Cargando…

Non-Supported and PET-Supported Chitosan Membranes for Pervaporation: Production, Characterization, and Performance

The objective of this study was to develop non-supported and PET-supported chitosan membranes that were cross-linked with glutaraldehyde, then evaluate their physical–chemical, morphological, and mechanical properties, and evaluate their performance in the separation of ethanol/water and limonene/li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silvestre, Wendel Paulo, Duarte, Jocelei, Tessaro, Isabel Cristina, Baldasso, Camila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9607258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36295689
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12100930
_version_ 1784818497885306880
author Silvestre, Wendel Paulo
Duarte, Jocelei
Tessaro, Isabel Cristina
Baldasso, Camila
author_facet Silvestre, Wendel Paulo
Duarte, Jocelei
Tessaro, Isabel Cristina
Baldasso, Camila
author_sort Silvestre, Wendel Paulo
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to develop non-supported and PET-supported chitosan membranes that were cross-linked with glutaraldehyde, then evaluate their physical–chemical, morphological, and mechanical properties, and evaluate their performance in the separation of ethanol/water and limonene/linalool synthetic mixtures by hydrophilic and target-organophilic pervaporation, respectively. The presence of a PET layer did not affect most of the physical-chemical parameters of the membranes, but the mechanical properties were enhanced, especially the Young modulus (76 MPa to 398 MPa), tensile strength (16 MPa to 27 MPa), and elongation at break (7% to 26%), rendering the supported membrane more resistant. Regarding the pervaporation tests, no permeate was obtained in target-organophilic pervaporation tests, regardless of membrane type. The support layer influenced the hydrophilic pervaporation parameters of the supported membrane, especially in reducing transmembrane flux (0.397 kg∙m(−2)∙h(−1) to 0.121 kg∙m(−2)∙h(−1)) and increasing membrane selectivity (611 to 1974). However, the pervaporation separation index has not differed between membranes (228 for the non-supported and 218 for the PET-supported membrane), indicating that, overall, both membranes had a similar performance. Thus, the applicability of each membrane is linked to specific applications that require a more resistant membrane, greater transmembrane fluxes, and higher selectivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9607258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96072582022-10-28 Non-Supported and PET-Supported Chitosan Membranes for Pervaporation: Production, Characterization, and Performance Silvestre, Wendel Paulo Duarte, Jocelei Tessaro, Isabel Cristina Baldasso, Camila Membranes (Basel) Article The objective of this study was to develop non-supported and PET-supported chitosan membranes that were cross-linked with glutaraldehyde, then evaluate their physical–chemical, morphological, and mechanical properties, and evaluate their performance in the separation of ethanol/water and limonene/linalool synthetic mixtures by hydrophilic and target-organophilic pervaporation, respectively. The presence of a PET layer did not affect most of the physical-chemical parameters of the membranes, but the mechanical properties were enhanced, especially the Young modulus (76 MPa to 398 MPa), tensile strength (16 MPa to 27 MPa), and elongation at break (7% to 26%), rendering the supported membrane more resistant. Regarding the pervaporation tests, no permeate was obtained in target-organophilic pervaporation tests, regardless of membrane type. The support layer influenced the hydrophilic pervaporation parameters of the supported membrane, especially in reducing transmembrane flux (0.397 kg∙m(−2)∙h(−1) to 0.121 kg∙m(−2)∙h(−1)) and increasing membrane selectivity (611 to 1974). However, the pervaporation separation index has not differed between membranes (228 for the non-supported and 218 for the PET-supported membrane), indicating that, overall, both membranes had a similar performance. Thus, the applicability of each membrane is linked to specific applications that require a more resistant membrane, greater transmembrane fluxes, and higher selectivity. MDPI 2022-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9607258/ /pubmed/36295689 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12100930 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Silvestre, Wendel Paulo
Duarte, Jocelei
Tessaro, Isabel Cristina
Baldasso, Camila
Non-Supported and PET-Supported Chitosan Membranes for Pervaporation: Production, Characterization, and Performance
title Non-Supported and PET-Supported Chitosan Membranes for Pervaporation: Production, Characterization, and Performance
title_full Non-Supported and PET-Supported Chitosan Membranes for Pervaporation: Production, Characterization, and Performance
title_fullStr Non-Supported and PET-Supported Chitosan Membranes for Pervaporation: Production, Characterization, and Performance
title_full_unstemmed Non-Supported and PET-Supported Chitosan Membranes for Pervaporation: Production, Characterization, and Performance
title_short Non-Supported and PET-Supported Chitosan Membranes for Pervaporation: Production, Characterization, and Performance
title_sort non-supported and pet-supported chitosan membranes for pervaporation: production, characterization, and performance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9607258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36295689
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12100930
work_keys_str_mv AT silvestrewendelpaulo nonsupportedandpetsupportedchitosanmembranesforpervaporationproductioncharacterizationandperformance
AT duartejocelei nonsupportedandpetsupportedchitosanmembranesforpervaporationproductioncharacterizationandperformance
AT tessaroisabelcristina nonsupportedandpetsupportedchitosanmembranesforpervaporationproductioncharacterizationandperformance
AT baldassocamila nonsupportedandpetsupportedchitosanmembranesforpervaporationproductioncharacterizationandperformance