Cargando…
Surgical Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity: Anticipated Sagittal Alignment Corrections According to the Surgical Level
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Establish simultaneous focal and regional corrective guidelines accounting for reciprocal global and pelvic compensation. METHODS: 433 ASD patients (mean age 62.9 yrs, 81.3% F) who underwent corrective realignment (minimum L1-pelvis) were include...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9609531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33567927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220988504 |
_version_ | 1784819044181868544 |
---|---|
author | Lafage, Renaud Schwab, Frank Elysee, Jonathan Smith, Justin S. Alshabab, Basel Sheikh Passias, Peter Klineberg, Eric Kim, Han Jo Shaffrey, Christopher Burton, Douglas Gupta, Munish Mundis, Gregory M. Ames, Christopher Bess, Shay Lafage, Virginie |
author_facet | Lafage, Renaud Schwab, Frank Elysee, Jonathan Smith, Justin S. Alshabab, Basel Sheikh Passias, Peter Klineberg, Eric Kim, Han Jo Shaffrey, Christopher Burton, Douglas Gupta, Munish Mundis, Gregory M. Ames, Christopher Bess, Shay Lafage, Virginie |
author_sort | Lafage, Renaud |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Establish simultaneous focal and regional corrective guidelines accounting for reciprocal global and pelvic compensation. METHODS: 433 ASD patients (mean age 62.9 yrs, 81.3% F) who underwent corrective realignment (minimum L1-pelvis) were included. Sagittal parameters, and segmental and regional Cobb angles were assessed pre and post-op. Virtual postoperative alignment was generated by combining post-op alignment of the fused spine with the pre-op alignment on the unfused thoracic kyphosis and the pre-op pelvic retroversion. Regression models were then generated to predict the relative impact of segmental (L4-L5) and regional (L1-L4) corrections on PT, SVA (virtual), and TPA. RESULTS: Baseline analysis revealed distal (L4-S1) lordosis of 33 ± 15°, flat proximal (L1-L4) lordosis (1.7 ± 17°), and segmental kyphosis from L2-L3 to T10-T11. Post-op, there was no mean change in distal lordosis (L5-S1 decreased by 2°, and L4-L5 increased by 2°), while the more proximal lordosis increased by 18 ± 16°. Regression formulas revealed that Δ10° in distal lordosis resulted in Δ10° in TPA, associated with Δ100 mm in SVA or Δ3° in PT; Δ10° in proximal lordosis yielded Δ5° in TPA associated with Δ50 mm in SVA; and finally Δ10° in thoraco-lumbar junction yielded Δ2.5° in TPA associated with Δ25 mm in SVA and no impact on PT correction. CONCLUSIONS: Overall impact of lumbar lordosis restoration is critically determined by location of correction. Distal correction leads to a greater impact on global alignment and pelvic retroversion. More specifically, it can be assumed that 1° L4-S1 lordosis correction produces 1° change in TPA / 10 mm change in SVA and 0.5° in PT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9609531 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96095312022-10-28 Surgical Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity: Anticipated Sagittal Alignment Corrections According to the Surgical Level Lafage, Renaud Schwab, Frank Elysee, Jonathan Smith, Justin S. Alshabab, Basel Sheikh Passias, Peter Klineberg, Eric Kim, Han Jo Shaffrey, Christopher Burton, Douglas Gupta, Munish Mundis, Gregory M. Ames, Christopher Bess, Shay Lafage, Virginie Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Establish simultaneous focal and regional corrective guidelines accounting for reciprocal global and pelvic compensation. METHODS: 433 ASD patients (mean age 62.9 yrs, 81.3% F) who underwent corrective realignment (minimum L1-pelvis) were included. Sagittal parameters, and segmental and regional Cobb angles were assessed pre and post-op. Virtual postoperative alignment was generated by combining post-op alignment of the fused spine with the pre-op alignment on the unfused thoracic kyphosis and the pre-op pelvic retroversion. Regression models were then generated to predict the relative impact of segmental (L4-L5) and regional (L1-L4) corrections on PT, SVA (virtual), and TPA. RESULTS: Baseline analysis revealed distal (L4-S1) lordosis of 33 ± 15°, flat proximal (L1-L4) lordosis (1.7 ± 17°), and segmental kyphosis from L2-L3 to T10-T11. Post-op, there was no mean change in distal lordosis (L5-S1 decreased by 2°, and L4-L5 increased by 2°), while the more proximal lordosis increased by 18 ± 16°. Regression formulas revealed that Δ10° in distal lordosis resulted in Δ10° in TPA, associated with Δ100 mm in SVA or Δ3° in PT; Δ10° in proximal lordosis yielded Δ5° in TPA associated with Δ50 mm in SVA; and finally Δ10° in thoraco-lumbar junction yielded Δ2.5° in TPA associated with Δ25 mm in SVA and no impact on PT correction. CONCLUSIONS: Overall impact of lumbar lordosis restoration is critically determined by location of correction. Distal correction leads to a greater impact on global alignment and pelvic retroversion. More specifically, it can be assumed that 1° L4-S1 lordosis correction produces 1° change in TPA / 10 mm change in SVA and 0.5° in PT. SAGE Publications 2021-02-11 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9609531/ /pubmed/33567927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220988504 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Lafage, Renaud Schwab, Frank Elysee, Jonathan Smith, Justin S. Alshabab, Basel Sheikh Passias, Peter Klineberg, Eric Kim, Han Jo Shaffrey, Christopher Burton, Douglas Gupta, Munish Mundis, Gregory M. Ames, Christopher Bess, Shay Lafage, Virginie Surgical Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity: Anticipated Sagittal Alignment Corrections According to the Surgical Level |
title | Surgical Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity: Anticipated Sagittal
Alignment Corrections According to the Surgical Level |
title_full | Surgical Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity: Anticipated Sagittal
Alignment Corrections According to the Surgical Level |
title_fullStr | Surgical Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity: Anticipated Sagittal
Alignment Corrections According to the Surgical Level |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity: Anticipated Sagittal
Alignment Corrections According to the Surgical Level |
title_short | Surgical Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity: Anticipated Sagittal
Alignment Corrections According to the Surgical Level |
title_sort | surgical planning for adult spinal deformity: anticipated sagittal
alignment corrections according to the surgical level |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9609531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33567927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220988504 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lafagerenaud surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel AT schwabfrank surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel AT elyseejonathan surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel AT smithjustins surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel AT alshababbaselsheikh surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel AT passiaspeter surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel AT klinebergeric surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel AT kimhanjo surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel AT shaffreychristopher surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel AT burtondouglas surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel AT guptamunish surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel AT mundisgregorym surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel AT ameschristopher surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel AT bessshay surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel AT lafagevirginie surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel AT surgicalplanningforadultspinaldeformityanticipatedsagittalalignmentcorrectionsaccordingtothesurgicallevel |