Cargando…

Hybrid approach for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: immediate versus staged treatment

BACKGROUND: The hybrid approach has become the most effective treatment option for restoring sinus rhythm and reducing the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. However, several issues remain to be clearly defined, including the appropriate timing of the staged procedure and the most effectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nasso, Giuseppe, Lorusso, Roberto, Di Bari, Nicola, Condello, Ignazio, Agró, Felice Eugenio, Fiore, Flavio, Bonifazi, Raffaele, Santarpino, Giuseppe, Speziale, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9609243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36289547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-02019-x
_version_ 1784818970796228608
author Nasso, Giuseppe
Lorusso, Roberto
Di Bari, Nicola
Condello, Ignazio
Agró, Felice Eugenio
Fiore, Flavio
Bonifazi, Raffaele
Santarpino, Giuseppe
Speziale, Giuseppe
author_facet Nasso, Giuseppe
Lorusso, Roberto
Di Bari, Nicola
Condello, Ignazio
Agró, Felice Eugenio
Fiore, Flavio
Bonifazi, Raffaele
Santarpino, Giuseppe
Speziale, Giuseppe
author_sort Nasso, Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The hybrid approach has become the most effective treatment option for restoring sinus rhythm and reducing the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. However, several issues remain to be clearly defined, including the appropriate timing of the staged procedure and the most effective strategy. METHODS: Over a 12-year period of activity, we performed 609 AF ablation procedures via a right mini-thoracotomy. From this general population, 60 patients underwent a hybrid procedure with catheter ablation performed at least 4 weeks after the surgical procedure to confirm if effective complete electrical isolation of pulmonary veins was achieved. In 20 patients, the second stage procedure was performed during the same hospitalization due to patient’s electrical instability. The results obtained in immediate versus staged patients were compared. RESULTS: All patients were discharged after the first stage procedure in sinus rhythm. The 20 immediate patients had a shorter hospital stay compared with the staged patients, in whom the two hospitalizations resulted in a longer hospital stay (immediate 5.5 ± 1.6 days versus staged 8.7 ± 1.4, P < 0.001). A significantly higher number of immediate patients had an associated ablation of the Bachmann’s bundle (n = 16 in the immediate group [80%] versus n = 14 in the staged group [45%]; P = 0.001). After a mean follow-up of 74 months, there was no significant difference in the risk of AF relapse between groups (immediate 1/20 [5%] versus staged 7/40 [17.5%]; P = 0.18). CONCLUSION: The hybrid approach for the treatment of AF was safe and effective in immediate restoring sinus rhythm and in its maintenance at follow-up. Our preliminary results show that both immediate and staged procedures show similar efficacy but this result is strongly influenced by the concomitant ablation of the Bachmann’s bundle, which appears to be the most important component of the treatment strategy in order to reduce the risk of recurrent AF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9609243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96092432022-10-28 Hybrid approach for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: immediate versus staged treatment Nasso, Giuseppe Lorusso, Roberto Di Bari, Nicola Condello, Ignazio Agró, Felice Eugenio Fiore, Flavio Bonifazi, Raffaele Santarpino, Giuseppe Speziale, Giuseppe J Cardiothorac Surg Research BACKGROUND: The hybrid approach has become the most effective treatment option for restoring sinus rhythm and reducing the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. However, several issues remain to be clearly defined, including the appropriate timing of the staged procedure and the most effective strategy. METHODS: Over a 12-year period of activity, we performed 609 AF ablation procedures via a right mini-thoracotomy. From this general population, 60 patients underwent a hybrid procedure with catheter ablation performed at least 4 weeks after the surgical procedure to confirm if effective complete electrical isolation of pulmonary veins was achieved. In 20 patients, the second stage procedure was performed during the same hospitalization due to patient’s electrical instability. The results obtained in immediate versus staged patients were compared. RESULTS: All patients were discharged after the first stage procedure in sinus rhythm. The 20 immediate patients had a shorter hospital stay compared with the staged patients, in whom the two hospitalizations resulted in a longer hospital stay (immediate 5.5 ± 1.6 days versus staged 8.7 ± 1.4, P < 0.001). A significantly higher number of immediate patients had an associated ablation of the Bachmann’s bundle (n = 16 in the immediate group [80%] versus n = 14 in the staged group [45%]; P = 0.001). After a mean follow-up of 74 months, there was no significant difference in the risk of AF relapse between groups (immediate 1/20 [5%] versus staged 7/40 [17.5%]; P = 0.18). CONCLUSION: The hybrid approach for the treatment of AF was safe and effective in immediate restoring sinus rhythm and in its maintenance at follow-up. Our preliminary results show that both immediate and staged procedures show similar efficacy but this result is strongly influenced by the concomitant ablation of the Bachmann’s bundle, which appears to be the most important component of the treatment strategy in order to reduce the risk of recurrent AF. BioMed Central 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9609243/ /pubmed/36289547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-02019-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Nasso, Giuseppe
Lorusso, Roberto
Di Bari, Nicola
Condello, Ignazio
Agró, Felice Eugenio
Fiore, Flavio
Bonifazi, Raffaele
Santarpino, Giuseppe
Speziale, Giuseppe
Hybrid approach for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: immediate versus staged treatment
title Hybrid approach for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: immediate versus staged treatment
title_full Hybrid approach for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: immediate versus staged treatment
title_fullStr Hybrid approach for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: immediate versus staged treatment
title_full_unstemmed Hybrid approach for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: immediate versus staged treatment
title_short Hybrid approach for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: immediate versus staged treatment
title_sort hybrid approach for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: immediate versus staged treatment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9609243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36289547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-02019-x
work_keys_str_mv AT nassogiuseppe hybridapproachforlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationimmediateversusstagedtreatment
AT lorussoroberto hybridapproachforlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationimmediateversusstagedtreatment
AT dibarinicola hybridapproachforlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationimmediateversusstagedtreatment
AT condelloignazio hybridapproachforlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationimmediateversusstagedtreatment
AT agrofeliceeugenio hybridapproachforlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationimmediateversusstagedtreatment
AT fioreflavio hybridapproachforlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationimmediateversusstagedtreatment
AT bonifaziraffaele hybridapproachforlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationimmediateversusstagedtreatment
AT santarpinogiuseppe hybridapproachforlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationimmediateversusstagedtreatment
AT spezialegiuseppe hybridapproachforlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationimmediateversusstagedtreatment