Cargando…

Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Aneuploidies in Singleton Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines

Sophisticated screening protocols for genetic abnormalities constitute an important component of current prenatal care, aiming to identify high-risk pregnancies and offer appropriate counseling to parents regarding their options. Definite prenatal diagnosis is only possible by invasive prenatal diag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giovannopoulou, Eirini, Tsakiridis, Ioannis, Mamopoulos, Apostolos, Kalogiannidis, Ioannis, Papoulidis, Ioannis, Athanasiadis, Apostolos, Dagklis, Themistoklis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9609299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36295632
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101472
_version_ 1784818984164524032
author Giovannopoulou, Eirini
Tsakiridis, Ioannis
Mamopoulos, Apostolos
Kalogiannidis, Ioannis
Papoulidis, Ioannis
Athanasiadis, Apostolos
Dagklis, Themistoklis
author_facet Giovannopoulou, Eirini
Tsakiridis, Ioannis
Mamopoulos, Apostolos
Kalogiannidis, Ioannis
Papoulidis, Ioannis
Athanasiadis, Apostolos
Dagklis, Themistoklis
author_sort Giovannopoulou, Eirini
collection PubMed
description Sophisticated screening protocols for genetic abnormalities constitute an important component of current prenatal care, aiming to identify high-risk pregnancies and offer appropriate counseling to parents regarding their options. Definite prenatal diagnosis is only possible by invasive prenatal diagnostic testing (IPDT), mainly including amniocentesis and chorionic villous sampling (CVS). The aim of this comparative review was to summarize and compare the existing recommendations on IPDT from the most influential guidelines. All the reviewed guidelines highlight that IPDT is indicated based on a positive screening test rather than maternal age alone. Other indications arise from medical history and sonography, with significant variations identified between the guidelines. The earlier time for amniocentesis is unequivocally set at ≥15 gestational weeks, whereas for CVS, the earlier limit varies from ≥10 to ≥11 weeks. Certain technical aspects and the overall approach demonstrate significant differences. Periprocedural management regarding Rhesus alloimmunization, virologic status and use of anesthesia or antibiotics are either inconsistent or insufficiently addressed. The synthesis of an evidence-based algorithm for IPDT is of crucial importance to healthcare professionals implicated in prenatal care to avoid unnecessary interventions without compromising optimal prenatal care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9609299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96092992022-10-28 Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Aneuploidies in Singleton Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines Giovannopoulou, Eirini Tsakiridis, Ioannis Mamopoulos, Apostolos Kalogiannidis, Ioannis Papoulidis, Ioannis Athanasiadis, Apostolos Dagklis, Themistoklis Medicina (Kaunas) Review Sophisticated screening protocols for genetic abnormalities constitute an important component of current prenatal care, aiming to identify high-risk pregnancies and offer appropriate counseling to parents regarding their options. Definite prenatal diagnosis is only possible by invasive prenatal diagnostic testing (IPDT), mainly including amniocentesis and chorionic villous sampling (CVS). The aim of this comparative review was to summarize and compare the existing recommendations on IPDT from the most influential guidelines. All the reviewed guidelines highlight that IPDT is indicated based on a positive screening test rather than maternal age alone. Other indications arise from medical history and sonography, with significant variations identified between the guidelines. The earlier time for amniocentesis is unequivocally set at ≥15 gestational weeks, whereas for CVS, the earlier limit varies from ≥10 to ≥11 weeks. Certain technical aspects and the overall approach demonstrate significant differences. Periprocedural management regarding Rhesus alloimmunization, virologic status and use of anesthesia or antibiotics are either inconsistent or insufficiently addressed. The synthesis of an evidence-based algorithm for IPDT is of crucial importance to healthcare professionals implicated in prenatal care to avoid unnecessary interventions without compromising optimal prenatal care. MDPI 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9609299/ /pubmed/36295632 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101472 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Giovannopoulou, Eirini
Tsakiridis, Ioannis
Mamopoulos, Apostolos
Kalogiannidis, Ioannis
Papoulidis, Ioannis
Athanasiadis, Apostolos
Dagklis, Themistoklis
Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Aneuploidies in Singleton Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines
title Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Aneuploidies in Singleton Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines
title_full Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Aneuploidies in Singleton Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines
title_fullStr Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Aneuploidies in Singleton Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Aneuploidies in Singleton Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines
title_short Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Aneuploidies in Singleton Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines
title_sort invasive prenatal diagnostic testing for aneuploidies in singleton pregnancies: a comparative review of major guidelines
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9609299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36295632
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101472
work_keys_str_mv AT giovannopouloueirini invasiveprenataldiagnostictestingforaneuploidiesinsingletonpregnanciesacomparativereviewofmajorguidelines
AT tsakiridisioannis invasiveprenataldiagnostictestingforaneuploidiesinsingletonpregnanciesacomparativereviewofmajorguidelines
AT mamopoulosapostolos invasiveprenataldiagnostictestingforaneuploidiesinsingletonpregnanciesacomparativereviewofmajorguidelines
AT kalogiannidisioannis invasiveprenataldiagnostictestingforaneuploidiesinsingletonpregnanciesacomparativereviewofmajorguidelines
AT papoulidisioannis invasiveprenataldiagnostictestingforaneuploidiesinsingletonpregnanciesacomparativereviewofmajorguidelines
AT athanasiadisapostolos invasiveprenataldiagnostictestingforaneuploidiesinsingletonpregnanciesacomparativereviewofmajorguidelines
AT dagklisthemistoklis invasiveprenataldiagnostictestingforaneuploidiesinsingletonpregnanciesacomparativereviewofmajorguidelines