Cargando…

In Vitro Comparison of MTA and BC RRM-Fast Set Putty as Retrograde Filling Materials

OBJECTIVE: To compare, in vitro, the bioceramic materials (MTA and BC RRM-fast set putty) capacity to prevent microleakage of Enterococcus faecalis over time. METHODS: An experimental design was made with forty extracted human teeth, coronally cut, and prepared to be placed in a leakage system under...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arvelaiz, Carla, Fernandes, Andreina, Graterol, Veronica, Gomez, Katiuska, Gomez-Sosa, Jose Francisco, Caviedes-Bucheli, Javier, Guilarte, Carolina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9608128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36217642
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2022.36036
_version_ 1784818703470166016
author Arvelaiz, Carla
Fernandes, Andreina
Graterol, Veronica
Gomez, Katiuska
Gomez-Sosa, Jose Francisco
Caviedes-Bucheli, Javier
Guilarte, Carolina
author_facet Arvelaiz, Carla
Fernandes, Andreina
Graterol, Veronica
Gomez, Katiuska
Gomez-Sosa, Jose Francisco
Caviedes-Bucheli, Javier
Guilarte, Carolina
author_sort Arvelaiz, Carla
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare, in vitro, the bioceramic materials (MTA and BC RRM-fast set putty) capacity to prevent microleakage of Enterococcus faecalis over time. METHODS: An experimental design was made with forty extracted human teeth, coronally cut, and prepared to be placed in a leakage system under sterile conditions. They were randomly divided into two experimental groups: thirty teeth (fifteen for each of retrograde filling material MTA and BC RRM-fast set putty) and a control group: ten teeth (five positive control, five negative control). The 3 mm root-ends were submerged in a brain-heart infusion broth with a red phenol indicator. The coronal access of each sample was inoculated with E. faecalis every seven days to maintain bacterial viability. The lower chamber was evaluated daily for 30 days to observe the turbidity of the culture medium and establish the presence and day of the filtration. Calculation of the colony-forming units (CFU) was performed for each leaked sample. Fisher's Exact Test was used to verify the association between the presence or absence of leakage of the samples by type of bioceramic material used and the Mann-Whitney U test to verify the existence of a difference between the average of CFU by type of bioceramic material used. The significance level used was α=0.05 and a 95% confidence level, as a decision rule for rejecting the null hypothesis. RESULTS: Of the total samples prepared for each group, leakage was found in 60.0% (9/15) of the MTA group and 40.0% (6/15) of the BC RRM-fast set putty group. All positive controls filtered on the first day of evaluation, while 20% (1/5) of the negative control leaked in the second week. There was no significant difference in leakege between the two groups, nor concerning the bacterial count (P=0.101) and the type of cement used (P=1.000). CONCLUSION: BC RRM-fast set putty was comparable to MTA in resisting bacterial microleakage during the observation time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9608128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96081282022-11-04 In Vitro Comparison of MTA and BC RRM-Fast Set Putty as Retrograde Filling Materials Arvelaiz, Carla Fernandes, Andreina Graterol, Veronica Gomez, Katiuska Gomez-Sosa, Jose Francisco Caviedes-Bucheli, Javier Guilarte, Carolina Eur Endod J Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare, in vitro, the bioceramic materials (MTA and BC RRM-fast set putty) capacity to prevent microleakage of Enterococcus faecalis over time. METHODS: An experimental design was made with forty extracted human teeth, coronally cut, and prepared to be placed in a leakage system under sterile conditions. They were randomly divided into two experimental groups: thirty teeth (fifteen for each of retrograde filling material MTA and BC RRM-fast set putty) and a control group: ten teeth (five positive control, five negative control). The 3 mm root-ends were submerged in a brain-heart infusion broth with a red phenol indicator. The coronal access of each sample was inoculated with E. faecalis every seven days to maintain bacterial viability. The lower chamber was evaluated daily for 30 days to observe the turbidity of the culture medium and establish the presence and day of the filtration. Calculation of the colony-forming units (CFU) was performed for each leaked sample. Fisher's Exact Test was used to verify the association between the presence or absence of leakage of the samples by type of bioceramic material used and the Mann-Whitney U test to verify the existence of a difference between the average of CFU by type of bioceramic material used. The significance level used was α=0.05 and a 95% confidence level, as a decision rule for rejecting the null hypothesis. RESULTS: Of the total samples prepared for each group, leakage was found in 60.0% (9/15) of the MTA group and 40.0% (6/15) of the BC RRM-fast set putty group. All positive controls filtered on the first day of evaluation, while 20% (1/5) of the negative control leaked in the second week. There was no significant difference in leakege between the two groups, nor concerning the bacterial count (P=0.101) and the type of cement used (P=1.000). CONCLUSION: BC RRM-fast set putty was comparable to MTA in resisting bacterial microleakage during the observation time. Kare Publishing 2022-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9608128/ /pubmed/36217642 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2022.36036 Text en © Copyright 2022 by European Endodontic Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Arvelaiz, Carla
Fernandes, Andreina
Graterol, Veronica
Gomez, Katiuska
Gomez-Sosa, Jose Francisco
Caviedes-Bucheli, Javier
Guilarte, Carolina
In Vitro Comparison of MTA and BC RRM-Fast Set Putty as Retrograde Filling Materials
title In Vitro Comparison of MTA and BC RRM-Fast Set Putty as Retrograde Filling Materials
title_full In Vitro Comparison of MTA and BC RRM-Fast Set Putty as Retrograde Filling Materials
title_fullStr In Vitro Comparison of MTA and BC RRM-Fast Set Putty as Retrograde Filling Materials
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Comparison of MTA and BC RRM-Fast Set Putty as Retrograde Filling Materials
title_short In Vitro Comparison of MTA and BC RRM-Fast Set Putty as Retrograde Filling Materials
title_sort in vitro comparison of mta and bc rrm-fast set putty as retrograde filling materials
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9608128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36217642
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2022.36036
work_keys_str_mv AT arvelaizcarla invitrocomparisonofmtaandbcrrmfastsetputtyasretrogradefillingmaterials
AT fernandesandreina invitrocomparisonofmtaandbcrrmfastsetputtyasretrogradefillingmaterials
AT graterolveronica invitrocomparisonofmtaandbcrrmfastsetputtyasretrogradefillingmaterials
AT gomezkatiuska invitrocomparisonofmtaandbcrrmfastsetputtyasretrogradefillingmaterials
AT gomezsosajosefrancisco invitrocomparisonofmtaandbcrrmfastsetputtyasretrogradefillingmaterials
AT caviedesbuchelijavier invitrocomparisonofmtaandbcrrmfastsetputtyasretrogradefillingmaterials
AT guilartecarolina invitrocomparisonofmtaandbcrrmfastsetputtyasretrogradefillingmaterials