Cargando…

Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Challenges, Progress, and Strategies

Lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) represent a promising next-generation energy storage system, with advantages such as high specific capacity (1675 mAh g(−1)), abundant resources, low price, and ecological friendliness. During the application of liquid electrolytes, the flammability of organic electro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Qiancheng, Ye, Chun, Mao, Deyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9609870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36296802
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12203612
_version_ 1784819128643616768
author Zhu, Qiancheng
Ye, Chun
Mao, Deyu
author_facet Zhu, Qiancheng
Ye, Chun
Mao, Deyu
author_sort Zhu, Qiancheng
collection PubMed
description Lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) represent a promising next-generation energy storage system, with advantages such as high specific capacity (1675 mAh g(−1)), abundant resources, low price, and ecological friendliness. During the application of liquid electrolytes, the flammability of organic electrolytes, and the dissolution/shuttle of polysulfide seriously damage the safety and the cycle life of lithium–sulfur batteries. Replacing a liquid electrolyte with a solid one is a good solution, while the higher mechanical strength of solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) has an inhibitory effect on the growth of lithium dendrites. However, the lower ionic conductivity, poor interfacial contact, and relatively narrow electrochemical window of solid-state electrolytes limit the commercialization of solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries (SSLSBs). This review describes the research progress in LSBs and the challenges faced by SSEs, which are classified as polymer electrolytes, inorganic solid electrolytes, and composite electrolytes. The advantages, as well as the disadvantages of various types of electrolytes, the common coping strategies to improve performance, and future development trends, are systematically described.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9609870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96098702022-10-28 Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Challenges, Progress, and Strategies Zhu, Qiancheng Ye, Chun Mao, Deyu Nanomaterials (Basel) Review Lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) represent a promising next-generation energy storage system, with advantages such as high specific capacity (1675 mAh g(−1)), abundant resources, low price, and ecological friendliness. During the application of liquid electrolytes, the flammability of organic electrolytes, and the dissolution/shuttle of polysulfide seriously damage the safety and the cycle life of lithium–sulfur batteries. Replacing a liquid electrolyte with a solid one is a good solution, while the higher mechanical strength of solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) has an inhibitory effect on the growth of lithium dendrites. However, the lower ionic conductivity, poor interfacial contact, and relatively narrow electrochemical window of solid-state electrolytes limit the commercialization of solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries (SSLSBs). This review describes the research progress in LSBs and the challenges faced by SSEs, which are classified as polymer electrolytes, inorganic solid electrolytes, and composite electrolytes. The advantages, as well as the disadvantages of various types of electrolytes, the common coping strategies to improve performance, and future development trends, are systematically described. MDPI 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9609870/ /pubmed/36296802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12203612 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Zhu, Qiancheng
Ye, Chun
Mao, Deyu
Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Challenges, Progress, and Strategies
title Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Challenges, Progress, and Strategies
title_full Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Challenges, Progress, and Strategies
title_fullStr Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Challenges, Progress, and Strategies
title_full_unstemmed Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Challenges, Progress, and Strategies
title_short Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Challenges, Progress, and Strategies
title_sort solid-state electrolytes for lithium–sulfur batteries: challenges, progress, and strategies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9609870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36296802
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12203612
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuqiancheng solidstateelectrolytesforlithiumsulfurbatterieschallengesprogressandstrategies
AT yechun solidstateelectrolytesforlithiumsulfurbatterieschallengesprogressandstrategies
AT maodeyu solidstateelectrolytesforlithiumsulfurbatterieschallengesprogressandstrategies