Cargando…

Classification and reconstruction of femoral bone defect in the revision of aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses: a 10-year multicenter retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE: This study proposes a system for classifying the aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses and discusses reconstruction methods for revision surgery, based on different classification types. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who received revision surgery f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hou, Zi-Wei, Xu, Ming, Zheng, Kai, Yu, Xiu-Chun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9608886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36303200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05885-7
_version_ 1784818877913366528
author Hou, Zi-Wei
Xu, Ming
Zheng, Kai
Yu, Xiu-Chun
author_facet Hou, Zi-Wei
Xu, Ming
Zheng, Kai
Yu, Xiu-Chun
author_sort Hou, Zi-Wei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study proposes a system for classifying the aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses and discusses reconstruction methods for revision surgery, based on different classification types. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who received revision surgery for aseptic loosening in distal femoral tumor endoprosthesis from January 2008 to December 2020 at 3 bone tumor treatment centers in China. Based on the patient imaging data, we proposed a classification system for the aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses and discussed its revision surgery strategy for various bone defects. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients were included in this study, including 21 males and 10 females aged 15–75 y (average: 44.3 y). First-revision surgery was performed on 24 patients, whereas second-revision surgery was conducted on 7 patients. The 31 patients were classified into different types based on the degree of aseptic loosening: Type I, 12 patients (38.7%); Type IIa, 7 patients (22.5%); Type IIb, 7 patients (22.5%); Type III, 4 patient (12.9%); and Type IV, 1 patient (3.2%). For type I, 11 patients underwent revisions with standard longer-stem prostheses (one with the original prosthesis), and one patient had the original prosthesis plus cortical allograft strut. For type II (a and b), 10 patients underwent revisions with original prosthesis or longer-stem prosthesis and 4 patients combined with cortical allograft strut. For type III, one patient underwent revision with a longer-stem prosthesis and the other 3 patients with a custom short-stem prosthesis. For type IV, only one patient underwent revision with a custom short-stem prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Aseptic loosening of the distal femoral prosthesis can be divided into 4 types: type I, type II (a, b), type III and type IV. The reconstruction methods of our centers for different types of bone defects can offer some reference value in the revision of aseptic loosening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9608886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96088862022-10-28 Classification and reconstruction of femoral bone defect in the revision of aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses: a 10-year multicenter retrospective analysis Hou, Zi-Wei Xu, Ming Zheng, Kai Yu, Xiu-Chun BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research OBJECTIVE: This study proposes a system for classifying the aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses and discusses reconstruction methods for revision surgery, based on different classification types. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who received revision surgery for aseptic loosening in distal femoral tumor endoprosthesis from January 2008 to December 2020 at 3 bone tumor treatment centers in China. Based on the patient imaging data, we proposed a classification system for the aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses and discussed its revision surgery strategy for various bone defects. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients were included in this study, including 21 males and 10 females aged 15–75 y (average: 44.3 y). First-revision surgery was performed on 24 patients, whereas second-revision surgery was conducted on 7 patients. The 31 patients were classified into different types based on the degree of aseptic loosening: Type I, 12 patients (38.7%); Type IIa, 7 patients (22.5%); Type IIb, 7 patients (22.5%); Type III, 4 patient (12.9%); and Type IV, 1 patient (3.2%). For type I, 11 patients underwent revisions with standard longer-stem prostheses (one with the original prosthesis), and one patient had the original prosthesis plus cortical allograft strut. For type II (a and b), 10 patients underwent revisions with original prosthesis or longer-stem prosthesis and 4 patients combined with cortical allograft strut. For type III, one patient underwent revision with a longer-stem prosthesis and the other 3 patients with a custom short-stem prosthesis. For type IV, only one patient underwent revision with a custom short-stem prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Aseptic loosening of the distal femoral prosthesis can be divided into 4 types: type I, type II (a, b), type III and type IV. The reconstruction methods of our centers for different types of bone defects can offer some reference value in the revision of aseptic loosening. BioMed Central 2022-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9608886/ /pubmed/36303200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05885-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hou, Zi-Wei
Xu, Ming
Zheng, Kai
Yu, Xiu-Chun
Classification and reconstruction of femoral bone defect in the revision of aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses: a 10-year multicenter retrospective analysis
title Classification and reconstruction of femoral bone defect in the revision of aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses: a 10-year multicenter retrospective analysis
title_full Classification and reconstruction of femoral bone defect in the revision of aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses: a 10-year multicenter retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Classification and reconstruction of femoral bone defect in the revision of aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses: a 10-year multicenter retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Classification and reconstruction of femoral bone defect in the revision of aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses: a 10-year multicenter retrospective analysis
title_short Classification and reconstruction of femoral bone defect in the revision of aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses: a 10-year multicenter retrospective analysis
title_sort classification and reconstruction of femoral bone defect in the revision of aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses: a 10-year multicenter retrospective analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9608886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36303200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05885-7
work_keys_str_mv AT houziwei classificationandreconstructionoffemoralbonedefectintherevisionofasepticlooseningofdistalfemoralendoprosthesesa10yearmulticenterretrospectiveanalysis
AT xuming classificationandreconstructionoffemoralbonedefectintherevisionofasepticlooseningofdistalfemoralendoprosthesesa10yearmulticenterretrospectiveanalysis
AT zhengkai classificationandreconstructionoffemoralbonedefectintherevisionofasepticlooseningofdistalfemoralendoprosthesesa10yearmulticenterretrospectiveanalysis
AT yuxiuchun classificationandreconstructionoffemoralbonedefectintherevisionofasepticlooseningofdistalfemoralendoprosthesesa10yearmulticenterretrospectiveanalysis