Cargando…

Water Conductivity Evaluation of Fault F22 Based on Comprehensive Analysis of Multisource Information

[Image: see text] Mine water disasters are one of the main disasters threatening safe mine operations. If a fault becomes a water guide channel, it often causes serious water inrush accidents in mining. Therefore, accurate evaluation of fault hydraulic conductivity is very important for the predicti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Jing, Wang, Fang, Xie, Daolei, Zhang, Huide, Hou, Zhaolong, Jiang, Xinghong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9607681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36312402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c04597
_version_ 1784818607017951232
author Han, Jing
Wang, Fang
Xie, Daolei
Zhang, Huide
Hou, Zhaolong
Jiang, Xinghong
author_facet Han, Jing
Wang, Fang
Xie, Daolei
Zhang, Huide
Hou, Zhaolong
Jiang, Xinghong
author_sort Han, Jing
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Mine water disasters are one of the main disasters threatening safe mine operations. If a fault becomes a water guide channel, it often causes serious water inrush accidents in mining. Therefore, accurate evaluation of fault hydraulic conductivity is very important for the prediction and prevention of mine water disasters. To prevent and control mine water disasters and ensure safe mining of coal seams in the presence of faults, this paper takes the F22 fault in the Jinqiao Coal Mine as an example; proposes three highly applicable fault water conductivity evaluation methods based on analysis of water–rock stress, difference analysis of hydrochemical characteristics, and difference analysis of water pressures for the same aquifer on both sides of the fault; and comprehensively analyzes and evaluates the water conductivity of the F22 fault. The results are as follows: the cross-sectional pressure of the fault is greater than the aquifer water pressure and the plastic deformation strength of mudstone combined. The hydrochemical characteristics of the three-ash aquifers on both sides of the fault are obviously different. The water in the three-ash aquifer on one side of the fault has been drained for a long time, while the water pressure on the other side of the fault has not changed significantly. Based on a comprehensive analysis, it is judged that the F22 fault is not water-conducting. The evaluation results are consistent with geophysical explorations and the actual mine roadway exposure, which verifies the feasibility and rationality of the fault water conductivity evaluation method described above.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9607681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96076812022-10-28 Water Conductivity Evaluation of Fault F22 Based on Comprehensive Analysis of Multisource Information Han, Jing Wang, Fang Xie, Daolei Zhang, Huide Hou, Zhaolong Jiang, Xinghong ACS Omega [Image: see text] Mine water disasters are one of the main disasters threatening safe mine operations. If a fault becomes a water guide channel, it often causes serious water inrush accidents in mining. Therefore, accurate evaluation of fault hydraulic conductivity is very important for the prediction and prevention of mine water disasters. To prevent and control mine water disasters and ensure safe mining of coal seams in the presence of faults, this paper takes the F22 fault in the Jinqiao Coal Mine as an example; proposes three highly applicable fault water conductivity evaluation methods based on analysis of water–rock stress, difference analysis of hydrochemical characteristics, and difference analysis of water pressures for the same aquifer on both sides of the fault; and comprehensively analyzes and evaluates the water conductivity of the F22 fault. The results are as follows: the cross-sectional pressure of the fault is greater than the aquifer water pressure and the plastic deformation strength of mudstone combined. The hydrochemical characteristics of the three-ash aquifers on both sides of the fault are obviously different. The water in the three-ash aquifer on one side of the fault has been drained for a long time, while the water pressure on the other side of the fault has not changed significantly. Based on a comprehensive analysis, it is judged that the F22 fault is not water-conducting. The evaluation results are consistent with geophysical explorations and the actual mine roadway exposure, which verifies the feasibility and rationality of the fault water conductivity evaluation method described above. American Chemical Society 2022-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9607681/ /pubmed/36312402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c04597 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Han, Jing
Wang, Fang
Xie, Daolei
Zhang, Huide
Hou, Zhaolong
Jiang, Xinghong
Water Conductivity Evaluation of Fault F22 Based on Comprehensive Analysis of Multisource Information
title Water Conductivity Evaluation of Fault F22 Based on Comprehensive Analysis of Multisource Information
title_full Water Conductivity Evaluation of Fault F22 Based on Comprehensive Analysis of Multisource Information
title_fullStr Water Conductivity Evaluation of Fault F22 Based on Comprehensive Analysis of Multisource Information
title_full_unstemmed Water Conductivity Evaluation of Fault F22 Based on Comprehensive Analysis of Multisource Information
title_short Water Conductivity Evaluation of Fault F22 Based on Comprehensive Analysis of Multisource Information
title_sort water conductivity evaluation of fault f22 based on comprehensive analysis of multisource information
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9607681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36312402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c04597
work_keys_str_mv AT hanjing waterconductivityevaluationoffaultf22basedoncomprehensiveanalysisofmultisourceinformation
AT wangfang waterconductivityevaluationoffaultf22basedoncomprehensiveanalysisofmultisourceinformation
AT xiedaolei waterconductivityevaluationoffaultf22basedoncomprehensiveanalysisofmultisourceinformation
AT zhanghuide waterconductivityevaluationoffaultf22basedoncomprehensiveanalysisofmultisourceinformation
AT houzhaolong waterconductivityevaluationoffaultf22basedoncomprehensiveanalysisofmultisourceinformation
AT jiangxinghong waterconductivityevaluationoffaultf22basedoncomprehensiveanalysisofmultisourceinformation