Cargando…

Increasing flower species richness in agricultural landscapes alters insect pollinator networks: Implications for bee health and competition

Ecological restoration programs are established to reverse land degradation, mitigate biodiversity loss, and reinstate ecosystem services. Following recent agricultural intensification that led to a decrease in flower diversity and density in rural areas and subsequently to the decline of many insec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doublet, Vincent, Doyle, Toby, Refoy, Isobel, Hedges, Sophie, Carvell, Claire, Brown, Mark J. F., Wilfert, Lena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9608809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36311409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9442
_version_ 1784818859619909632
author Doublet, Vincent
Doyle, Toby
Refoy, Isobel
Hedges, Sophie
Carvell, Claire
Brown, Mark J. F.
Wilfert, Lena
author_facet Doublet, Vincent
Doyle, Toby
Refoy, Isobel
Hedges, Sophie
Carvell, Claire
Brown, Mark J. F.
Wilfert, Lena
author_sort Doublet, Vincent
collection PubMed
description Ecological restoration programs are established to reverse land degradation, mitigate biodiversity loss, and reinstate ecosystem services. Following recent agricultural intensification that led to a decrease in flower diversity and density in rural areas and subsequently to the decline of many insects, conservation measures targeted at pollinators have been established, including sown wildflower strips (WFS) along field margins. Historically successful in establishing a high density of generalist bees and increasing pollinator diversity, the impact of enhanced flower provision on wider ecological interactions and the structure of pollinator networks has been rarely investigated. Here, we tested the effects of increasing flower species richness and flower density in agricultural landscapes on bee‐plant interaction networks. We measured plant species richness and flower density and surveyed honeybee and bumblebee visits on flowers across a range of field margins on 10 UK farms that applied different pollinator conservation measures. We found that both flower species richness and flower density significantly increased bee abundance, in early and late summer, respectively. At the network level, we found that higher flower species richness did not significantly alter bee species' generality indices, but significantly reduced network connectance and marginally reduced niche overlap across honeybees and bumblebee species, a proxy for insect competition. While higher connectance and niche overlap is believed to strengthen network robustness and often is the aim for the restoration of pollinator networks, we argue that carefully designed WFS may benefit bees by partitioning their foraging niche, limiting competition for resources and the potential for disease transmission via shared floral use. We also discuss the need to extend WFS and their positive effects into spring when wild bee populations are established.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9608809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96088092022-10-28 Increasing flower species richness in agricultural landscapes alters insect pollinator networks: Implications for bee health and competition Doublet, Vincent Doyle, Toby Refoy, Isobel Hedges, Sophie Carvell, Claire Brown, Mark J. F. Wilfert, Lena Ecol Evol Research Articles Ecological restoration programs are established to reverse land degradation, mitigate biodiversity loss, and reinstate ecosystem services. Following recent agricultural intensification that led to a decrease in flower diversity and density in rural areas and subsequently to the decline of many insects, conservation measures targeted at pollinators have been established, including sown wildflower strips (WFS) along field margins. Historically successful in establishing a high density of generalist bees and increasing pollinator diversity, the impact of enhanced flower provision on wider ecological interactions and the structure of pollinator networks has been rarely investigated. Here, we tested the effects of increasing flower species richness and flower density in agricultural landscapes on bee‐plant interaction networks. We measured plant species richness and flower density and surveyed honeybee and bumblebee visits on flowers across a range of field margins on 10 UK farms that applied different pollinator conservation measures. We found that both flower species richness and flower density significantly increased bee abundance, in early and late summer, respectively. At the network level, we found that higher flower species richness did not significantly alter bee species' generality indices, but significantly reduced network connectance and marginally reduced niche overlap across honeybees and bumblebee species, a proxy for insect competition. While higher connectance and niche overlap is believed to strengthen network robustness and often is the aim for the restoration of pollinator networks, we argue that carefully designed WFS may benefit bees by partitioning their foraging niche, limiting competition for resources and the potential for disease transmission via shared floral use. We also discuss the need to extend WFS and their positive effects into spring when wild bee populations are established. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9608809/ /pubmed/36311409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9442 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Doublet, Vincent
Doyle, Toby
Refoy, Isobel
Hedges, Sophie
Carvell, Claire
Brown, Mark J. F.
Wilfert, Lena
Increasing flower species richness in agricultural landscapes alters insect pollinator networks: Implications for bee health and competition
title Increasing flower species richness in agricultural landscapes alters insect pollinator networks: Implications for bee health and competition
title_full Increasing flower species richness in agricultural landscapes alters insect pollinator networks: Implications for bee health and competition
title_fullStr Increasing flower species richness in agricultural landscapes alters insect pollinator networks: Implications for bee health and competition
title_full_unstemmed Increasing flower species richness in agricultural landscapes alters insect pollinator networks: Implications for bee health and competition
title_short Increasing flower species richness in agricultural landscapes alters insect pollinator networks: Implications for bee health and competition
title_sort increasing flower species richness in agricultural landscapes alters insect pollinator networks: implications for bee health and competition
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9608809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36311409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9442
work_keys_str_mv AT doubletvincent increasingflowerspeciesrichnessinagriculturallandscapesaltersinsectpollinatornetworksimplicationsforbeehealthandcompetition
AT doyletoby increasingflowerspeciesrichnessinagriculturallandscapesaltersinsectpollinatornetworksimplicationsforbeehealthandcompetition
AT refoyisobel increasingflowerspeciesrichnessinagriculturallandscapesaltersinsectpollinatornetworksimplicationsforbeehealthandcompetition
AT hedgessophie increasingflowerspeciesrichnessinagriculturallandscapesaltersinsectpollinatornetworksimplicationsforbeehealthandcompetition
AT carvellclaire increasingflowerspeciesrichnessinagriculturallandscapesaltersinsectpollinatornetworksimplicationsforbeehealthandcompetition
AT brownmarkjf increasingflowerspeciesrichnessinagriculturallandscapesaltersinsectpollinatornetworksimplicationsforbeehealthandcompetition
AT wilfertlena increasingflowerspeciesrichnessinagriculturallandscapesaltersinsectpollinatornetworksimplicationsforbeehealthandcompetition