Cargando…
Dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery for meningiomas: A retrospective study in a single center
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to study the efficiency and safety of a dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery strategy for large meningiomas or meningiomas close to important nerve structures. METHODS: This study evaluates the outcome of a prospectively accrued series of 71 consecutive patients with meni...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9606413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36313491 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.893480 |
_version_ | 1784818292893941760 |
---|---|
author | Gong, Xiu Ding, Jianbo Knisely, Jonathan P. S. Wang, Enmin Pan, Li Wang, Binjiang Zhang, Nan Wu, Hanfeng Dai, Jiazhong Yu, Tonggang Tang, Xuqun |
author_facet | Gong, Xiu Ding, Jianbo Knisely, Jonathan P. S. Wang, Enmin Pan, Li Wang, Binjiang Zhang, Nan Wu, Hanfeng Dai, Jiazhong Yu, Tonggang Tang, Xuqun |
author_sort | Gong, Xiu |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to study the efficiency and safety of a dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery strategy for large meningiomas or meningiomas close to important nerve structures. METHODS: This study evaluates the outcome of a prospectively accrued series of 71 consecutive patients with meningiomas treated with staged dose-fractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery. The average peripheral doses for the first and second fractions were 9.0 ± 0.9 Gy (8–12 Gy) and 8.6 ± 0.7 Gy (range, 7–10 Gy), respectively. The interval between fractions was 6.1 ± 1.9 months (range, 3–12 months). The median follow-up time was 36 months (12–96 months). RESULTS: During the follow-up period after the second fraction, 97.2% achieved tumor control in our series. A total of 2 patients exhibited local recurrence at 30 and 60 months after the second fraction, respectively. No treatment-related complications or new long-term neurological dysfunctions were reported. MRIs observed slightly or moderately increased peritumoral edema in six patients, but no specific neurological complaints are attributed to this finding. CONCLUSION: This study investigates the efficiency and safety of dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery as an alternative option for meningiomas that were large in volume, adjacent to crucial structures, or in patients with contraindications to craniotomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9606413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96064132022-10-28 Dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery for meningiomas: A retrospective study in a single center Gong, Xiu Ding, Jianbo Knisely, Jonathan P. S. Wang, Enmin Pan, Li Wang, Binjiang Zhang, Nan Wu, Hanfeng Dai, Jiazhong Yu, Tonggang Tang, Xuqun Front Neurol Neurology OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to study the efficiency and safety of a dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery strategy for large meningiomas or meningiomas close to important nerve structures. METHODS: This study evaluates the outcome of a prospectively accrued series of 71 consecutive patients with meningiomas treated with staged dose-fractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery. The average peripheral doses for the first and second fractions were 9.0 ± 0.9 Gy (8–12 Gy) and 8.6 ± 0.7 Gy (range, 7–10 Gy), respectively. The interval between fractions was 6.1 ± 1.9 months (range, 3–12 months). The median follow-up time was 36 months (12–96 months). RESULTS: During the follow-up period after the second fraction, 97.2% achieved tumor control in our series. A total of 2 patients exhibited local recurrence at 30 and 60 months after the second fraction, respectively. No treatment-related complications or new long-term neurological dysfunctions were reported. MRIs observed slightly or moderately increased peritumoral edema in six patients, but no specific neurological complaints are attributed to this finding. CONCLUSION: This study investigates the efficiency and safety of dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery as an alternative option for meningiomas that were large in volume, adjacent to crucial structures, or in patients with contraindications to craniotomy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9606413/ /pubmed/36313491 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.893480 Text en Copyright © 2022 Gong, Ding, Knisely, Wang, Pan, Wang, Zhang, Wu, Dai, Yu and Tang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Gong, Xiu Ding, Jianbo Knisely, Jonathan P. S. Wang, Enmin Pan, Li Wang, Binjiang Zhang, Nan Wu, Hanfeng Dai, Jiazhong Yu, Tonggang Tang, Xuqun Dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery for meningiomas: A retrospective study in a single center |
title | Dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery for meningiomas: A retrospective study in a single center |
title_full | Dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery for meningiomas: A retrospective study in a single center |
title_fullStr | Dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery for meningiomas: A retrospective study in a single center |
title_full_unstemmed | Dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery for meningiomas: A retrospective study in a single center |
title_short | Dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery for meningiomas: A retrospective study in a single center |
title_sort | dose-staged gamma knife radiosurgery for meningiomas: a retrospective study in a single center |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9606413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36313491 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.893480 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gongxiu dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter AT dingjianbo dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter AT kniselyjonathanps dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter AT wangenmin dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter AT panli dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter AT wangbinjiang dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter AT zhangnan dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter AT wuhanfeng dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter AT daijiazhong dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter AT yutonggang dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter AT tangxuqun dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter |