Cargando…
A Systematic Review of Internet of Things in Clinical Laboratories: Opportunities, Advantages, and Challenges
The Internet of Things (IoT) is the network of physical objects embedded with sensors, software, electronics, and online connectivity systems. This study explores the role of IoT in clinical laboratory processes; this systematic review was conducted adhering to the PRISMA Statement 2020 guidelines....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36298402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22208051 |
_version_ | 1784819604250427392 |
---|---|
author | Munir, Tahir Akbar, Muhammad Soomair Ahmed, Sadia Sarfraz, Azza Sarfraz, Zouina Sarfraz, Muzna Felix, Miguel Cherrez-Ojeda, Ivan |
author_facet | Munir, Tahir Akbar, Muhammad Soomair Ahmed, Sadia Sarfraz, Azza Sarfraz, Zouina Sarfraz, Muzna Felix, Miguel Cherrez-Ojeda, Ivan |
author_sort | Munir, Tahir |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Internet of Things (IoT) is the network of physical objects embedded with sensors, software, electronics, and online connectivity systems. This study explores the role of IoT in clinical laboratory processes; this systematic review was conducted adhering to the PRISMA Statement 2020 guidelines. We included IoT models and applications across preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical laboratory processes. PubMed, Cochrane Central, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, IEEE, and A.C.M. Digital library were searched between August 2015 to August 2022; the data were tabulated. Cohen’s coefficient of agreement was calculated to quantify inter-reviewer agreements; a total of 18 studies were included with Cohen’s coefficient computed to be 0.91. The included studies were divided into three classifications based on availability, including preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical. The majority (77.8%) of the studies were real-tested. Communication-based approaches were the most common (83.3%), followed by application-based approaches (44.4%) and sensor-based approaches (33.3%) among the included studies. Open issues and challenges across the included studies included scalability, costs and energy consumption, interoperability, privacy and security, and performance issues. In this study, we identified, classified, and evaluated IoT applicability in clinical laboratory systems. This study presents pertinent findings for IoT development across clinical laboratory systems, for which it is essential that more rigorous and efficient testing and studies be conducted in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9611742 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96117422022-10-28 A Systematic Review of Internet of Things in Clinical Laboratories: Opportunities, Advantages, and Challenges Munir, Tahir Akbar, Muhammad Soomair Ahmed, Sadia Sarfraz, Azza Sarfraz, Zouina Sarfraz, Muzna Felix, Miguel Cherrez-Ojeda, Ivan Sensors (Basel) Systematic Review The Internet of Things (IoT) is the network of physical objects embedded with sensors, software, electronics, and online connectivity systems. This study explores the role of IoT in clinical laboratory processes; this systematic review was conducted adhering to the PRISMA Statement 2020 guidelines. We included IoT models and applications across preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical laboratory processes. PubMed, Cochrane Central, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, IEEE, and A.C.M. Digital library were searched between August 2015 to August 2022; the data were tabulated. Cohen’s coefficient of agreement was calculated to quantify inter-reviewer agreements; a total of 18 studies were included with Cohen’s coefficient computed to be 0.91. The included studies were divided into three classifications based on availability, including preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical. The majority (77.8%) of the studies were real-tested. Communication-based approaches were the most common (83.3%), followed by application-based approaches (44.4%) and sensor-based approaches (33.3%) among the included studies. Open issues and challenges across the included studies included scalability, costs and energy consumption, interoperability, privacy and security, and performance issues. In this study, we identified, classified, and evaluated IoT applicability in clinical laboratory systems. This study presents pertinent findings for IoT development across clinical laboratory systems, for which it is essential that more rigorous and efficient testing and studies be conducted in the future. MDPI 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9611742/ /pubmed/36298402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22208051 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Munir, Tahir Akbar, Muhammad Soomair Ahmed, Sadia Sarfraz, Azza Sarfraz, Zouina Sarfraz, Muzna Felix, Miguel Cherrez-Ojeda, Ivan A Systematic Review of Internet of Things in Clinical Laboratories: Opportunities, Advantages, and Challenges |
title | A Systematic Review of Internet of Things in Clinical Laboratories: Opportunities, Advantages, and Challenges |
title_full | A Systematic Review of Internet of Things in Clinical Laboratories: Opportunities, Advantages, and Challenges |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of Internet of Things in Clinical Laboratories: Opportunities, Advantages, and Challenges |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of Internet of Things in Clinical Laboratories: Opportunities, Advantages, and Challenges |
title_short | A Systematic Review of Internet of Things in Clinical Laboratories: Opportunities, Advantages, and Challenges |
title_sort | systematic review of internet of things in clinical laboratories: opportunities, advantages, and challenges |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36298402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22208051 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munirtahir asystematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges AT akbarmuhammadsoomair asystematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges AT ahmedsadia asystematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges AT sarfrazazza asystematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges AT sarfrazzouina asystematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges AT sarfrazmuzna asystematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges AT felixmiguel asystematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges AT cherrezojedaivan asystematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges AT munirtahir systematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges AT akbarmuhammadsoomair systematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges AT ahmedsadia systematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges AT sarfrazazza systematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges AT sarfrazzouina systematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges AT sarfrazmuzna systematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges AT felixmiguel systematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges AT cherrezojedaivan systematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges |