Cargando…

Case report and literature review: Malignant adenomyoepithelioma after breast augmentation

BACKGROUND: Breast malignant adenomyoepithelioma (MAME) after breast augmentation has never been reported. CASE SUMMARY: We reported a case of a 55-year-old woman who was diagnosed with breast MAME 16 years after breast augmentation. Breast augmentation was performed on the patient with two 200 ml r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Longqing, Qian, Bei, Yan, Zhecheng, Bing, Kaijian, Mei, Li, Qu, Xincai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9606651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36311924
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.981045
_version_ 1784818342581764096
author Hu, Longqing
Qian, Bei
Yan, Zhecheng
Bing, Kaijian
Mei, Li
Qu, Xincai
author_facet Hu, Longqing
Qian, Bei
Yan, Zhecheng
Bing, Kaijian
Mei, Li
Qu, Xincai
author_sort Hu, Longqing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Breast malignant adenomyoepithelioma (MAME) after breast augmentation has never been reported. CASE SUMMARY: We reported a case of a 55-year-old woman who was diagnosed with breast MAME 16 years after breast augmentation. Breast augmentation was performed on the patient with two 200 ml round textured prostheses in the subpectoral plane through axillary incisions in 2004. However, a breast ultrasound in 2020 revealed a suspicious malignant lump in the right breast, which was finally confirmed as MAME by pathology. Skin-sparing modified radical mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with expander implantation were performed. Subsequently, the patient received three cycles of chemotherapy with the regimen of anthracycline and cyclophosphamide. In the following nearly 2 years of follow-up, no tumor recurrence and metastasis were found, and the overall treatment was satisfactory for the patient. CONCLUSION: Here, we present a unique case in which a patient was diagnosed with breast MAME after breast augmentation. Skin-sparing modified radical mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with expander implantation are feasible approaches that yield at least short-term oncological safety and acceptable aesthetic results. However, whether there is a potential relationship between MAME and breast implants remains to be further explored. Meanwhile, due to the rarity of breast MAME, more authoritative strategies considering both oncological safety and aesthetics to seek better long-term therapeutic effects are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9606651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96066512022-10-28 Case report and literature review: Malignant adenomyoepithelioma after breast augmentation Hu, Longqing Qian, Bei Yan, Zhecheng Bing, Kaijian Mei, Li Qu, Xincai Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Breast malignant adenomyoepithelioma (MAME) after breast augmentation has never been reported. CASE SUMMARY: We reported a case of a 55-year-old woman who was diagnosed with breast MAME 16 years after breast augmentation. Breast augmentation was performed on the patient with two 200 ml round textured prostheses in the subpectoral plane through axillary incisions in 2004. However, a breast ultrasound in 2020 revealed a suspicious malignant lump in the right breast, which was finally confirmed as MAME by pathology. Skin-sparing modified radical mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with expander implantation were performed. Subsequently, the patient received three cycles of chemotherapy with the regimen of anthracycline and cyclophosphamide. In the following nearly 2 years of follow-up, no tumor recurrence and metastasis were found, and the overall treatment was satisfactory for the patient. CONCLUSION: Here, we present a unique case in which a patient was diagnosed with breast MAME after breast augmentation. Skin-sparing modified radical mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with expander implantation are feasible approaches that yield at least short-term oncological safety and acceptable aesthetic results. However, whether there is a potential relationship between MAME and breast implants remains to be further explored. Meanwhile, due to the rarity of breast MAME, more authoritative strategies considering both oncological safety and aesthetics to seek better long-term therapeutic effects are needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9606651/ /pubmed/36311924 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.981045 Text en © 2022 Hu, Qian, Yan, Bing, Mei and Qu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Hu, Longqing
Qian, Bei
Yan, Zhecheng
Bing, Kaijian
Mei, Li
Qu, Xincai
Case report and literature review: Malignant adenomyoepithelioma after breast augmentation
title Case report and literature review: Malignant adenomyoepithelioma after breast augmentation
title_full Case report and literature review: Malignant adenomyoepithelioma after breast augmentation
title_fullStr Case report and literature review: Malignant adenomyoepithelioma after breast augmentation
title_full_unstemmed Case report and literature review: Malignant adenomyoepithelioma after breast augmentation
title_short Case report and literature review: Malignant adenomyoepithelioma after breast augmentation
title_sort case report and literature review: malignant adenomyoepithelioma after breast augmentation
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9606651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36311924
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.981045
work_keys_str_mv AT hulongqing casereportandliteraturereviewmalignantadenomyoepitheliomaafterbreastaugmentation
AT qianbei casereportandliteraturereviewmalignantadenomyoepitheliomaafterbreastaugmentation
AT yanzhecheng casereportandliteraturereviewmalignantadenomyoepitheliomaafterbreastaugmentation
AT bingkaijian casereportandliteraturereviewmalignantadenomyoepitheliomaafterbreastaugmentation
AT meili casereportandliteraturereviewmalignantadenomyoepitheliomaafterbreastaugmentation
AT quxincai casereportandliteraturereviewmalignantadenomyoepitheliomaafterbreastaugmentation