Cargando…
Membrane BioReactor (MBR) Activated Sludge Surrogate Alternatives Carboxymethyl Cellulose and Xanthan Gum: A Statistical Analysis and Review
Membrane Bioreactors (MBR) combine traditional biological treatments such as Activated Sludge (AS) with a membrane-based filtration process to extract suspended and organic solids. MBR operation involves high shear rates near the membrane surface due to the high crossflow velocity, which complicates...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9610177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36295668 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12100909 |
Sumario: | Membrane Bioreactors (MBR) combine traditional biological treatments such as Activated Sludge (AS) with a membrane-based filtration process to extract suspended and organic solids. MBR operation involves high shear rates near the membrane surface due to the high crossflow velocity, which complicates any simulation process from a hydrodynamic point of view. In this regard, the viscosity as a function of total suspended solids (TSS) plays an essential role in characterizing and modeling the behavior of activated sludge (AS). However, AS has an intransparency property that prevents experimental measurements (i.e., velocity profiles) commonly associated with optical techniques from being peformed. In light of this limitation, two polymeric compounds, carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and xanthan gum (XG), are considered here in order to explore the possibility of mimicking the rheological behavior of AS. These compounds are commonly used in the food industry as food thickeners, and their rheological behavior is supposedly well defined in the literature. In this work, we reviewed the viscosity behavior of these compounds through their reported flow behavior and consistency indexes. It was found that the rheological properties of these two polymers differ depending on the chemical manufacturer, rheometers, and measurement protocols involved. Different curves (shear rate vs. viscosity/shear stress) are obtained, as each device and procedure seem to modify the polymer structure. Therefore, a statistical analysis was performed based on the flow and consistency indexes using different concentrations and temperatures reported in experimental data. Several insights regarding CMC, XG, and AS performance were obtained, including a better relationship with concentration than with temperature or certain exponential-based performances, which can support further MBR design and operational decision-making. |
---|