Cargando…
Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Challenges, Progress, and Strategies
Lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) represent a promising next-generation energy storage system, with advantages such as high specific capacity (1675 mAh g(−1)), abundant resources, low price, and ecological friendliness. During the application of liquid electrolytes, the flammability of organic electro...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9609870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36296802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12203612 |
_version_ | 1784819128643616768 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Qiancheng Ye, Chun Mao, Deyu |
author_facet | Zhu, Qiancheng Ye, Chun Mao, Deyu |
author_sort | Zhu, Qiancheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) represent a promising next-generation energy storage system, with advantages such as high specific capacity (1675 mAh g(−1)), abundant resources, low price, and ecological friendliness. During the application of liquid electrolytes, the flammability of organic electrolytes, and the dissolution/shuttle of polysulfide seriously damage the safety and the cycle life of lithium–sulfur batteries. Replacing a liquid electrolyte with a solid one is a good solution, while the higher mechanical strength of solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) has an inhibitory effect on the growth of lithium dendrites. However, the lower ionic conductivity, poor interfacial contact, and relatively narrow electrochemical window of solid-state electrolytes limit the commercialization of solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries (SSLSBs). This review describes the research progress in LSBs and the challenges faced by SSEs, which are classified as polymer electrolytes, inorganic solid electrolytes, and composite electrolytes. The advantages, as well as the disadvantages of various types of electrolytes, the common coping strategies to improve performance, and future development trends, are systematically described. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9609870 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96098702022-10-28 Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Challenges, Progress, and Strategies Zhu, Qiancheng Ye, Chun Mao, Deyu Nanomaterials (Basel) Review Lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) represent a promising next-generation energy storage system, with advantages such as high specific capacity (1675 mAh g(−1)), abundant resources, low price, and ecological friendliness. During the application of liquid electrolytes, the flammability of organic electrolytes, and the dissolution/shuttle of polysulfide seriously damage the safety and the cycle life of lithium–sulfur batteries. Replacing a liquid electrolyte with a solid one is a good solution, while the higher mechanical strength of solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) has an inhibitory effect on the growth of lithium dendrites. However, the lower ionic conductivity, poor interfacial contact, and relatively narrow electrochemical window of solid-state electrolytes limit the commercialization of solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries (SSLSBs). This review describes the research progress in LSBs and the challenges faced by SSEs, which are classified as polymer electrolytes, inorganic solid electrolytes, and composite electrolytes. The advantages, as well as the disadvantages of various types of electrolytes, the common coping strategies to improve performance, and future development trends, are systematically described. MDPI 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9609870/ /pubmed/36296802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12203612 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Zhu, Qiancheng Ye, Chun Mao, Deyu Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Challenges, Progress, and Strategies |
title | Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Challenges, Progress, and Strategies |
title_full | Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Challenges, Progress, and Strategies |
title_fullStr | Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Challenges, Progress, and Strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Challenges, Progress, and Strategies |
title_short | Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Challenges, Progress, and Strategies |
title_sort | solid-state electrolytes for lithium–sulfur batteries: challenges, progress, and strategies |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9609870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36296802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12203612 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhuqiancheng solidstateelectrolytesforlithiumsulfurbatterieschallengesprogressandstrategies AT yechun solidstateelectrolytesforlithiumsulfurbatterieschallengesprogressandstrategies AT maodeyu solidstateelectrolytesforlithiumsulfurbatterieschallengesprogressandstrategies |