Cargando…

Microcephaly and Associated Risk Factors in Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study

Congenital microcephaly is caused by a multitude of drivers affecting maternal–fetal health during pregnancy. It is a rare outcome in high-income industrial countries where microcephaly rates are in the range of 0.3–0.9 per 1000 newborns. Prevalence of microcephaly varies considerably across develop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melo, Natália de L., de Sousa, Danilo F., Laporta, Gabriel Z.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36288003
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7100261
_version_ 1784819485833691136
author Melo, Natália de L.
de Sousa, Danilo F.
Laporta, Gabriel Z.
author_facet Melo, Natália de L.
de Sousa, Danilo F.
Laporta, Gabriel Z.
author_sort Melo, Natália de L.
collection PubMed
description Congenital microcephaly is caused by a multitude of drivers affecting maternal–fetal health during pregnancy. It is a rare outcome in high-income industrial countries where microcephaly rates are in the range of 0.3–0.9 per 1000 newborns. Prevalence of microcephaly varies considerably across developing countries and can go as high as 58 cases per 1000 live births in pregnancies exposed to infection by Zika virus (ZIKV). Not only ZIKV-infected pregnancies, but other drivers can modulate the occurrence and severity of this outcome. Here, we sought to test the ZIKV–microcephaly association vs. competing hypotheses using a meta-analysis with 8341 microcephaly cases pooled from 10,250,994 newborns in the Americas, Africa, and Asia. Analysis of risk ratios (RR) showed teratogens the most likely microcephaly-associated risk factor (RR = 3.43; 95%-CI 2.69–4.38; p-value < 0.0001), while the statistical significance of the ZIKV–microcephaly association was marginal (RR = 2.12; 95%-CI 1.01–4.48; p-value = 0.048). Other congenital infections showed strong but variable associations with microcephaly (RR = 15.24; 95%-CI 1.74–133.70; p-value = 0.014). Microcephaly cases were associated with impoverished socioeconomic settings, but this association was statistically non-significant (RR = 2.75; 95%-CI 0.55–13.78; p-value = 0.22). The marginal ZIKV–microcephaly association and statistical significance of the competing hypotheses suggest maternal ZIKV infection might not be a cause of microcephaly alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9611276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96112762022-10-28 Microcephaly and Associated Risk Factors in Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study Melo, Natália de L. de Sousa, Danilo F. Laporta, Gabriel Z. Trop Med Infect Dis Systematic Review Congenital microcephaly is caused by a multitude of drivers affecting maternal–fetal health during pregnancy. It is a rare outcome in high-income industrial countries where microcephaly rates are in the range of 0.3–0.9 per 1000 newborns. Prevalence of microcephaly varies considerably across developing countries and can go as high as 58 cases per 1000 live births in pregnancies exposed to infection by Zika virus (ZIKV). Not only ZIKV-infected pregnancies, but other drivers can modulate the occurrence and severity of this outcome. Here, we sought to test the ZIKV–microcephaly association vs. competing hypotheses using a meta-analysis with 8341 microcephaly cases pooled from 10,250,994 newborns in the Americas, Africa, and Asia. Analysis of risk ratios (RR) showed teratogens the most likely microcephaly-associated risk factor (RR = 3.43; 95%-CI 2.69–4.38; p-value < 0.0001), while the statistical significance of the ZIKV–microcephaly association was marginal (RR = 2.12; 95%-CI 1.01–4.48; p-value = 0.048). Other congenital infections showed strong but variable associations with microcephaly (RR = 15.24; 95%-CI 1.74–133.70; p-value = 0.014). Microcephaly cases were associated with impoverished socioeconomic settings, but this association was statistically non-significant (RR = 2.75; 95%-CI 0.55–13.78; p-value = 0.22). The marginal ZIKV–microcephaly association and statistical significance of the competing hypotheses suggest maternal ZIKV infection might not be a cause of microcephaly alone. MDPI 2022-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9611276/ /pubmed/36288003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7100261 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Melo, Natália de L.
de Sousa, Danilo F.
Laporta, Gabriel Z.
Microcephaly and Associated Risk Factors in Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study
title Microcephaly and Associated Risk Factors in Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study
title_full Microcephaly and Associated Risk Factors in Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study
title_fullStr Microcephaly and Associated Risk Factors in Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study
title_full_unstemmed Microcephaly and Associated Risk Factors in Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study
title_short Microcephaly and Associated Risk Factors in Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study
title_sort microcephaly and associated risk factors in newborns: a systematic review and meta-analysis study
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36288003
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7100261
work_keys_str_mv AT melonataliadel microcephalyandassociatedriskfactorsinnewbornsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy
AT desousadanilof microcephalyandassociatedriskfactorsinnewbornsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy
AT laportagabrielz microcephalyandassociatedriskfactorsinnewbornsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy