Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Internet of Things in Clinical Laboratories: Opportunities, Advantages, and Challenges

The Internet of Things (IoT) is the network of physical objects embedded with sensors, software, electronics, and online connectivity systems. This study explores the role of IoT in clinical laboratory processes; this systematic review was conducted adhering to the PRISMA Statement 2020 guidelines....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munir, Tahir, Akbar, Muhammad Soomair, Ahmed, Sadia, Sarfraz, Azza, Sarfraz, Zouina, Sarfraz, Muzna, Felix, Miguel, Cherrez-Ojeda, Ivan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36298402
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22208051
_version_ 1784819604250427392
author Munir, Tahir
Akbar, Muhammad Soomair
Ahmed, Sadia
Sarfraz, Azza
Sarfraz, Zouina
Sarfraz, Muzna
Felix, Miguel
Cherrez-Ojeda, Ivan
author_facet Munir, Tahir
Akbar, Muhammad Soomair
Ahmed, Sadia
Sarfraz, Azza
Sarfraz, Zouina
Sarfraz, Muzna
Felix, Miguel
Cherrez-Ojeda, Ivan
author_sort Munir, Tahir
collection PubMed
description The Internet of Things (IoT) is the network of physical objects embedded with sensors, software, electronics, and online connectivity systems. This study explores the role of IoT in clinical laboratory processes; this systematic review was conducted adhering to the PRISMA Statement 2020 guidelines. We included IoT models and applications across preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical laboratory processes. PubMed, Cochrane Central, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, IEEE, and A.C.M. Digital library were searched between August 2015 to August 2022; the data were tabulated. Cohen’s coefficient of agreement was calculated to quantify inter-reviewer agreements; a total of 18 studies were included with Cohen’s coefficient computed to be 0.91. The included studies were divided into three classifications based on availability, including preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical. The majority (77.8%) of the studies were real-tested. Communication-based approaches were the most common (83.3%), followed by application-based approaches (44.4%) and sensor-based approaches (33.3%) among the included studies. Open issues and challenges across the included studies included scalability, costs and energy consumption, interoperability, privacy and security, and performance issues. In this study, we identified, classified, and evaluated IoT applicability in clinical laboratory systems. This study presents pertinent findings for IoT development across clinical laboratory systems, for which it is essential that more rigorous and efficient testing and studies be conducted in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9611742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96117422022-10-28 A Systematic Review of Internet of Things in Clinical Laboratories: Opportunities, Advantages, and Challenges Munir, Tahir Akbar, Muhammad Soomair Ahmed, Sadia Sarfraz, Azza Sarfraz, Zouina Sarfraz, Muzna Felix, Miguel Cherrez-Ojeda, Ivan Sensors (Basel) Systematic Review The Internet of Things (IoT) is the network of physical objects embedded with sensors, software, electronics, and online connectivity systems. This study explores the role of IoT in clinical laboratory processes; this systematic review was conducted adhering to the PRISMA Statement 2020 guidelines. We included IoT models and applications across preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical laboratory processes. PubMed, Cochrane Central, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, IEEE, and A.C.M. Digital library were searched between August 2015 to August 2022; the data were tabulated. Cohen’s coefficient of agreement was calculated to quantify inter-reviewer agreements; a total of 18 studies were included with Cohen’s coefficient computed to be 0.91. The included studies were divided into three classifications based on availability, including preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical. The majority (77.8%) of the studies were real-tested. Communication-based approaches were the most common (83.3%), followed by application-based approaches (44.4%) and sensor-based approaches (33.3%) among the included studies. Open issues and challenges across the included studies included scalability, costs and energy consumption, interoperability, privacy and security, and performance issues. In this study, we identified, classified, and evaluated IoT applicability in clinical laboratory systems. This study presents pertinent findings for IoT development across clinical laboratory systems, for which it is essential that more rigorous and efficient testing and studies be conducted in the future. MDPI 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9611742/ /pubmed/36298402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22208051 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Munir, Tahir
Akbar, Muhammad Soomair
Ahmed, Sadia
Sarfraz, Azza
Sarfraz, Zouina
Sarfraz, Muzna
Felix, Miguel
Cherrez-Ojeda, Ivan
A Systematic Review of Internet of Things in Clinical Laboratories: Opportunities, Advantages, and Challenges
title A Systematic Review of Internet of Things in Clinical Laboratories: Opportunities, Advantages, and Challenges
title_full A Systematic Review of Internet of Things in Clinical Laboratories: Opportunities, Advantages, and Challenges
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Internet of Things in Clinical Laboratories: Opportunities, Advantages, and Challenges
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Internet of Things in Clinical Laboratories: Opportunities, Advantages, and Challenges
title_short A Systematic Review of Internet of Things in Clinical Laboratories: Opportunities, Advantages, and Challenges
title_sort systematic review of internet of things in clinical laboratories: opportunities, advantages, and challenges
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36298402
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22208051
work_keys_str_mv AT munirtahir asystematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges
AT akbarmuhammadsoomair asystematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges
AT ahmedsadia asystematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges
AT sarfrazazza asystematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges
AT sarfrazzouina asystematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges
AT sarfrazmuzna asystematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges
AT felixmiguel asystematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges
AT cherrezojedaivan asystematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges
AT munirtahir systematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges
AT akbarmuhammadsoomair systematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges
AT ahmedsadia systematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges
AT sarfrazazza systematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges
AT sarfrazzouina systematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges
AT sarfrazmuzna systematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges
AT felixmiguel systematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges
AT cherrezojedaivan systematicreviewofinternetofthingsinclinicallaboratoriesopportunitiesadvantagesandchallenges