Cargando…
Radiation distribution in a hybrid operating room, utilizing different X-ray imaging systems: investigations to minimize occupational exposure
OBJECTIVES: To reduce occupational radiation exposure in a hybrid operating room (OR) used for three-dimensional (3D) image guided spine procedures. The effects of staff positioning, different X-ray imaging systems, and freestanding radiation protection shields (RPSs) were considered. METHODS: An an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9606514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34750111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018220 |
_version_ | 1784818314776674304 |
---|---|
author | Cewe, Paulina Vorbau, Robert Omar, Artur Elmi-Terander, Adrian Edström, Erik |
author_facet | Cewe, Paulina Vorbau, Robert Omar, Artur Elmi-Terander, Adrian Edström, Erik |
author_sort | Cewe, Paulina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To reduce occupational radiation exposure in a hybrid operating room (OR) used for three-dimensional (3D) image guided spine procedures. The effects of staff positioning, different X-ray imaging systems, and freestanding radiation protection shields (RPSs) were considered. METHODS: An anthropomorphic phantom was imaged with a robotic ceiling mounted hybrid OR C-arm cone beam CT (hCBCT), a mobile O-arm CBCT (oCBCT), and a mobile two-dimensional C-arm fluoroscopy system. The resulting scatter doses were measured at different positions in the hybrid OR using active personal dosimeters and an ionization chamber. Two types of RPSs were evaluated. RESULTS: Using the hCBCT system instead of the oCBCT system reduced the occupational radiation dose on average by 22%. At 200 cm from the phantom, scatter doses from the hCBCT were 27% lower compared with the oCBCT. One rotational acquisition with hCBCT or oCBCT corresponded to 12 or 16 min of fluoroscopy with the C-arm, respectively. The scatter dose decreased by more than 90% behind an RPS. However, the protection was slightly less effective at 60 cm behind the RPS, due to tertiary scatter from the surroundings. CONCLUSIONS: For 3D image guided spine procedures in the hybrid OR, occupational radiation exposure is lowered by using hCBCT rather than oCBCT. Radiation exposure can also be decreased by optimal staff positioning in the OR, considering distance to the source and positioning relative to the walls, ceiling, and RPS. In this setting and workflow, staff can use RPSs instead of heavy aprons during intraoperative CBCT imaging, to achieve effective whole body dose reduction with improved comfort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9606514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96065142022-10-28 Radiation distribution in a hybrid operating room, utilizing different X-ray imaging systems: investigations to minimize occupational exposure Cewe, Paulina Vorbau, Robert Omar, Artur Elmi-Terander, Adrian Edström, Erik J Neurointerv Surg New Devices and Techniques OBJECTIVES: To reduce occupational radiation exposure in a hybrid operating room (OR) used for three-dimensional (3D) image guided spine procedures. The effects of staff positioning, different X-ray imaging systems, and freestanding radiation protection shields (RPSs) were considered. METHODS: An anthropomorphic phantom was imaged with a robotic ceiling mounted hybrid OR C-arm cone beam CT (hCBCT), a mobile O-arm CBCT (oCBCT), and a mobile two-dimensional C-arm fluoroscopy system. The resulting scatter doses were measured at different positions in the hybrid OR using active personal dosimeters and an ionization chamber. Two types of RPSs were evaluated. RESULTS: Using the hCBCT system instead of the oCBCT system reduced the occupational radiation dose on average by 22%. At 200 cm from the phantom, scatter doses from the hCBCT were 27% lower compared with the oCBCT. One rotational acquisition with hCBCT or oCBCT corresponded to 12 or 16 min of fluoroscopy with the C-arm, respectively. The scatter dose decreased by more than 90% behind an RPS. However, the protection was slightly less effective at 60 cm behind the RPS, due to tertiary scatter from the surroundings. CONCLUSIONS: For 3D image guided spine procedures in the hybrid OR, occupational radiation exposure is lowered by using hCBCT rather than oCBCT. Radiation exposure can also be decreased by optimal staff positioning in the OR, considering distance to the source and positioning relative to the walls, ceiling, and RPS. In this setting and workflow, staff can use RPSs instead of heavy aprons during intraoperative CBCT imaging, to achieve effective whole body dose reduction with improved comfort. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11 2021-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9606514/ /pubmed/34750111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018220 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | New Devices and Techniques Cewe, Paulina Vorbau, Robert Omar, Artur Elmi-Terander, Adrian Edström, Erik Radiation distribution in a hybrid operating room, utilizing different X-ray imaging systems: investigations to minimize occupational exposure |
title | Radiation distribution in a hybrid operating room, utilizing different X-ray imaging systems: investigations to minimize occupational exposure |
title_full | Radiation distribution in a hybrid operating room, utilizing different X-ray imaging systems: investigations to minimize occupational exposure |
title_fullStr | Radiation distribution in a hybrid operating room, utilizing different X-ray imaging systems: investigations to minimize occupational exposure |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiation distribution in a hybrid operating room, utilizing different X-ray imaging systems: investigations to minimize occupational exposure |
title_short | Radiation distribution in a hybrid operating room, utilizing different X-ray imaging systems: investigations to minimize occupational exposure |
title_sort | radiation distribution in a hybrid operating room, utilizing different x-ray imaging systems: investigations to minimize occupational exposure |
topic | New Devices and Techniques |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9606514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34750111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018220 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cewepaulina radiationdistributioninahybridoperatingroomutilizingdifferentxrayimagingsystemsinvestigationstominimizeoccupationalexposure AT vorbaurobert radiationdistributioninahybridoperatingroomutilizingdifferentxrayimagingsystemsinvestigationstominimizeoccupationalexposure AT omarartur radiationdistributioninahybridoperatingroomutilizingdifferentxrayimagingsystemsinvestigationstominimizeoccupationalexposure AT elmiteranderadrian radiationdistributioninahybridoperatingroomutilizingdifferentxrayimagingsystemsinvestigationstominimizeoccupationalexposure AT edstromerik radiationdistributioninahybridoperatingroomutilizingdifferentxrayimagingsystemsinvestigationstominimizeoccupationalexposure |