Cargando…
Toward Optimized (89)Zr-Immuno-PET: Side-by-Side Comparison of [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-, [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)- and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-Cetuximab for Tumor Imaging: Which Chelator Is the Most Suitable?
(89)Zr represents a highly favorable positron emitter for application in immuno-PET (Positron Emission Tomography) imaging. Clinically, the (89)Zr(4+) ion is introduced into antibodies by complexation with desferrioxamine B. However, producing complexes of limited kinetic inertness. Therefore, sever...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36297549 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14102114 |
_version_ | 1784819617302052864 |
---|---|
author | Damerow, Helen Cheng, Xia von Kiedrowski, Valeska Schirrmacher, Ralf Wängler, Björn Fricker, Gert Wängler, Carmen |
author_facet | Damerow, Helen Cheng, Xia von Kiedrowski, Valeska Schirrmacher, Ralf Wängler, Björn Fricker, Gert Wängler, Carmen |
author_sort | Damerow, Helen |
collection | PubMed |
description | (89)Zr represents a highly favorable positron emitter for application in immuno-PET (Positron Emission Tomography) imaging. Clinically, the (89)Zr(4+) ion is introduced into antibodies by complexation with desferrioxamine B. However, producing complexes of limited kinetic inertness. Therefore, several new chelators for (89)Zr introduction have been developed over the last years. Of these, the direct comparison of the most relevant ones for clinical translation, DFO* and 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO), is still missing. Thus, we directly compared DFO with DFO* and 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO) immunoconjugates to identify the most suitable agent stable (89)Zr-complexation. The chelators were introduced into cetuximab, and an optical analysis method was developed, enabling the efficient quantification of derivatization sites per protein. The cetuximab conjugates were efficiently obtained and radiolabeled with (89)Zr at 37 °C within 30 min, giving the [(89)Zr]Zr-cetuximab derivatives in high radiochemical yields and purities of >99% as well as specific activities of 50 MBq/mg. The immunoreactive fraction of all (89)Zr-labeled cetuximab derivatives was determined to be in the range of 86.5–88.1%. In vivo PET imaging and ex vivo biodistribution studies in tumor-bearing animals revealed a comparable and significantly higher kinetic inertness for both [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)-cetuximab and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-cetuximab, compared to [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-cetuximab. Of these, [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-cetuximab showed a considerably more favorable pharmacokinetic profile with significantly lower liver and spleen retention than [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)-cetuximab. Since [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO* demonstrates a very high kinetic inertness, paired with a highly favorable pharmacokinetic profile of the resulting antibody conjugate, DFO* currently represents the most suitable chelator candidate for stable (89)Zr-radiolabeling of antibodies and clinical translation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9611803 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96118032022-10-28 Toward Optimized (89)Zr-Immuno-PET: Side-by-Side Comparison of [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-, [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)- and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-Cetuximab for Tumor Imaging: Which Chelator Is the Most Suitable? Damerow, Helen Cheng, Xia von Kiedrowski, Valeska Schirrmacher, Ralf Wängler, Björn Fricker, Gert Wängler, Carmen Pharmaceutics Article (89)Zr represents a highly favorable positron emitter for application in immuno-PET (Positron Emission Tomography) imaging. Clinically, the (89)Zr(4+) ion is introduced into antibodies by complexation with desferrioxamine B. However, producing complexes of limited kinetic inertness. Therefore, several new chelators for (89)Zr introduction have been developed over the last years. Of these, the direct comparison of the most relevant ones for clinical translation, DFO* and 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO), is still missing. Thus, we directly compared DFO with DFO* and 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO) immunoconjugates to identify the most suitable agent stable (89)Zr-complexation. The chelators were introduced into cetuximab, and an optical analysis method was developed, enabling the efficient quantification of derivatization sites per protein. The cetuximab conjugates were efficiently obtained and radiolabeled with (89)Zr at 37 °C within 30 min, giving the [(89)Zr]Zr-cetuximab derivatives in high radiochemical yields and purities of >99% as well as specific activities of 50 MBq/mg. The immunoreactive fraction of all (89)Zr-labeled cetuximab derivatives was determined to be in the range of 86.5–88.1%. In vivo PET imaging and ex vivo biodistribution studies in tumor-bearing animals revealed a comparable and significantly higher kinetic inertness for both [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)-cetuximab and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-cetuximab, compared to [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-cetuximab. Of these, [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-cetuximab showed a considerably more favorable pharmacokinetic profile with significantly lower liver and spleen retention than [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)-cetuximab. Since [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO* demonstrates a very high kinetic inertness, paired with a highly favorable pharmacokinetic profile of the resulting antibody conjugate, DFO* currently represents the most suitable chelator candidate for stable (89)Zr-radiolabeling of antibodies and clinical translation. MDPI 2022-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9611803/ /pubmed/36297549 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14102114 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Damerow, Helen Cheng, Xia von Kiedrowski, Valeska Schirrmacher, Ralf Wängler, Björn Fricker, Gert Wängler, Carmen Toward Optimized (89)Zr-Immuno-PET: Side-by-Side Comparison of [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-, [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)- and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-Cetuximab for Tumor Imaging: Which Chelator Is the Most Suitable? |
title | Toward Optimized (89)Zr-Immuno-PET: Side-by-Side Comparison of [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-, [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)- and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-Cetuximab for Tumor Imaging: Which Chelator Is the Most Suitable? |
title_full | Toward Optimized (89)Zr-Immuno-PET: Side-by-Side Comparison of [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-, [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)- and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-Cetuximab for Tumor Imaging: Which Chelator Is the Most Suitable? |
title_fullStr | Toward Optimized (89)Zr-Immuno-PET: Side-by-Side Comparison of [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-, [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)- and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-Cetuximab for Tumor Imaging: Which Chelator Is the Most Suitable? |
title_full_unstemmed | Toward Optimized (89)Zr-Immuno-PET: Side-by-Side Comparison of [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-, [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)- and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-Cetuximab for Tumor Imaging: Which Chelator Is the Most Suitable? |
title_short | Toward Optimized (89)Zr-Immuno-PET: Side-by-Side Comparison of [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-, [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)- and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-Cetuximab for Tumor Imaging: Which Chelator Is the Most Suitable? |
title_sort | toward optimized (89)zr-immuno-pet: side-by-side comparison of [(89)zr]zr-dfo-, [(89)zr]zr-3,4,3-(li-1,2-hopo)- and [(89)zr]zr-dfo*-cetuximab for tumor imaging: which chelator is the most suitable? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36297549 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14102114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT damerowhelen towardoptimized89zrimmunopetsidebysidecomparisonof89zrzrdfo89zrzr343li12hopoand89zrzrdfocetuximabfortumorimagingwhichchelatoristhemostsuitable AT chengxia towardoptimized89zrimmunopetsidebysidecomparisonof89zrzrdfo89zrzr343li12hopoand89zrzrdfocetuximabfortumorimagingwhichchelatoristhemostsuitable AT vonkiedrowskivaleska towardoptimized89zrimmunopetsidebysidecomparisonof89zrzrdfo89zrzr343li12hopoand89zrzrdfocetuximabfortumorimagingwhichchelatoristhemostsuitable AT schirrmacherralf towardoptimized89zrimmunopetsidebysidecomparisonof89zrzrdfo89zrzr343li12hopoand89zrzrdfocetuximabfortumorimagingwhichchelatoristhemostsuitable AT wanglerbjorn towardoptimized89zrimmunopetsidebysidecomparisonof89zrzrdfo89zrzr343li12hopoand89zrzrdfocetuximabfortumorimagingwhichchelatoristhemostsuitable AT frickergert towardoptimized89zrimmunopetsidebysidecomparisonof89zrzrdfo89zrzr343li12hopoand89zrzrdfocetuximabfortumorimagingwhichchelatoristhemostsuitable AT wanglercarmen towardoptimized89zrimmunopetsidebysidecomparisonof89zrzrdfo89zrzr343li12hopoand89zrzrdfocetuximabfortumorimagingwhichchelatoristhemostsuitable |