Cargando…

Cadaveric Biomechanical Evaluation of Capsular Constraint and Microinstability After Hip Capsulotomy and Repair

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear if capsular management contributes to iatrogenic instability (microinstability) after hip arthroscopy. PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in torque, stiffness, and femoral head displacement after capsulotomy and repair in a cadaveric model. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laborator...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donnelly, Emma, Vakili, Samira, Getgood, Alan, Willing, Ryan, Degen, Ryan M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9608050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36313006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221128348
_version_ 1784818689723334656
author Donnelly, Emma
Vakili, Samira
Getgood, Alan
Willing, Ryan
Degen, Ryan M.
author_facet Donnelly, Emma
Vakili, Samira
Getgood, Alan
Willing, Ryan
Degen, Ryan M.
author_sort Donnelly, Emma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It remains unclear if capsular management contributes to iatrogenic instability (microinstability) after hip arthroscopy. PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in torque, stiffness, and femoral head displacement after capsulotomy and repair in a cadaveric model. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A biomechanical analysis was performed using 10 cadaveric hip specimens. Each specimen was tested under the following conditions: (1) intact, (2) portals, (3) interportal capsulotomy (IPC), (4) IPC repair, (5) T-capsulotomy (T-cap), (6) partial T-cap repair, and (7) T-cap repair. Each capsular state was tested in neutral (0°) and then 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion, with forces applied to achieve the displacement-controlled baseline limit of external rotation (ER), internal rotation (IR), abduction, and adduction. The resultant end-range torques and displacement were recorded. RESULTS: For ER, capsulotomies significantly reduced torque and stiffness at 0°, 30°, and 60° and reduced stiffness at 90°; capsular repairs failed to restore torque and stiffness at 0°; and IPC repair failed to restore stiffness at 30° (P < .05 for all). For IR, capsulotomies significantly reduced torque and stiffness at 0°, 30°, and 60° and reduced stiffness at 90°; and capsular repairs failed to restore torque or stiffness at 0°, 30°, and 60° and failed to restore stiffness at 90° (P < .05 for all). For abduction, IPC significantly decreased torque at 60° and 90° and decreased stiffness at all positions; T-cap reduced torque and stiffness at all positions; IPC repair failed to restore stiffness at 0° and 90°; and T-cap repair failed at 0°, 60°, and 90° (P < .05 for all). For adduction, IPC significantly reduced torque at 0° and reduced stiffness at 0° and 30°; T-cap reduced torque at 0° and 90° and reduced stiffness at all positions; IPC repair failed to restore stiffness at 0° and 90°; and T-cap repair failed at 0°, 60°, and 90° (P < .05 for all). There were no statistically significant femoral head translations observed in any testing configurations. CONCLUSION: Complete capsular repair did not always restore intact kinematics, most notably at 0° and 30°. Despite this, there were no significant joint translations to corroborate concerns of microinstability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Caution should be employed when applying rotational torques in lower levels of flexion (0° and 30°).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9608050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96080502022-10-28 Cadaveric Biomechanical Evaluation of Capsular Constraint and Microinstability After Hip Capsulotomy and Repair Donnelly, Emma Vakili, Samira Getgood, Alan Willing, Ryan Degen, Ryan M. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: It remains unclear if capsular management contributes to iatrogenic instability (microinstability) after hip arthroscopy. PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in torque, stiffness, and femoral head displacement after capsulotomy and repair in a cadaveric model. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A biomechanical analysis was performed using 10 cadaveric hip specimens. Each specimen was tested under the following conditions: (1) intact, (2) portals, (3) interportal capsulotomy (IPC), (4) IPC repair, (5) T-capsulotomy (T-cap), (6) partial T-cap repair, and (7) T-cap repair. Each capsular state was tested in neutral (0°) and then 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion, with forces applied to achieve the displacement-controlled baseline limit of external rotation (ER), internal rotation (IR), abduction, and adduction. The resultant end-range torques and displacement were recorded. RESULTS: For ER, capsulotomies significantly reduced torque and stiffness at 0°, 30°, and 60° and reduced stiffness at 90°; capsular repairs failed to restore torque and stiffness at 0°; and IPC repair failed to restore stiffness at 30° (P < .05 for all). For IR, capsulotomies significantly reduced torque and stiffness at 0°, 30°, and 60° and reduced stiffness at 90°; and capsular repairs failed to restore torque or stiffness at 0°, 30°, and 60° and failed to restore stiffness at 90° (P < .05 for all). For abduction, IPC significantly decreased torque at 60° and 90° and decreased stiffness at all positions; T-cap reduced torque and stiffness at all positions; IPC repair failed to restore stiffness at 0° and 90°; and T-cap repair failed at 0°, 60°, and 90° (P < .05 for all). For adduction, IPC significantly reduced torque at 0° and reduced stiffness at 0° and 30°; T-cap reduced torque at 0° and 90° and reduced stiffness at all positions; IPC repair failed to restore stiffness at 0° and 90°; and T-cap repair failed at 0°, 60°, and 90° (P < .05 for all). There were no statistically significant femoral head translations observed in any testing configurations. CONCLUSION: Complete capsular repair did not always restore intact kinematics, most notably at 0° and 30°. Despite this, there were no significant joint translations to corroborate concerns of microinstability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Caution should be employed when applying rotational torques in lower levels of flexion (0° and 30°). SAGE Publications 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9608050/ /pubmed/36313006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221128348 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Donnelly, Emma
Vakili, Samira
Getgood, Alan
Willing, Ryan
Degen, Ryan M.
Cadaveric Biomechanical Evaluation of Capsular Constraint and Microinstability After Hip Capsulotomy and Repair
title Cadaveric Biomechanical Evaluation of Capsular Constraint and Microinstability After Hip Capsulotomy and Repair
title_full Cadaveric Biomechanical Evaluation of Capsular Constraint and Microinstability After Hip Capsulotomy and Repair
title_fullStr Cadaveric Biomechanical Evaluation of Capsular Constraint and Microinstability After Hip Capsulotomy and Repair
title_full_unstemmed Cadaveric Biomechanical Evaluation of Capsular Constraint and Microinstability After Hip Capsulotomy and Repair
title_short Cadaveric Biomechanical Evaluation of Capsular Constraint and Microinstability After Hip Capsulotomy and Repair
title_sort cadaveric biomechanical evaluation of capsular constraint and microinstability after hip capsulotomy and repair
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9608050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36313006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221128348
work_keys_str_mv AT donnellyemma cadavericbiomechanicalevaluationofcapsularconstraintandmicroinstabilityafterhipcapsulotomyandrepair
AT vakilisamira cadavericbiomechanicalevaluationofcapsularconstraintandmicroinstabilityafterhipcapsulotomyandrepair
AT getgoodalan cadavericbiomechanicalevaluationofcapsularconstraintandmicroinstabilityafterhipcapsulotomyandrepair
AT willingryan cadavericbiomechanicalevaluationofcapsularconstraintandmicroinstabilityafterhipcapsulotomyandrepair
AT degenryanm cadavericbiomechanicalevaluationofcapsularconstraintandmicroinstabilityafterhipcapsulotomyandrepair