Cargando…

Study on the Differences between Various Gas Injection Sources in the Process of Coal Seam Methane Replacement by Gas Injection

[Image: see text] To study the differences between various gas injection sources in the process of coal seam methane replacement, experimental research was conducted to study the influences of different gas injection sources and gas injection ratios on coal seam methane replacement by considering th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Kan, Yang, Hongmin, Guan, Jinfeng, Si, Zhongying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9609068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36312420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c04395
_version_ 1784818925794492416
author Zhou, Kan
Yang, Hongmin
Guan, Jinfeng
Si, Zhongying
author_facet Zhou, Kan
Yang, Hongmin
Guan, Jinfeng
Si, Zhongying
author_sort Zhou, Kan
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] To study the differences between various gas injection sources in the process of coal seam methane replacement, experimental research was conducted to study the influences of different gas injection sources and gas injection ratios on coal seam methane replacement by considering the strong adsorption gas CO(2) and the weak adsorption gas N(2). The experimental results show that the temperature rise effect of the CO(2) injection gas is greater and lasts longer than that of the N(2) injection gas in the process of coal seam methane replacement by gas injection, and the temperature rise can promote the desorption of adsorbed methane well. However, due to the different effects of gas compressibility, the increase in gas pressure caused by injecting N(2) under the same conditions is higher than that of CO(2); due to the strong adsorption of CO(2), the gas pressure after injecting CO(2) continues to decrease slowly. From the displacement effect, the adsorbability of the injection source gas has a significant effect on the displacement rate and injection-placement ratio, while the injection ratio has a significant effect on CO(2) displacement but not on N(2) injection. From the experimental results, for N(2) injection, the effects of coal seam methane replacement by gas injection can be enhanced by improving the gas injection method and process; for CO(2) injection, the effects of coal seam methane replacement by gas injection can be improved by the following two aspects: gas injection volume and gas injection time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9609068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96090682022-10-28 Study on the Differences between Various Gas Injection Sources in the Process of Coal Seam Methane Replacement by Gas Injection Zhou, Kan Yang, Hongmin Guan, Jinfeng Si, Zhongying ACS Omega [Image: see text] To study the differences between various gas injection sources in the process of coal seam methane replacement, experimental research was conducted to study the influences of different gas injection sources and gas injection ratios on coal seam methane replacement by considering the strong adsorption gas CO(2) and the weak adsorption gas N(2). The experimental results show that the temperature rise effect of the CO(2) injection gas is greater and lasts longer than that of the N(2) injection gas in the process of coal seam methane replacement by gas injection, and the temperature rise can promote the desorption of adsorbed methane well. However, due to the different effects of gas compressibility, the increase in gas pressure caused by injecting N(2) under the same conditions is higher than that of CO(2); due to the strong adsorption of CO(2), the gas pressure after injecting CO(2) continues to decrease slowly. From the displacement effect, the adsorbability of the injection source gas has a significant effect on the displacement rate and injection-placement ratio, while the injection ratio has a significant effect on CO(2) displacement but not on N(2) injection. From the experimental results, for N(2) injection, the effects of coal seam methane replacement by gas injection can be enhanced by improving the gas injection method and process; for CO(2) injection, the effects of coal seam methane replacement by gas injection can be improved by the following two aspects: gas injection volume and gas injection time. American Chemical Society 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9609068/ /pubmed/36312420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c04395 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Zhou, Kan
Yang, Hongmin
Guan, Jinfeng
Si, Zhongying
Study on the Differences between Various Gas Injection Sources in the Process of Coal Seam Methane Replacement by Gas Injection
title Study on the Differences between Various Gas Injection Sources in the Process of Coal Seam Methane Replacement by Gas Injection
title_full Study on the Differences between Various Gas Injection Sources in the Process of Coal Seam Methane Replacement by Gas Injection
title_fullStr Study on the Differences between Various Gas Injection Sources in the Process of Coal Seam Methane Replacement by Gas Injection
title_full_unstemmed Study on the Differences between Various Gas Injection Sources in the Process of Coal Seam Methane Replacement by Gas Injection
title_short Study on the Differences between Various Gas Injection Sources in the Process of Coal Seam Methane Replacement by Gas Injection
title_sort study on the differences between various gas injection sources in the process of coal seam methane replacement by gas injection
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9609068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36312420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c04395
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoukan studyonthedifferencesbetweenvariousgasinjectionsourcesintheprocessofcoalseammethanereplacementbygasinjection
AT yanghongmin studyonthedifferencesbetweenvariousgasinjectionsourcesintheprocessofcoalseammethanereplacementbygasinjection
AT guanjinfeng studyonthedifferencesbetweenvariousgasinjectionsourcesintheprocessofcoalseammethanereplacementbygasinjection
AT sizhongying studyonthedifferencesbetweenvariousgasinjectionsourcesintheprocessofcoalseammethanereplacementbygasinjection