Cargando…

Dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery for meningiomas: A retrospective study in a single center

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to study the efficiency and safety of a dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery strategy for large meningiomas or meningiomas close to important nerve structures. METHODS: This study evaluates the outcome of a prospectively accrued series of 71 consecutive patients with meni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gong, Xiu, Ding, Jianbo, Knisely, Jonathan P. S., Wang, Enmin, Pan, Li, Wang, Binjiang, Zhang, Nan, Wu, Hanfeng, Dai, Jiazhong, Yu, Tonggang, Tang, Xuqun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9606413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36313491
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.893480
_version_ 1784818292893941760
author Gong, Xiu
Ding, Jianbo
Knisely, Jonathan P. S.
Wang, Enmin
Pan, Li
Wang, Binjiang
Zhang, Nan
Wu, Hanfeng
Dai, Jiazhong
Yu, Tonggang
Tang, Xuqun
author_facet Gong, Xiu
Ding, Jianbo
Knisely, Jonathan P. S.
Wang, Enmin
Pan, Li
Wang, Binjiang
Zhang, Nan
Wu, Hanfeng
Dai, Jiazhong
Yu, Tonggang
Tang, Xuqun
author_sort Gong, Xiu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to study the efficiency and safety of a dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery strategy for large meningiomas or meningiomas close to important nerve structures. METHODS: This study evaluates the outcome of a prospectively accrued series of 71 consecutive patients with meningiomas treated with staged dose-fractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery. The average peripheral doses for the first and second fractions were 9.0 ± 0.9 Gy (8–12 Gy) and 8.6 ± 0.7 Gy (range, 7–10 Gy), respectively. The interval between fractions was 6.1 ± 1.9 months (range, 3–12 months). The median follow-up time was 36 months (12–96 months). RESULTS: During the follow-up period after the second fraction, 97.2% achieved tumor control in our series. A total of 2 patients exhibited local recurrence at 30 and 60 months after the second fraction, respectively. No treatment-related complications or new long-term neurological dysfunctions were reported. MRIs observed slightly or moderately increased peritumoral edema in six patients, but no specific neurological complaints are attributed to this finding. CONCLUSION: This study investigates the efficiency and safety of dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery as an alternative option for meningiomas that were large in volume, adjacent to crucial structures, or in patients with contraindications to craniotomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9606413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96064132022-10-28 Dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery for meningiomas: A retrospective study in a single center Gong, Xiu Ding, Jianbo Knisely, Jonathan P. S. Wang, Enmin Pan, Li Wang, Binjiang Zhang, Nan Wu, Hanfeng Dai, Jiazhong Yu, Tonggang Tang, Xuqun Front Neurol Neurology OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to study the efficiency and safety of a dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery strategy for large meningiomas or meningiomas close to important nerve structures. METHODS: This study evaluates the outcome of a prospectively accrued series of 71 consecutive patients with meningiomas treated with staged dose-fractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery. The average peripheral doses for the first and second fractions were 9.0 ± 0.9 Gy (8–12 Gy) and 8.6 ± 0.7 Gy (range, 7–10 Gy), respectively. The interval between fractions was 6.1 ± 1.9 months (range, 3–12 months). The median follow-up time was 36 months (12–96 months). RESULTS: During the follow-up period after the second fraction, 97.2% achieved tumor control in our series. A total of 2 patients exhibited local recurrence at 30 and 60 months after the second fraction, respectively. No treatment-related complications or new long-term neurological dysfunctions were reported. MRIs observed slightly or moderately increased peritumoral edema in six patients, but no specific neurological complaints are attributed to this finding. CONCLUSION: This study investigates the efficiency and safety of dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery as an alternative option for meningiomas that were large in volume, adjacent to crucial structures, or in patients with contraindications to craniotomy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9606413/ /pubmed/36313491 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.893480 Text en Copyright © 2022 Gong, Ding, Knisely, Wang, Pan, Wang, Zhang, Wu, Dai, Yu and Tang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Gong, Xiu
Ding, Jianbo
Knisely, Jonathan P. S.
Wang, Enmin
Pan, Li
Wang, Binjiang
Zhang, Nan
Wu, Hanfeng
Dai, Jiazhong
Yu, Tonggang
Tang, Xuqun
Dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery for meningiomas: A retrospective study in a single center
title Dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery for meningiomas: A retrospective study in a single center
title_full Dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery for meningiomas: A retrospective study in a single center
title_fullStr Dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery for meningiomas: A retrospective study in a single center
title_full_unstemmed Dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery for meningiomas: A retrospective study in a single center
title_short Dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery for meningiomas: A retrospective study in a single center
title_sort dose-staged gamma knife radiosurgery for meningiomas: a retrospective study in a single center
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9606413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36313491
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.893480
work_keys_str_mv AT gongxiu dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter
AT dingjianbo dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter
AT kniselyjonathanps dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter
AT wangenmin dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter
AT panli dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter
AT wangbinjiang dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter
AT zhangnan dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter
AT wuhanfeng dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter
AT daijiazhong dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter
AT yutonggang dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter
AT tangxuqun dosestagedgammakniferadiosurgeryformeningiomasaretrospectivestudyinasinglecenter