Cargando…

Sinking skin syndrome in a decompressive craniectomy series: Clinical and radiological features

BACKGROUND: The sinking skin syndrome (SSS) is a particular complication after a decompressive craniectomy (DC). It still remains a poorly understood and underestimated entity. METHODS: Retrospective case series of craniectomized patients with and without SSS. Clinical and radiological features (DC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santander, Xavier, Hidalgo, Yolanda García, Flores, José Carlos, Gómez-Jordana, Blanca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9610374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36324973
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_582_2022
_version_ 1784819253326643200
author Santander, Xavier
Hidalgo, Yolanda García
Flores, José Carlos
Gómez-Jordana, Blanca
author_facet Santander, Xavier
Hidalgo, Yolanda García
Flores, José Carlos
Gómez-Jordana, Blanca
author_sort Santander, Xavier
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The sinking skin syndrome (SSS) is a particular complication after a decompressive craniectomy (DC). It still remains a poorly understood and underestimated entity. METHODS: Retrospective case series of craniectomized patients with and without SSS. Clinical and radiological features (DC diameter, shape of craniectomy flap, and midline deviation) were described and relative volumes of intracranial loss were quantified. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (63% with SSS). The most common indication for DC was traumatic brain injury: 48.15%. The p50 diameter of DC was 12.8 cm for patients with SSS and 11.1 cm for patients without (Z score = 0.32). DC area was 81.5 cm(2) for patients with SSS and 71.43 cm(2) for patients without the syndrome (Z score = 0.61). According to the shape of the craniectomy flap, we classified our patients as: «same level» (51.8%), «sunken» (25.9%), and «extracranial herniation» (14.8%). Two patients (7.4%) had paradoxical herniation. Midline deviation was present in 12 (70.6%) patients with SSS. The 3(rd) ventricle volume average was 1.2 cc for patients with SSS versus 2.35 cc for patients without (Z score = 0.04). About 94.11% of patients (16 out of 17) clearly improved after replacement of the cranial defect. CONCLUSION: In our series, low 3(rd) ventricle volumes had a good relation with SSS. The presence of a sunken flap does not guarantee SSS per se and we propose the following radiologic description: A = sunken, B = same level, C = extracranial herniation, and D = paradoxical. Replacement of the skull defect is the main treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9610374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96103742022-11-01 Sinking skin syndrome in a decompressive craniectomy series: Clinical and radiological features Santander, Xavier Hidalgo, Yolanda García Flores, José Carlos Gómez-Jordana, Blanca Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: The sinking skin syndrome (SSS) is a particular complication after a decompressive craniectomy (DC). It still remains a poorly understood and underestimated entity. METHODS: Retrospective case series of craniectomized patients with and without SSS. Clinical and radiological features (DC diameter, shape of craniectomy flap, and midline deviation) were described and relative volumes of intracranial loss were quantified. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (63% with SSS). The most common indication for DC was traumatic brain injury: 48.15%. The p50 diameter of DC was 12.8 cm for patients with SSS and 11.1 cm for patients without (Z score = 0.32). DC area was 81.5 cm(2) for patients with SSS and 71.43 cm(2) for patients without the syndrome (Z score = 0.61). According to the shape of the craniectomy flap, we classified our patients as: «same level» (51.8%), «sunken» (25.9%), and «extracranial herniation» (14.8%). Two patients (7.4%) had paradoxical herniation. Midline deviation was present in 12 (70.6%) patients with SSS. The 3(rd) ventricle volume average was 1.2 cc for patients with SSS versus 2.35 cc for patients without (Z score = 0.04). About 94.11% of patients (16 out of 17) clearly improved after replacement of the cranial defect. CONCLUSION: In our series, low 3(rd) ventricle volumes had a good relation with SSS. The presence of a sunken flap does not guarantee SSS per se and we propose the following radiologic description: A = sunken, B = same level, C = extracranial herniation, and D = paradoxical. Replacement of the skull defect is the main treatment. Scientific Scholar 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9610374/ /pubmed/36324973 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_582_2022 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Santander, Xavier
Hidalgo, Yolanda García
Flores, José Carlos
Gómez-Jordana, Blanca
Sinking skin syndrome in a decompressive craniectomy series: Clinical and radiological features
title Sinking skin syndrome in a decompressive craniectomy series: Clinical and radiological features
title_full Sinking skin syndrome in a decompressive craniectomy series: Clinical and radiological features
title_fullStr Sinking skin syndrome in a decompressive craniectomy series: Clinical and radiological features
title_full_unstemmed Sinking skin syndrome in a decompressive craniectomy series: Clinical and radiological features
title_short Sinking skin syndrome in a decompressive craniectomy series: Clinical and radiological features
title_sort sinking skin syndrome in a decompressive craniectomy series: clinical and radiological features
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9610374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36324973
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_582_2022
work_keys_str_mv AT santanderxavier sinkingskinsyndromeinadecompressivecraniectomyseriesclinicalandradiologicalfeatures
AT hidalgoyolandagarcia sinkingskinsyndromeinadecompressivecraniectomyseriesclinicalandradiologicalfeatures
AT floresjosecarlos sinkingskinsyndromeinadecompressivecraniectomyseriesclinicalandradiologicalfeatures
AT gomezjordanablanca sinkingskinsyndromeinadecompressivecraniectomyseriesclinicalandradiologicalfeatures