Cargando…

Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19

BACKGROUND: In-person directly observed therapy (DOT) is commonly used for tuberculosis (TB) treatment monitoring in the US, with increasing usage of video-DOT (vDOT). We evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on TB treatment adherence, and utilization and effectiveness of vDOT. METHODS: We abstracted rou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lippincott, Christopher K., Perry, Allison, Munk, Elizabeth, Maltas, Gina, Shah, Maunank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9607764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36289485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07787-4
_version_ 1784818625586135040
author Lippincott, Christopher K.
Perry, Allison
Munk, Elizabeth
Maltas, Gina
Shah, Maunank
author_facet Lippincott, Christopher K.
Perry, Allison
Munk, Elizabeth
Maltas, Gina
Shah, Maunank
author_sort Lippincott, Christopher K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In-person directly observed therapy (DOT) is commonly used for tuberculosis (TB) treatment monitoring in the US, with increasing usage of video-DOT (vDOT). We evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on TB treatment adherence, and utilization and effectiveness of vDOT. METHODS: We abstracted routinely collected data on individuals treated for TB disease in Baltimore, Maryland between April 2019 and April 2021. Our primary outcomes were to assess vDOT utilization and treatment adherence, defined as the proportion of prescribed doses (7 days/week) verified by observation (in-person versus video-DOT), comparing individuals in the pre-COVID and COVID (April 2020) periods. RESULTS: Among 52 individuals with TB disease, 24 (46%) received treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. vDOT utilization significantly increased in the COVID period (18/24[75%]) compared to pre-COVID (12/28[43%], p = 0.02). Overall, median verified adherence was similar pre-COVID and COVID periods (65% versus 68%, respectively, p = 0.96). Adherence was significantly higher overall when using vDOT (median 86% [IQR 70–98%]) compared to DOT (median 59% [IQR 55-64%], p < 0.01); this improved adherence with vDOT was evident in both the pre-COVID (median 98% vs. 58%, p < 0.01) and COVID period (median 80% vs. 62%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: vDOT utilization increased during the COVID period and was more effective than in-person DOT at verifying ingestion of prescribed treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9607764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96077642022-10-28 Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19 Lippincott, Christopher K. Perry, Allison Munk, Elizabeth Maltas, Gina Shah, Maunank BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: In-person directly observed therapy (DOT) is commonly used for tuberculosis (TB) treatment monitoring in the US, with increasing usage of video-DOT (vDOT). We evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on TB treatment adherence, and utilization and effectiveness of vDOT. METHODS: We abstracted routinely collected data on individuals treated for TB disease in Baltimore, Maryland between April 2019 and April 2021. Our primary outcomes were to assess vDOT utilization and treatment adherence, defined as the proportion of prescribed doses (7 days/week) verified by observation (in-person versus video-DOT), comparing individuals in the pre-COVID and COVID (April 2020) periods. RESULTS: Among 52 individuals with TB disease, 24 (46%) received treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. vDOT utilization significantly increased in the COVID period (18/24[75%]) compared to pre-COVID (12/28[43%], p = 0.02). Overall, median verified adherence was similar pre-COVID and COVID periods (65% versus 68%, respectively, p = 0.96). Adherence was significantly higher overall when using vDOT (median 86% [IQR 70–98%]) compared to DOT (median 59% [IQR 55-64%], p < 0.01); this improved adherence with vDOT was evident in both the pre-COVID (median 98% vs. 58%, p < 0.01) and COVID period (median 80% vs. 62%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: vDOT utilization increased during the COVID period and was more effective than in-person DOT at verifying ingestion of prescribed treatment. BioMed Central 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9607764/ /pubmed/36289485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07787-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lippincott, Christopher K.
Perry, Allison
Munk, Elizabeth
Maltas, Gina
Shah, Maunank
Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19
title Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19
title_full Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19
title_fullStr Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19
title_short Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19
title_sort tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of covid-19
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9607764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36289485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07787-4
work_keys_str_mv AT lippincottchristopherk tuberculosistreatmentadherenceintheeraofcovid19
AT perryallison tuberculosistreatmentadherenceintheeraofcovid19
AT munkelizabeth tuberculosistreatmentadherenceintheeraofcovid19
AT maltasgina tuberculosistreatmentadherenceintheeraofcovid19
AT shahmaunank tuberculosistreatmentadherenceintheeraofcovid19