sample technique with the sampling time dictated by the expected renal function, but this is not known with any accuracy before the test. We aimed to assess whether the sampling regime suggested in the guidelines is optimal and determine the error in GFR result if the sample time is chosen incorrectly. We can then infer the degree of flexibility in the sampling regime. METHODS: Data from 6328 patients referred for GFR assessment at 6 different hospitals for a variety of indications were reviewed. The difference between the single-sample (Fleming) GFR result at each sample time and the slope–intercept GFR result at each hospital was calculated. A second dataset of 777 studies from one hospital with nine samples collected from 5 min to 8 h post-injection was analysed to provide a reference GFR to which the single-sample results were compared. RESULTS: Recommended single-sample times have been revised: for an expected GFR above 90 ml/min/1.73m(2) a 2-h sample is recommended; between 50 and 90 ml/min/1.73m(2) a 3-h sample is recommended; and between 30 and 50 ml/min/1.73m(2) a 4-h sample is recommended. Root mean square error in single-sample GFR result compared with slope–intercept can be kept less than or equal to 3.30 ml/min/1.73m(2) by following these recommendations. CONCLUSION: The results of this multisite study demonstrate a reassuringly wide range of sample times for an acceptably accurate single-sample GFR result. Modified recommended single-sample times have been proposed in line with the results, and a lookup table has been produced of rms errors across the full range of GFR results for the three sample times which can be used for error reporting of a mistimed sample.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9606161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96061612022-10-28 Tailoring the sampling time of single-sample GFR measurement according to expected renal function: a multisite audit McMeekin, Helena Townrow, Sam Barnfield, Mark Bradley, Andy Fongenie, Ben McGowan, Daniel R. Memmott, Matthew Porter, Charlotte A. Wickham, Fred Vennart, Nick Burniston, Maria EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: The 2018 BNMS Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) guidelines recommend a single-sample technique with the sampling time dictated by the expected renal function, but this is not known with any accuracy before the test. We aimed to assess whether the sampling regime suggested in the guidelines is optimal and determine the error in GFR result if the sample time is chosen incorrectly. We can then infer the degree of flexibility in the sampling regime. METHODS: Data from 6328 patients referred for GFR assessment at 6 different hospitals for a variety of indications were reviewed. The difference between the single-sample (Fleming) GFR result at each sample time and the slope–intercept GFR result at each hospital was calculated. A second dataset of 777 studies from one hospital with nine samples collected from 5 min to 8 h post-injection was analysed to provide a reference GFR to which the single-sample results were compared. RESULTS: Recommended single-sample times have been revised: for an expected GFR above 90 ml/min/1.73m(2) a 2-h sample is recommended; between 50 and 90 ml/min/1.73m(2) a 3-h sample is recommended; and between 30 and 50 ml/min/1.73m(2) a 4-h sample is recommended. Root mean square error in single-sample GFR result compared with slope–intercept can be kept less than or equal to 3.30 ml/min/1.73m(2) by following these recommendations. CONCLUSION: The results of this multisite study demonstrate a reassuringly wide range of sample times for an acceptably accurate single-sample GFR result. Modified recommended single-sample times have been proposed in line with the results, and a lookup table has been produced of rms errors across the full range of GFR results for the three sample times which can be used for error reporting of a mistimed sample. Springer International Publishing 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9606161/ /pubmed/36289135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00500-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
McMeekin, Helena
Townrow, Sam
Barnfield, Mark
Bradley, Andy
Fongenie, Ben
McGowan, Daniel R.
Memmott, Matthew
Porter, Charlotte A.
Wickham, Fred
Vennart, Nick
Burniston, Maria
Tailoring the sampling time of single-sample GFR measurement according to expected renal function: a multisite audit
title Tailoring the sampling time of single-sample GFR measurement according to expected renal function: a multisite audit
title_full Tailoring the sampling time of single-sample GFR measurement according to expected renal function: a multisite audit
title_fullStr Tailoring the sampling time of single-sample GFR measurement according to expected renal function: a multisite audit
title_full_unstemmed Tailoring the sampling time of single-sample GFR measurement according to expected renal function: a multisite audit
title_short Tailoring the sampling time of single-sample GFR measurement according to expected renal function: a multisite audit
title_sort tailoring the sampling time of single-sample gfr measurement according to expected renal function: a multisite audit
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9606161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36289135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00500-z
work_keys_str_mv AT mcmeekinhelena tailoringthesamplingtimeofsinglesamplegfrmeasurementaccordingtoexpectedrenalfunctionamultisiteaudit
AT townrowsam tailoringthesamplingtimeofsinglesamplegfrmeasurementaccordingtoexpectedrenalfunctionamultisiteaudit
AT barnfieldmark tailoringthesamplingtimeofsinglesamplegfrmeasurementaccordingtoexpectedrenalfunctionamultisiteaudit
AT bradleyandy tailoringthesamplingtimeofsinglesamplegfrmeasurementaccordingtoexpectedrenalfunctionamultisiteaudit
AT fongenieben tailoringthesamplingtimeofsinglesamplegfrmeasurementaccordingtoexpectedrenalfunctionamultisiteaudit
AT mcgowandanielr tailoringthesamplingtimeofsinglesamplegfrmeasurementaccordingtoexpectedrenalfunctionamultisiteaudit
AT memmottmatthew tailoringthesamplingtimeofsinglesamplegfrmeasurementaccordingtoexpectedrenalfunctionamultisiteaudit
AT portercharlottea tailoringthesamplingtimeofsinglesamplegfrmeasurementaccordingtoexpectedrenalfunctionamultisiteaudit
AT wickhamfred tailoringthesamplingtimeofsinglesamplegfrmeasurementaccordingtoexpectedrenalfunctionamultisiteaudit
AT vennartnick tailoringthesamplingtimeofsinglesamplegfrmeasurementaccordingtoexpectedrenalfunctionamultisiteaudit
AT burnistonmaria tailoringthesamplingtimeofsinglesamplegfrmeasurementaccordingtoexpectedrenalfunctionamultisiteaudit