Cargando…

Antibody Response to Rotavirus C Pre-Farrow Natural Planned Exposure to Gilts and Their Piglets

A longitudinal study was conducted to investigate the dynamics of genotype-specific (G6 and P[5]) antibody response to different doses (3, 2 and 1) of rotavirus C (RVC) natural planned exposure (NPE) in gilt serum, colostrum/milk and piglet serum, and compare with antibody response to rotavirus A NP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Deepak, Anderson, Amanda V., Pittman, Jeremy, Springer, Nora L., Marthaler, Douglas G., Mwangi, Waithaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9610825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36298806
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14102250
_version_ 1784819373662273536
author Kumar, Deepak
Anderson, Amanda V.
Pittman, Jeremy
Springer, Nora L.
Marthaler, Douglas G.
Mwangi, Waithaka
author_facet Kumar, Deepak
Anderson, Amanda V.
Pittman, Jeremy
Springer, Nora L.
Marthaler, Douglas G.
Mwangi, Waithaka
author_sort Kumar, Deepak
collection PubMed
description A longitudinal study was conducted to investigate the dynamics of genotype-specific (G6 and P[5]) antibody response to different doses (3, 2 and 1) of rotavirus C (RVC) natural planned exposure (NPE) in gilt serum, colostrum/milk and piglet serum, and compare with antibody response to rotavirus A NPE (RVA genotypes G4, G5, P[7] and P[23]). G6 and P[5] antigens of RVC were expressed in mammalian and bacterial cells, and used to develop individual indirect ELISAs. For both antigens, group 1 with 3 doses of NPE resulted in significantly higher IgG and IgA levels in colostrum compared to other groups. In piglet serum, group 1 P[5] IgG levels were significantly higher than other study groups at day 0 and 7. Piglet serum had higher IgA levels for group 1 piglets compared to other groups for both antigens. A comparison of colostrum antibody levels to rotavirus A (RVA) and RVC revealed that colostrum RVC IgG and IgA titers were lower than RVA titers irrespective of the G and P-type. Next generation sequencing (NGS) detected same RVC genotypes (G6 and P[5]) circulating in the piglet population under the window of lactogenic immunity. We conclude that the low RVC load in NPE material (real-time PCR Ct-values 32.55, 29.32 and 30.30) failed to induce sufficient maternal immunity in gilts (low colostrum RVC antibody levels) and passively prevent piglets from natural RVC infection in the farrowing room. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study comparing differences in antibody response to porcine RVA and RVC in a commercial setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9610825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96108252022-10-28 Antibody Response to Rotavirus C Pre-Farrow Natural Planned Exposure to Gilts and Their Piglets Kumar, Deepak Anderson, Amanda V. Pittman, Jeremy Springer, Nora L. Marthaler, Douglas G. Mwangi, Waithaka Viruses Article A longitudinal study was conducted to investigate the dynamics of genotype-specific (G6 and P[5]) antibody response to different doses (3, 2 and 1) of rotavirus C (RVC) natural planned exposure (NPE) in gilt serum, colostrum/milk and piglet serum, and compare with antibody response to rotavirus A NPE (RVA genotypes G4, G5, P[7] and P[23]). G6 and P[5] antigens of RVC were expressed in mammalian and bacterial cells, and used to develop individual indirect ELISAs. For both antigens, group 1 with 3 doses of NPE resulted in significantly higher IgG and IgA levels in colostrum compared to other groups. In piglet serum, group 1 P[5] IgG levels were significantly higher than other study groups at day 0 and 7. Piglet serum had higher IgA levels for group 1 piglets compared to other groups for both antigens. A comparison of colostrum antibody levels to rotavirus A (RVA) and RVC revealed that colostrum RVC IgG and IgA titers were lower than RVA titers irrespective of the G and P-type. Next generation sequencing (NGS) detected same RVC genotypes (G6 and P[5]) circulating in the piglet population under the window of lactogenic immunity. We conclude that the low RVC load in NPE material (real-time PCR Ct-values 32.55, 29.32 and 30.30) failed to induce sufficient maternal immunity in gilts (low colostrum RVC antibody levels) and passively prevent piglets from natural RVC infection in the farrowing room. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study comparing differences in antibody response to porcine RVA and RVC in a commercial setting. MDPI 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9610825/ /pubmed/36298806 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14102250 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kumar, Deepak
Anderson, Amanda V.
Pittman, Jeremy
Springer, Nora L.
Marthaler, Douglas G.
Mwangi, Waithaka
Antibody Response to Rotavirus C Pre-Farrow Natural Planned Exposure to Gilts and Their Piglets
title Antibody Response to Rotavirus C Pre-Farrow Natural Planned Exposure to Gilts and Their Piglets
title_full Antibody Response to Rotavirus C Pre-Farrow Natural Planned Exposure to Gilts and Their Piglets
title_fullStr Antibody Response to Rotavirus C Pre-Farrow Natural Planned Exposure to Gilts and Their Piglets
title_full_unstemmed Antibody Response to Rotavirus C Pre-Farrow Natural Planned Exposure to Gilts and Their Piglets
title_short Antibody Response to Rotavirus C Pre-Farrow Natural Planned Exposure to Gilts and Their Piglets
title_sort antibody response to rotavirus c pre-farrow natural planned exposure to gilts and their piglets
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9610825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36298806
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14102250
work_keys_str_mv AT kumardeepak antibodyresponsetorotaviruscprefarrownaturalplannedexposuretogiltsandtheirpiglets
AT andersonamandav antibodyresponsetorotaviruscprefarrownaturalplannedexposuretogiltsandtheirpiglets
AT pittmanjeremy antibodyresponsetorotaviruscprefarrownaturalplannedexposuretogiltsandtheirpiglets
AT springernoral antibodyresponsetorotaviruscprefarrownaturalplannedexposuretogiltsandtheirpiglets
AT marthalerdouglasg antibodyresponsetorotaviruscprefarrownaturalplannedexposuretogiltsandtheirpiglets
AT mwangiwaithaka antibodyresponsetorotaviruscprefarrownaturalplannedexposuretogiltsandtheirpiglets