Cargando…
Maize Lodging Resistance with Plastic Film Removal, Increased Planting Density, and Cultivars with Different Maturity Periods
While plastic film mulching and proper high-density planting are important methods that can improve maize yield, years of accumulated residual film have created soil pollution and degraded soil, and thus has impeded sustainable agriculture development. Here, we compared the stalk and root lodging re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36297747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11202723 |
_version_ | 1784819501020217344 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Xiyun Xue, Jun Tian, Ming Zhang, Guoqiang Ming, Bo Wang, Keru Hou, Peng Xie, Ruizhi Tang, Qiuxiang Li, Shaokun |
author_facet | Zhang, Xiyun Xue, Jun Tian, Ming Zhang, Guoqiang Ming, Bo Wang, Keru Hou, Peng Xie, Ruizhi Tang, Qiuxiang Li, Shaokun |
author_sort | Zhang, Xiyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | While plastic film mulching and proper high-density planting are important methods that can improve maize yield, years of accumulated residual film have created soil pollution and degraded soil, and thus has impeded sustainable agriculture development. Here, we compared the stalk and root lodging resistances of three maize cultivars grown at two planting densities both with (FM) and without (NM) plastic film mulch. Our aim was to provide a theoretical basis that may help assure a future of successful no-film planting with increased planting density. The results showed that, compared with FM, the average dry weight per unit length and bending strength of basal internode decreased for all cultivars at both planting densities in the NM treatment. At 9.0 × 10(4) plants ha(−1), the stalk breaking force (SFC) of Xinyu77, KWS9384, and KWS2030 in the NM treatment decreased by 4%, 21%, and 22%, respectively. At 12.0 × 10(4) plants ha(−1), SFC of Xinyu77 and KWS2030 increased by 14% and 1%, respectively, while KWS9384 decreased by 10%. Additionally, the root diameter, length, volume, width, depth, and the vertical root-pulling force of maize decreased. Although the lodging resistance of maize grown without film mulch was lower than that of maize grown with it, those adverse effects can be mitigated by selecting suitable cultivars and by using proper high-density planting and appropriate cultivation measures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9611338 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96113382022-10-28 Maize Lodging Resistance with Plastic Film Removal, Increased Planting Density, and Cultivars with Different Maturity Periods Zhang, Xiyun Xue, Jun Tian, Ming Zhang, Guoqiang Ming, Bo Wang, Keru Hou, Peng Xie, Ruizhi Tang, Qiuxiang Li, Shaokun Plants (Basel) Article While plastic film mulching and proper high-density planting are important methods that can improve maize yield, years of accumulated residual film have created soil pollution and degraded soil, and thus has impeded sustainable agriculture development. Here, we compared the stalk and root lodging resistances of three maize cultivars grown at two planting densities both with (FM) and without (NM) plastic film mulch. Our aim was to provide a theoretical basis that may help assure a future of successful no-film planting with increased planting density. The results showed that, compared with FM, the average dry weight per unit length and bending strength of basal internode decreased for all cultivars at both planting densities in the NM treatment. At 9.0 × 10(4) plants ha(−1), the stalk breaking force (SFC) of Xinyu77, KWS9384, and KWS2030 in the NM treatment decreased by 4%, 21%, and 22%, respectively. At 12.0 × 10(4) plants ha(−1), SFC of Xinyu77 and KWS2030 increased by 14% and 1%, respectively, while KWS9384 decreased by 10%. Additionally, the root diameter, length, volume, width, depth, and the vertical root-pulling force of maize decreased. Although the lodging resistance of maize grown without film mulch was lower than that of maize grown with it, those adverse effects can be mitigated by selecting suitable cultivars and by using proper high-density planting and appropriate cultivation measures. MDPI 2022-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9611338/ /pubmed/36297747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11202723 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Xiyun Xue, Jun Tian, Ming Zhang, Guoqiang Ming, Bo Wang, Keru Hou, Peng Xie, Ruizhi Tang, Qiuxiang Li, Shaokun Maize Lodging Resistance with Plastic Film Removal, Increased Planting Density, and Cultivars with Different Maturity Periods |
title | Maize Lodging Resistance with Plastic Film Removal, Increased Planting Density, and Cultivars with Different Maturity Periods |
title_full | Maize Lodging Resistance with Plastic Film Removal, Increased Planting Density, and Cultivars with Different Maturity Periods |
title_fullStr | Maize Lodging Resistance with Plastic Film Removal, Increased Planting Density, and Cultivars with Different Maturity Periods |
title_full_unstemmed | Maize Lodging Resistance with Plastic Film Removal, Increased Planting Density, and Cultivars with Different Maturity Periods |
title_short | Maize Lodging Resistance with Plastic Film Removal, Increased Planting Density, and Cultivars with Different Maturity Periods |
title_sort | maize lodging resistance with plastic film removal, increased planting density, and cultivars with different maturity periods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36297747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11202723 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangxiyun maizelodgingresistancewithplasticfilmremovalincreasedplantingdensityandcultivarswithdifferentmaturityperiods AT xuejun maizelodgingresistancewithplasticfilmremovalincreasedplantingdensityandcultivarswithdifferentmaturityperiods AT tianming maizelodgingresistancewithplasticfilmremovalincreasedplantingdensityandcultivarswithdifferentmaturityperiods AT zhangguoqiang maizelodgingresistancewithplasticfilmremovalincreasedplantingdensityandcultivarswithdifferentmaturityperiods AT mingbo maizelodgingresistancewithplasticfilmremovalincreasedplantingdensityandcultivarswithdifferentmaturityperiods AT wangkeru maizelodgingresistancewithplasticfilmremovalincreasedplantingdensityandcultivarswithdifferentmaturityperiods AT houpeng maizelodgingresistancewithplasticfilmremovalincreasedplantingdensityandcultivarswithdifferentmaturityperiods AT xieruizhi maizelodgingresistancewithplasticfilmremovalincreasedplantingdensityandcultivarswithdifferentmaturityperiods AT tangqiuxiang maizelodgingresistancewithplasticfilmremovalincreasedplantingdensityandcultivarswithdifferentmaturityperiods AT lishaokun maizelodgingresistancewithplasticfilmremovalincreasedplantingdensityandcultivarswithdifferentmaturityperiods |