Cargando…

Surgical Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity: Anticipated Sagittal Alignment Corrections According to the Surgical Level

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Establish simultaneous focal and regional corrective guidelines accounting for reciprocal global and pelvic compensation. METHODS: 433 ASD patients (mean age 62.9 yrs, 81.3% F) who underwent corrective realignment (minimum L1-pelvis) were include...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lafage, Renaud, Schwab, Frank, Elysee, Jonathan, Smith, Justin S., Alshabab, Basel Sheikh, Passias, Peter, Klineberg, Eric, Kim, Han Jo, Shaffrey, Christopher, Burton, Douglas, Gupta, Munish, Mundis, Gregory M., Ames, Christopher, Bess, Shay, Lafage, Virginie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9609531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33567927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220988504
_version_ 1784819044181868544
author Lafage, Renaud
Schwab, Frank
Elysee, Jonathan
Smith, Justin S.
Alshabab, Basel Sheikh
Passias, Peter
Klineberg, Eric
Kim, Han Jo
Shaffrey, Christopher
Burton, Douglas
Gupta, Munish
Mundis, Gregory M.
Ames, Christopher
Bess, Shay
Lafage, Virginie
author_facet Lafage, Renaud
Schwab, Frank
Elysee, Jonathan
Smith, Justin S.
Alshabab, Basel Sheikh
Passias, Peter
Klineberg, Eric
Kim, Han Jo
Shaffrey, Christopher
Burton, Douglas
Gupta, Munish
Mundis, Gregory M.
Ames, Christopher
Bess, Shay
Lafage, Virginie
author_sort Lafage, Renaud
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Establish simultaneous focal and regional corrective guidelines accounting for reciprocal global and pelvic compensation. METHODS: 433 ASD patients (mean age 62.9 yrs, 81.3% F) who underwent corrective realignment (minimum L1-pelvis) were included. Sagittal parameters, and segmental and regional Cobb angles were assessed pre and post-op. Virtual postoperative alignment was generated by combining post-op alignment of the fused spine with the pre-op alignment on the unfused thoracic kyphosis and the pre-op pelvic retroversion. Regression models were then generated to predict the relative impact of segmental (L4-L5) and regional (L1-L4) corrections on PT, SVA (virtual), and TPA. RESULTS: Baseline analysis revealed distal (L4-S1) lordosis of 33 ± 15°, flat proximal (L1-L4) lordosis (1.7 ± 17°), and segmental kyphosis from L2-L3 to T10-T11. Post-op, there was no mean change in distal lordosis (L5-S1 decreased by 2°, and L4-L5 increased by 2°), while the more proximal lordosis increased by 18 ± 16°. Regression formulas revealed that Δ10° in distal lordosis resulted in Δ10° in TPA, associated with Δ100 mm in SVA or Δ3° in PT; Δ10° in proximal lordosis yielded Δ5° in TPA associated with Δ50 mm in SVA; and finally Δ10° in thoraco-lumbar junction yielded Δ2.5° in TPA associated with Δ25 mm in SVA and no impact on PT correction. CONCLUSIONS: Overall impact of lumbar lordosis restoration is critically determined by location of correction. Distal correction leads to a greater impact on global alignment and pelvic retroversion. More specifically, it can be assumed that 1° L4-S1 lordosis correction produces 1° change in TPA / 10 mm change in SVA and 0.5° in PT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9609531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96095312022-10-28 Surgical Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity: Anticipated Sagittal Alignment Corrections According to the Surgical Level Lafage, Renaud Schwab, Frank Elysee, Jonathan Smith, Justin S. Alshabab, Basel Sheikh Passias, Peter Klineberg, Eric Kim, Han Jo Shaffrey, Christopher Burton, Douglas Gupta, Munish Mundis, Gregory M. Ames, Christopher Bess, Shay Lafage, Virginie Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Establish simultaneous focal and regional corrective guidelines accounting for reciprocal global and pelvic compensation. METHODS: 433 ASD patients (mean age 62.9 yrs, 81.3% F) who underwent corrective realignment (minimum L1-pelvis) were included. Sagittal parameters, and segmental and regional Cobb angles were assessed pre and post-op. Virtual postoperative alignment was generated by combining post-op alignment of the fused spine with the pre-op alignment on the unfused thoracic kyphosis and the pre-op pelvic retroversion. Regression models were then generated to predict the relative impact of segmental (L4-L5) and regional (L1-L4) corrections on PT, SVA (virtual), and TPA. RESULTS: Baseline analysis revealed distal (L4-S1) lordosis of 33 ± 15°, flat proximal (L1-L4) lordosis (1.7 ± 17°), and segmental kyphosis from L2-L3 to T10-T11. Post-op, there was no mean change in distal lordosis (L5-S1 decreased by 2°, and L4-L5 increased by 2°), while the more proximal lordosis increased by 18 ± 16°. Regression formulas revealed that Δ10° in distal lordosis resulted in Δ10° in TPA, associated with Δ100 mm in SVA or Δ3° in PT; Δ10° in proximal lordosis yielded Δ5° in TPA associated with Δ50 mm in SVA; and finally Δ10° in thoraco-lumbar junction yielded Δ2.5° in TPA associated with Δ25 mm in SVA and no impact on PT correction. CONCLUSIONS: Overall impact of lumbar lordosis restoration is critically determined by location of correction. Distal correction leads to a greater impact on global alignment and pelvic retroversion. More specifically, it can be assumed that 1° L4-S1 lordosis correction produces 1° change in TPA / 10 mm change in SVA and 0.5° in PT. SAGE Publications 2021-02-11 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9609531/ /pubmed/33567927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220988504 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Lafage, Renaud
Schwab, Frank
Elysee, Jonathan
Smith, Justin S.
Alshabab, Basel Sheikh
Passias, Peter
Klineberg, Eric
Kim, Han Jo
Shaffrey, Christopher
Burton, Douglas
Gupta, Munish
Mundis, Gregory M.
Ames, Christopher
Bess, Shay
Lafage, Virginie
Surgical Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity: Anticipated Sagittal Alignment Corrections According to the Surgical Level
title Surgical Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity: Anticipated Sagittal Alignment Corrections According to the Surgical Level
title_full Surgical Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity: Anticipated Sagittal Alignment Corrections According to the Surgical Level
title_fullStr Surgical Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity: Anticipated Sagittal Alignment Corrections According to the Surgical Level
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity: Anticipated Sagittal Alignment Corrections According to the Surgical Level
title_short Surgical Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity: Anticipated Sagittal Alignment Corrections According to the Surgical Level
title_sort surgical planning for adult spinal deformity: anticipated sagittal alignment corrections according to the surgical level
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9609531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33567927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220988504
work_keys_str_mv AT lafagerenaud surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel
AT schwabfrank surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel
AT elyseejonathan surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel
AT smithjustins surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel
AT alshababbaselsheikh surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel
AT passiaspeter surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel
AT klinebergeric surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel
AT kimhanjo surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel
AT shaffreychristopher surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel
AT burtondouglas surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel
AT guptamunish surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel
AT mundisgregorym surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel
AT ameschristopher surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel
AT bessshay surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel
AT lafagevirginie surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel
AT surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel