Cargando…
Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Aneuploidies in Singleton Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines
Sophisticated screening protocols for genetic abnormalities constitute an important component of current prenatal care, aiming to identify high-risk pregnancies and offer appropriate counseling to parents regarding their options. Definite prenatal diagnosis is only possible by invasive prenatal diag...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9609299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36295632 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101472 |
_version_ | 1784818984164524032 |
---|---|
author | Giovannopoulou, Eirini Tsakiridis, Ioannis Mamopoulos, Apostolos Kalogiannidis, Ioannis Papoulidis, Ioannis Athanasiadis, Apostolos Dagklis, Themistoklis |
author_facet | Giovannopoulou, Eirini Tsakiridis, Ioannis Mamopoulos, Apostolos Kalogiannidis, Ioannis Papoulidis, Ioannis Athanasiadis, Apostolos Dagklis, Themistoklis |
author_sort | Giovannopoulou, Eirini |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sophisticated screening protocols for genetic abnormalities constitute an important component of current prenatal care, aiming to identify high-risk pregnancies and offer appropriate counseling to parents regarding their options. Definite prenatal diagnosis is only possible by invasive prenatal diagnostic testing (IPDT), mainly including amniocentesis and chorionic villous sampling (CVS). The aim of this comparative review was to summarize and compare the existing recommendations on IPDT from the most influential guidelines. All the reviewed guidelines highlight that IPDT is indicated based on a positive screening test rather than maternal age alone. Other indications arise from medical history and sonography, with significant variations identified between the guidelines. The earlier time for amniocentesis is unequivocally set at ≥15 gestational weeks, whereas for CVS, the earlier limit varies from ≥10 to ≥11 weeks. Certain technical aspects and the overall approach demonstrate significant differences. Periprocedural management regarding Rhesus alloimmunization, virologic status and use of anesthesia or antibiotics are either inconsistent or insufficiently addressed. The synthesis of an evidence-based algorithm for IPDT is of crucial importance to healthcare professionals implicated in prenatal care to avoid unnecessary interventions without compromising optimal prenatal care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9609299 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96092992022-10-28 Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Aneuploidies in Singleton Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines Giovannopoulou, Eirini Tsakiridis, Ioannis Mamopoulos, Apostolos Kalogiannidis, Ioannis Papoulidis, Ioannis Athanasiadis, Apostolos Dagklis, Themistoklis Medicina (Kaunas) Review Sophisticated screening protocols for genetic abnormalities constitute an important component of current prenatal care, aiming to identify high-risk pregnancies and offer appropriate counseling to parents regarding their options. Definite prenatal diagnosis is only possible by invasive prenatal diagnostic testing (IPDT), mainly including amniocentesis and chorionic villous sampling (CVS). The aim of this comparative review was to summarize and compare the existing recommendations on IPDT from the most influential guidelines. All the reviewed guidelines highlight that IPDT is indicated based on a positive screening test rather than maternal age alone. Other indications arise from medical history and sonography, with significant variations identified between the guidelines. The earlier time for amniocentesis is unequivocally set at ≥15 gestational weeks, whereas for CVS, the earlier limit varies from ≥10 to ≥11 weeks. Certain technical aspects and the overall approach demonstrate significant differences. Periprocedural management regarding Rhesus alloimmunization, virologic status and use of anesthesia or antibiotics are either inconsistent or insufficiently addressed. The synthesis of an evidence-based algorithm for IPDT is of crucial importance to healthcare professionals implicated in prenatal care to avoid unnecessary interventions without compromising optimal prenatal care. MDPI 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9609299/ /pubmed/36295632 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101472 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Giovannopoulou, Eirini Tsakiridis, Ioannis Mamopoulos, Apostolos Kalogiannidis, Ioannis Papoulidis, Ioannis Athanasiadis, Apostolos Dagklis, Themistoklis Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Aneuploidies in Singleton Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines |
title | Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Aneuploidies in Singleton Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines |
title_full | Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Aneuploidies in Singleton Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines |
title_fullStr | Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Aneuploidies in Singleton Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Aneuploidies in Singleton Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines |
title_short | Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Aneuploidies in Singleton Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines |
title_sort | invasive prenatal diagnostic testing for aneuploidies in singleton pregnancies: a comparative review of major guidelines |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9609299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36295632 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101472 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giovannopouloueirini invasiveprenataldiagnostictestingforaneuploidiesinsingletonpregnanciesacomparativereviewofmajorguidelines AT tsakiridisioannis invasiveprenataldiagnostictestingforaneuploidiesinsingletonpregnanciesacomparativereviewofmajorguidelines AT mamopoulosapostolos invasiveprenataldiagnostictestingforaneuploidiesinsingletonpregnanciesacomparativereviewofmajorguidelines AT kalogiannidisioannis invasiveprenataldiagnostictestingforaneuploidiesinsingletonpregnanciesacomparativereviewofmajorguidelines AT papoulidisioannis invasiveprenataldiagnostictestingforaneuploidiesinsingletonpregnanciesacomparativereviewofmajorguidelines AT athanasiadisapostolos invasiveprenataldiagnostictestingforaneuploidiesinsingletonpregnanciesacomparativereviewofmajorguidelines AT dagklisthemistoklis invasiveprenataldiagnostictestingforaneuploidiesinsingletonpregnanciesacomparativereviewofmajorguidelines |