Cargando…

Virtual conversational agents versus online forms: Patient experience and preferences for health data collection

OBJECTIVE: Virtual conversational agents, or chatbots, have emerged as a novel approach to health data collection. However, research on patient perceptions of chatbots in comparison to traditional online forms is sparse. This study aimed to compare and assess the experience of completing a health as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soni, Hiral, Ivanova, Julia, Wilczewski, Hattie, Bailey, Alexandra, Ong, Triton, Narma, Alexa, Bunnell, Brian E., Welch, Brandon M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9606606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36310920
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.954069
_version_ 1784818333368975360
author Soni, Hiral
Ivanova, Julia
Wilczewski, Hattie
Bailey, Alexandra
Ong, Triton
Narma, Alexa
Bunnell, Brian E.
Welch, Brandon M.
author_facet Soni, Hiral
Ivanova, Julia
Wilczewski, Hattie
Bailey, Alexandra
Ong, Triton
Narma, Alexa
Bunnell, Brian E.
Welch, Brandon M.
author_sort Soni, Hiral
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Virtual conversational agents, or chatbots, have emerged as a novel approach to health data collection. However, research on patient perceptions of chatbots in comparison to traditional online forms is sparse. This study aimed to compare and assess the experience of completing a health assessment using a chatbot vs. an online form. METHODS: A counterbalanced, within-subject experimental design was used with participants recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk). Participants completed a standardized health assessment using a chatbot (i.e., Dokbot) and an online form (i.e., REDCap), each followed by usability and experience questionnaires. To address poor data quality and preserve integrity of mTurk responses, we employed a thorough data cleaning process informed by previous literature. Quantitative (descriptive and inferential statistics) and qualitative (thematic analysis and complex coding query) approaches were used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 391 participants were recruited, 185 of whom were excluded, resulting in a final sample size of 206 individuals. Most participants (69.9%) preferred the chatbot over the online form. Average Net Promoter Score was higher for the chatbot (NPS = 24) than the online form (NPS = 13) at a statistically significant level. System Usability Scale scores were also higher for the chatbot (i.e. 69.7 vs. 67.7), but this difference was not statistically significant. The chatbot took longer to complete but was perceived as conversational, interactive, and intuitive. The online form received favorable comments for its familiar survey-like interface. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that a chatbot provided superior engagement, intuitiveness, and interactivity despite increased completion time compared to online forms. Knowledge of patient preferences and barriers will inform future design and development of recommendations and best practice for chatbots for healthcare data collection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9606606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96066062022-10-28 Virtual conversational agents versus online forms: Patient experience and preferences for health data collection Soni, Hiral Ivanova, Julia Wilczewski, Hattie Bailey, Alexandra Ong, Triton Narma, Alexa Bunnell, Brian E. Welch, Brandon M. Front Digit Health Digital Health OBJECTIVE: Virtual conversational agents, or chatbots, have emerged as a novel approach to health data collection. However, research on patient perceptions of chatbots in comparison to traditional online forms is sparse. This study aimed to compare and assess the experience of completing a health assessment using a chatbot vs. an online form. METHODS: A counterbalanced, within-subject experimental design was used with participants recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk). Participants completed a standardized health assessment using a chatbot (i.e., Dokbot) and an online form (i.e., REDCap), each followed by usability and experience questionnaires. To address poor data quality and preserve integrity of mTurk responses, we employed a thorough data cleaning process informed by previous literature. Quantitative (descriptive and inferential statistics) and qualitative (thematic analysis and complex coding query) approaches were used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 391 participants were recruited, 185 of whom were excluded, resulting in a final sample size of 206 individuals. Most participants (69.9%) preferred the chatbot over the online form. Average Net Promoter Score was higher for the chatbot (NPS = 24) than the online form (NPS = 13) at a statistically significant level. System Usability Scale scores were also higher for the chatbot (i.e. 69.7 vs. 67.7), but this difference was not statistically significant. The chatbot took longer to complete but was perceived as conversational, interactive, and intuitive. The online form received favorable comments for its familiar survey-like interface. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that a chatbot provided superior engagement, intuitiveness, and interactivity despite increased completion time compared to online forms. Knowledge of patient preferences and barriers will inform future design and development of recommendations and best practice for chatbots for healthcare data collection. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9606606/ /pubmed/36310920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.954069 Text en © 2022 Soni, Ivanova, Wilczewski, Bailey, Ong, Narma, Bunnell and Welch. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Digital Health
Soni, Hiral
Ivanova, Julia
Wilczewski, Hattie
Bailey, Alexandra
Ong, Triton
Narma, Alexa
Bunnell, Brian E.
Welch, Brandon M.
Virtual conversational agents versus online forms: Patient experience and preferences for health data collection
title Virtual conversational agents versus online forms: Patient experience and preferences for health data collection
title_full Virtual conversational agents versus online forms: Patient experience and preferences for health data collection
title_fullStr Virtual conversational agents versus online forms: Patient experience and preferences for health data collection
title_full_unstemmed Virtual conversational agents versus online forms: Patient experience and preferences for health data collection
title_short Virtual conversational agents versus online forms: Patient experience and preferences for health data collection
title_sort virtual conversational agents versus online forms: patient experience and preferences for health data collection
topic Digital Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9606606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36310920
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.954069
work_keys_str_mv AT sonihiral virtualconversationalagentsversusonlineformspatientexperienceandpreferencesforhealthdatacollection
AT ivanovajulia virtualconversationalagentsversusonlineformspatientexperienceandpreferencesforhealthdatacollection
AT wilczewskihattie virtualconversationalagentsversusonlineformspatientexperienceandpreferencesforhealthdatacollection
AT baileyalexandra virtualconversationalagentsversusonlineformspatientexperienceandpreferencesforhealthdatacollection
AT ongtriton virtualconversationalagentsversusonlineformspatientexperienceandpreferencesforhealthdatacollection
AT narmaalexa virtualconversationalagentsversusonlineformspatientexperienceandpreferencesforhealthdatacollection
AT bunnellbriane virtualconversationalagentsversusonlineformspatientexperienceandpreferencesforhealthdatacollection
AT welchbrandonm virtualconversationalagentsversusonlineformspatientexperienceandpreferencesforhealthdatacollection