Cargando…
Effects of Brush-Type Ionizer Materials on Virus Inactivation
Many studies have found that bioaerosols are harmful to humans. In particular, infectious viruses, such as the virus that causes COVID-19, are increasing. Therefore, the research on methods for reducing bioaerosols is becoming progressively more important. The purpose of this study was to improve th...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9606954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36287891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10100611 |
_version_ | 1784818419379470336 |
---|---|
author | Heo, Jaeseok Lee, Jooyeon Park, Duckshin |
author_facet | Heo, Jaeseok Lee, Jooyeon Park, Duckshin |
author_sort | Heo, Jaeseok |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many studies have found that bioaerosols are harmful to humans. In particular, infectious viruses, such as the virus that causes COVID-19, are increasing. Therefore, the research on methods for reducing bioaerosols is becoming progressively more important. The purpose of this study was to improve the existing electrostatic precipitator, which generates high concentrations of ozone, by reducing bioaerosols effectively without significant ozone production. A brush-type ionizer was studied as a replacement for the existing electrostatic precipitator. The study, which was conducted at the laboratory scale, determined the amounts of ions generated with different ionizer materials (carbon, copper, and stainless steel) and voltages (−1, −2, and −3 kV), as well as it compared the virus inactivation efficiency under the various conditions. As a result, about two million ions were produced when a voltage of −3 kV was applied to all of the materials, and 99.9 ± 0.2% and 98.8 ± 0.6% virus inactivation efficiencies were confirmed in the cases of carbon and copper, respectively. In addition, an assessment of the effect of flow velocity confirmed that the inactivation efficiency decreased as the flow velocity increased. However, the results for the flow velocities of 0.2 and 0.4 m/s had similar trends. Therefore, this system can be used with flow velocities up to 0.4 m/s. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9606954 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96069542022-10-28 Effects of Brush-Type Ionizer Materials on Virus Inactivation Heo, Jaeseok Lee, Jooyeon Park, Duckshin Toxics Article Many studies have found that bioaerosols are harmful to humans. In particular, infectious viruses, such as the virus that causes COVID-19, are increasing. Therefore, the research on methods for reducing bioaerosols is becoming progressively more important. The purpose of this study was to improve the existing electrostatic precipitator, which generates high concentrations of ozone, by reducing bioaerosols effectively without significant ozone production. A brush-type ionizer was studied as a replacement for the existing electrostatic precipitator. The study, which was conducted at the laboratory scale, determined the amounts of ions generated with different ionizer materials (carbon, copper, and stainless steel) and voltages (−1, −2, and −3 kV), as well as it compared the virus inactivation efficiency under the various conditions. As a result, about two million ions were produced when a voltage of −3 kV was applied to all of the materials, and 99.9 ± 0.2% and 98.8 ± 0.6% virus inactivation efficiencies were confirmed in the cases of carbon and copper, respectively. In addition, an assessment of the effect of flow velocity confirmed that the inactivation efficiency decreased as the flow velocity increased. However, the results for the flow velocities of 0.2 and 0.4 m/s had similar trends. Therefore, this system can be used with flow velocities up to 0.4 m/s. MDPI 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9606954/ /pubmed/36287891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10100611 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Heo, Jaeseok Lee, Jooyeon Park, Duckshin Effects of Brush-Type Ionizer Materials on Virus Inactivation |
title | Effects of Brush-Type Ionizer Materials on Virus Inactivation |
title_full | Effects of Brush-Type Ionizer Materials on Virus Inactivation |
title_fullStr | Effects of Brush-Type Ionizer Materials on Virus Inactivation |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Brush-Type Ionizer Materials on Virus Inactivation |
title_short | Effects of Brush-Type Ionizer Materials on Virus Inactivation |
title_sort | effects of brush-type ionizer materials on virus inactivation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9606954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36287891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10100611 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heojaeseok effectsofbrushtypeionizermaterialsonvirusinactivation AT leejooyeon effectsofbrushtypeionizermaterialsonvirusinactivation AT parkduckshin effectsofbrushtypeionizermaterialsonvirusinactivation |