Cargando…

Maize Lodging Resistance with Plastic Film Removal, Increased Planting Density, and Cultivars with Different Maturity Periods

While plastic film mulching and proper high-density planting are important methods that can improve maize yield, years of accumulated residual film have created soil pollution and degraded soil, and thus has impeded sustainable agriculture development. Here, we compared the stalk and root lodging re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xiyun, Xue, Jun, Tian, Ming, Zhang, Guoqiang, Ming, Bo, Wang, Keru, Hou, Peng, Xie, Ruizhi, Tang, Qiuxiang, Li, Shaokun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36297747
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11202723
_version_ 1784819501020217344
author Zhang, Xiyun
Xue, Jun
Tian, Ming
Zhang, Guoqiang
Ming, Bo
Wang, Keru
Hou, Peng
Xie, Ruizhi
Tang, Qiuxiang
Li, Shaokun
author_facet Zhang, Xiyun
Xue, Jun
Tian, Ming
Zhang, Guoqiang
Ming, Bo
Wang, Keru
Hou, Peng
Xie, Ruizhi
Tang, Qiuxiang
Li, Shaokun
author_sort Zhang, Xiyun
collection PubMed
description While plastic film mulching and proper high-density planting are important methods that can improve maize yield, years of accumulated residual film have created soil pollution and degraded soil, and thus has impeded sustainable agriculture development. Here, we compared the stalk and root lodging resistances of three maize cultivars grown at two planting densities both with (FM) and without (NM) plastic film mulch. Our aim was to provide a theoretical basis that may help assure a future of successful no-film planting with increased planting density. The results showed that, compared with FM, the average dry weight per unit length and bending strength of basal internode decreased for all cultivars at both planting densities in the NM treatment. At 9.0 × 10(4) plants ha(−1), the stalk breaking force (SFC) of Xinyu77, KWS9384, and KWS2030 in the NM treatment decreased by 4%, 21%, and 22%, respectively. At 12.0 × 10(4) plants ha(−1), SFC of Xinyu77 and KWS2030 increased by 14% and 1%, respectively, while KWS9384 decreased by 10%. Additionally, the root diameter, length, volume, width, depth, and the vertical root-pulling force of maize decreased. Although the lodging resistance of maize grown without film mulch was lower than that of maize grown with it, those adverse effects can be mitigated by selecting suitable cultivars and by using proper high-density planting and appropriate cultivation measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9611338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96113382022-10-28 Maize Lodging Resistance with Plastic Film Removal, Increased Planting Density, and Cultivars with Different Maturity Periods Zhang, Xiyun Xue, Jun Tian, Ming Zhang, Guoqiang Ming, Bo Wang, Keru Hou, Peng Xie, Ruizhi Tang, Qiuxiang Li, Shaokun Plants (Basel) Article While plastic film mulching and proper high-density planting are important methods that can improve maize yield, years of accumulated residual film have created soil pollution and degraded soil, and thus has impeded sustainable agriculture development. Here, we compared the stalk and root lodging resistances of three maize cultivars grown at two planting densities both with (FM) and without (NM) plastic film mulch. Our aim was to provide a theoretical basis that may help assure a future of successful no-film planting with increased planting density. The results showed that, compared with FM, the average dry weight per unit length and bending strength of basal internode decreased for all cultivars at both planting densities in the NM treatment. At 9.0 × 10(4) plants ha(−1), the stalk breaking force (SFC) of Xinyu77, KWS9384, and KWS2030 in the NM treatment decreased by 4%, 21%, and 22%, respectively. At 12.0 × 10(4) plants ha(−1), SFC of Xinyu77 and KWS2030 increased by 14% and 1%, respectively, while KWS9384 decreased by 10%. Additionally, the root diameter, length, volume, width, depth, and the vertical root-pulling force of maize decreased. Although the lodging resistance of maize grown without film mulch was lower than that of maize grown with it, those adverse effects can be mitigated by selecting suitable cultivars and by using proper high-density planting and appropriate cultivation measures. MDPI 2022-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9611338/ /pubmed/36297747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11202723 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Xiyun
Xue, Jun
Tian, Ming
Zhang, Guoqiang
Ming, Bo
Wang, Keru
Hou, Peng
Xie, Ruizhi
Tang, Qiuxiang
Li, Shaokun
Maize Lodging Resistance with Plastic Film Removal, Increased Planting Density, and Cultivars with Different Maturity Periods
title Maize Lodging Resistance with Plastic Film Removal, Increased Planting Density, and Cultivars with Different Maturity Periods
title_full Maize Lodging Resistance with Plastic Film Removal, Increased Planting Density, and Cultivars with Different Maturity Periods
title_fullStr Maize Lodging Resistance with Plastic Film Removal, Increased Planting Density, and Cultivars with Different Maturity Periods
title_full_unstemmed Maize Lodging Resistance with Plastic Film Removal, Increased Planting Density, and Cultivars with Different Maturity Periods
title_short Maize Lodging Resistance with Plastic Film Removal, Increased Planting Density, and Cultivars with Different Maturity Periods
title_sort maize lodging resistance with plastic film removal, increased planting density, and cultivars with different maturity periods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36297747
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11202723
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxiyun maizelodgingresistancewithplasticfilmremovalincreasedplantingdensityandcultivarswithdifferentmaturityperiods
AT xuejun maizelodgingresistancewithplasticfilmremovalincreasedplantingdensityandcultivarswithdifferentmaturityperiods
AT tianming maizelodgingresistancewithplasticfilmremovalincreasedplantingdensityandcultivarswithdifferentmaturityperiods
AT zhangguoqiang maizelodgingresistancewithplasticfilmremovalincreasedplantingdensityandcultivarswithdifferentmaturityperiods
AT mingbo maizelodgingresistancewithplasticfilmremovalincreasedplantingdensityandcultivarswithdifferentmaturityperiods
AT wangkeru maizelodgingresistancewithplasticfilmremovalincreasedplantingdensityandcultivarswithdifferentmaturityperiods
AT houpeng maizelodgingresistancewithplasticfilmremovalincreasedplantingdensityandcultivarswithdifferentmaturityperiods
AT xieruizhi maizelodgingresistancewithplasticfilmremovalincreasedplantingdensityandcultivarswithdifferentmaturityperiods
AT tangqiuxiang maizelodgingresistancewithplasticfilmremovalincreasedplantingdensityandcultivarswithdifferentmaturityperiods
AT lishaokun maizelodgingresistancewithplasticfilmremovalincreasedplantingdensityandcultivarswithdifferentmaturityperiods