Cargando…
Intraspecific Leaf Trait Variation across and within Five Common Wine Grape Varieties
Variability in traits forming the Leaf Economics Spectrum (LES) among and within crop species plays a key role in governing agroecosystem processes. However, studies evaluating the extent, causes, and consequences of within-species variation in LES traits for some of the world’s most common crops re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36297816 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11202792 |
_version_ | 1784819558360547328 |
---|---|
author | Macklin, Samantha C. Mariani, Rachel O. Young, Emily N. Kish, Rosalyn Cathline, Kimberley A. Robertson, Gavin Martin, Adam R. |
author_facet | Macklin, Samantha C. Mariani, Rachel O. Young, Emily N. Kish, Rosalyn Cathline, Kimberley A. Robertson, Gavin Martin, Adam R. |
author_sort | Macklin, Samantha C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Variability in traits forming the Leaf Economics Spectrum (LES) among and within crop species plays a key role in governing agroecosystem processes. However, studies evaluating the extent, causes, and consequences of within-species variation in LES traits for some of the world’s most common crops remain limited. This study quantified variations in nine leaf traits measured across 90 vines of five common wine grape (Vitis vinifera L.) varieties at two growth stages (post-flowering and veraison). Grape traits in these varieties covary along an intraspecific LES, in patterns similar to those documented in wild plants. Across the five varieties evaluated here, high rates of photosynthesis (A) and leaf nitrogen (N) concentrations were coupled with low leaf mass per area (LMA), whereas the opposite suite of traits defined the “resource-conserving end” of this intraspecific LES in grape. Variety identity was the strongest predictor of leaf physiological (A) and morphological traits (i.e., leaf area and leaf mass), whereas leaf chemical traits and LMA were best explained by growth stage. All five varieties expressed greater resource-conserving trait syndromes (i.e., higher LMA, lower N, and lower A(mass)) later in the growing season. Traits related to leaf hydraulics, including instantaneous water-use efficiency (WUE), were unrelated to LES and other resource capture traits, and were better explained by spatial location. These results highlight the relative contributions of genetic, developmental, and phenotypic factors in structuring trait variation in the five wine grape varieties evaluated here, and point to a key role of domestication in governing trait relationships in the world’s crops. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9611564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96115642022-10-28 Intraspecific Leaf Trait Variation across and within Five Common Wine Grape Varieties Macklin, Samantha C. Mariani, Rachel O. Young, Emily N. Kish, Rosalyn Cathline, Kimberley A. Robertson, Gavin Martin, Adam R. Plants (Basel) Article Variability in traits forming the Leaf Economics Spectrum (LES) among and within crop species plays a key role in governing agroecosystem processes. However, studies evaluating the extent, causes, and consequences of within-species variation in LES traits for some of the world’s most common crops remain limited. This study quantified variations in nine leaf traits measured across 90 vines of five common wine grape (Vitis vinifera L.) varieties at two growth stages (post-flowering and veraison). Grape traits in these varieties covary along an intraspecific LES, in patterns similar to those documented in wild plants. Across the five varieties evaluated here, high rates of photosynthesis (A) and leaf nitrogen (N) concentrations were coupled with low leaf mass per area (LMA), whereas the opposite suite of traits defined the “resource-conserving end” of this intraspecific LES in grape. Variety identity was the strongest predictor of leaf physiological (A) and morphological traits (i.e., leaf area and leaf mass), whereas leaf chemical traits and LMA were best explained by growth stage. All five varieties expressed greater resource-conserving trait syndromes (i.e., higher LMA, lower N, and lower A(mass)) later in the growing season. Traits related to leaf hydraulics, including instantaneous water-use efficiency (WUE), were unrelated to LES and other resource capture traits, and were better explained by spatial location. These results highlight the relative contributions of genetic, developmental, and phenotypic factors in structuring trait variation in the five wine grape varieties evaluated here, and point to a key role of domestication in governing trait relationships in the world’s crops. MDPI 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9611564/ /pubmed/36297816 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11202792 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Macklin, Samantha C. Mariani, Rachel O. Young, Emily N. Kish, Rosalyn Cathline, Kimberley A. Robertson, Gavin Martin, Adam R. Intraspecific Leaf Trait Variation across and within Five Common Wine Grape Varieties |
title | Intraspecific Leaf Trait Variation across and within Five Common Wine Grape Varieties |
title_full | Intraspecific Leaf Trait Variation across and within Five Common Wine Grape Varieties |
title_fullStr | Intraspecific Leaf Trait Variation across and within Five Common Wine Grape Varieties |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraspecific Leaf Trait Variation across and within Five Common Wine Grape Varieties |
title_short | Intraspecific Leaf Trait Variation across and within Five Common Wine Grape Varieties |
title_sort | intraspecific leaf trait variation across and within five common wine grape varieties |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36297816 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11202792 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT macklinsamanthac intraspecificleaftraitvariationacrossandwithinfivecommonwinegrapevarieties AT marianirachelo intraspecificleaftraitvariationacrossandwithinfivecommonwinegrapevarieties AT youngemilyn intraspecificleaftraitvariationacrossandwithinfivecommonwinegrapevarieties AT kishrosalyn intraspecificleaftraitvariationacrossandwithinfivecommonwinegrapevarieties AT cathlinekimberleya intraspecificleaftraitvariationacrossandwithinfivecommonwinegrapevarieties AT robertsongavin intraspecificleaftraitvariationacrossandwithinfivecommonwinegrapevarieties AT martinadamr intraspecificleaftraitvariationacrossandwithinfivecommonwinegrapevarieties |