Cargando…

Intraspecific Leaf Trait Variation across and within Five Common Wine Grape Varieties

Variability in traits forming the Leaf Economics Spectrum (LES) among and within crop species plays a key role in governing agroecosystem processes. However, studies evaluating the extent, causes, and consequences of within-species variation in LES traits for some of the world’s most common crops re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macklin, Samantha C., Mariani, Rachel O., Young, Emily N., Kish, Rosalyn, Cathline, Kimberley A., Robertson, Gavin, Martin, Adam R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36297816
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11202792
_version_ 1784819558360547328
author Macklin, Samantha C.
Mariani, Rachel O.
Young, Emily N.
Kish, Rosalyn
Cathline, Kimberley A.
Robertson, Gavin
Martin, Adam R.
author_facet Macklin, Samantha C.
Mariani, Rachel O.
Young, Emily N.
Kish, Rosalyn
Cathline, Kimberley A.
Robertson, Gavin
Martin, Adam R.
author_sort Macklin, Samantha C.
collection PubMed
description Variability in traits forming the Leaf Economics Spectrum (LES) among and within crop species plays a key role in governing agroecosystem processes. However, studies evaluating the extent, causes, and consequences of within-species variation in LES traits for some of the world’s most common crops remain limited. This study quantified variations in nine leaf traits measured across 90 vines of five common wine grape (Vitis vinifera L.) varieties at two growth stages (post-flowering and veraison). Grape traits in these varieties covary along an intraspecific LES, in patterns similar to those documented in wild plants. Across the five varieties evaluated here, high rates of photosynthesis (A) and leaf nitrogen (N) concentrations were coupled with low leaf mass per area (LMA), whereas the opposite suite of traits defined the “resource-conserving end” of this intraspecific LES in grape. Variety identity was the strongest predictor of leaf physiological (A) and morphological traits (i.e., leaf area and leaf mass), whereas leaf chemical traits and LMA were best explained by growth stage. All five varieties expressed greater resource-conserving trait syndromes (i.e., higher LMA, lower N, and lower A(mass)) later in the growing season. Traits related to leaf hydraulics, including instantaneous water-use efficiency (WUE), were unrelated to LES and other resource capture traits, and were better explained by spatial location. These results highlight the relative contributions of genetic, developmental, and phenotypic factors in structuring trait variation in the five wine grape varieties evaluated here, and point to a key role of domestication in governing trait relationships in the world’s crops.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9611564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96115642022-10-28 Intraspecific Leaf Trait Variation across and within Five Common Wine Grape Varieties Macklin, Samantha C. Mariani, Rachel O. Young, Emily N. Kish, Rosalyn Cathline, Kimberley A. Robertson, Gavin Martin, Adam R. Plants (Basel) Article Variability in traits forming the Leaf Economics Spectrum (LES) among and within crop species plays a key role in governing agroecosystem processes. However, studies evaluating the extent, causes, and consequences of within-species variation in LES traits for some of the world’s most common crops remain limited. This study quantified variations in nine leaf traits measured across 90 vines of five common wine grape (Vitis vinifera L.) varieties at two growth stages (post-flowering and veraison). Grape traits in these varieties covary along an intraspecific LES, in patterns similar to those documented in wild plants. Across the five varieties evaluated here, high rates of photosynthesis (A) and leaf nitrogen (N) concentrations were coupled with low leaf mass per area (LMA), whereas the opposite suite of traits defined the “resource-conserving end” of this intraspecific LES in grape. Variety identity was the strongest predictor of leaf physiological (A) and morphological traits (i.e., leaf area and leaf mass), whereas leaf chemical traits and LMA were best explained by growth stage. All five varieties expressed greater resource-conserving trait syndromes (i.e., higher LMA, lower N, and lower A(mass)) later in the growing season. Traits related to leaf hydraulics, including instantaneous water-use efficiency (WUE), were unrelated to LES and other resource capture traits, and were better explained by spatial location. These results highlight the relative contributions of genetic, developmental, and phenotypic factors in structuring trait variation in the five wine grape varieties evaluated here, and point to a key role of domestication in governing trait relationships in the world’s crops. MDPI 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9611564/ /pubmed/36297816 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11202792 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Macklin, Samantha C.
Mariani, Rachel O.
Young, Emily N.
Kish, Rosalyn
Cathline, Kimberley A.
Robertson, Gavin
Martin, Adam R.
Intraspecific Leaf Trait Variation across and within Five Common Wine Grape Varieties
title Intraspecific Leaf Trait Variation across and within Five Common Wine Grape Varieties
title_full Intraspecific Leaf Trait Variation across and within Five Common Wine Grape Varieties
title_fullStr Intraspecific Leaf Trait Variation across and within Five Common Wine Grape Varieties
title_full_unstemmed Intraspecific Leaf Trait Variation across and within Five Common Wine Grape Varieties
title_short Intraspecific Leaf Trait Variation across and within Five Common Wine Grape Varieties
title_sort intraspecific leaf trait variation across and within five common wine grape varieties
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36297816
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11202792
work_keys_str_mv AT macklinsamanthac intraspecificleaftraitvariationacrossandwithinfivecommonwinegrapevarieties
AT marianirachelo intraspecificleaftraitvariationacrossandwithinfivecommonwinegrapevarieties
AT youngemilyn intraspecificleaftraitvariationacrossandwithinfivecommonwinegrapevarieties
AT kishrosalyn intraspecificleaftraitvariationacrossandwithinfivecommonwinegrapevarieties
AT cathlinekimberleya intraspecificleaftraitvariationacrossandwithinfivecommonwinegrapevarieties
AT robertsongavin intraspecificleaftraitvariationacrossandwithinfivecommonwinegrapevarieties
AT martinadamr intraspecificleaftraitvariationacrossandwithinfivecommonwinegrapevarieties