Cargando…

Toward Optimized (89)Zr-Immuno-PET: Side-by-Side Comparison of [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-, [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)- and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-Cetuximab for Tumor Imaging: Which Chelator Is the Most Suitable?

(89)Zr represents a highly favorable positron emitter for application in immuno-PET (Positron Emission Tomography) imaging. Clinically, the (89)Zr(4+) ion is introduced into antibodies by complexation with desferrioxamine B. However, producing complexes of limited kinetic inertness. Therefore, sever...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Damerow, Helen, Cheng, Xia, von Kiedrowski, Valeska, Schirrmacher, Ralf, Wängler, Björn, Fricker, Gert, Wängler, Carmen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36297549
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14102114
_version_ 1784819617302052864
author Damerow, Helen
Cheng, Xia
von Kiedrowski, Valeska
Schirrmacher, Ralf
Wängler, Björn
Fricker, Gert
Wängler, Carmen
author_facet Damerow, Helen
Cheng, Xia
von Kiedrowski, Valeska
Schirrmacher, Ralf
Wängler, Björn
Fricker, Gert
Wängler, Carmen
author_sort Damerow, Helen
collection PubMed
description (89)Zr represents a highly favorable positron emitter for application in immuno-PET (Positron Emission Tomography) imaging. Clinically, the (89)Zr(4+) ion is introduced into antibodies by complexation with desferrioxamine B. However, producing complexes of limited kinetic inertness. Therefore, several new chelators for (89)Zr introduction have been developed over the last years. Of these, the direct comparison of the most relevant ones for clinical translation, DFO* and 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO), is still missing. Thus, we directly compared DFO with DFO* and 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO) immunoconjugates to identify the most suitable agent stable (89)Zr-complexation. The chelators were introduced into cetuximab, and an optical analysis method was developed, enabling the efficient quantification of derivatization sites per protein. The cetuximab conjugates were efficiently obtained and radiolabeled with (89)Zr at 37 °C within 30 min, giving the [(89)Zr]Zr-cetuximab derivatives in high radiochemical yields and purities of >99% as well as specific activities of 50 MBq/mg. The immunoreactive fraction of all (89)Zr-labeled cetuximab derivatives was determined to be in the range of 86.5–88.1%. In vivo PET imaging and ex vivo biodistribution studies in tumor-bearing animals revealed a comparable and significantly higher kinetic inertness for both [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)-cetuximab and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-cetuximab, compared to [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-cetuximab. Of these, [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-cetuximab showed a considerably more favorable pharmacokinetic profile with significantly lower liver and spleen retention than [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)-cetuximab. Since [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO* demonstrates a very high kinetic inertness, paired with a highly favorable pharmacokinetic profile of the resulting antibody conjugate, DFO* currently represents the most suitable chelator candidate for stable (89)Zr-radiolabeling of antibodies and clinical translation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9611803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96118032022-10-28 Toward Optimized (89)Zr-Immuno-PET: Side-by-Side Comparison of [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-, [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)- and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-Cetuximab for Tumor Imaging: Which Chelator Is the Most Suitable? Damerow, Helen Cheng, Xia von Kiedrowski, Valeska Schirrmacher, Ralf Wängler, Björn Fricker, Gert Wängler, Carmen Pharmaceutics Article (89)Zr represents a highly favorable positron emitter for application in immuno-PET (Positron Emission Tomography) imaging. Clinically, the (89)Zr(4+) ion is introduced into antibodies by complexation with desferrioxamine B. However, producing complexes of limited kinetic inertness. Therefore, several new chelators for (89)Zr introduction have been developed over the last years. Of these, the direct comparison of the most relevant ones for clinical translation, DFO* and 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO), is still missing. Thus, we directly compared DFO with DFO* and 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO) immunoconjugates to identify the most suitable agent stable (89)Zr-complexation. The chelators were introduced into cetuximab, and an optical analysis method was developed, enabling the efficient quantification of derivatization sites per protein. The cetuximab conjugates were efficiently obtained and radiolabeled with (89)Zr at 37 °C within 30 min, giving the [(89)Zr]Zr-cetuximab derivatives in high radiochemical yields and purities of >99% as well as specific activities of 50 MBq/mg. The immunoreactive fraction of all (89)Zr-labeled cetuximab derivatives was determined to be in the range of 86.5–88.1%. In vivo PET imaging and ex vivo biodistribution studies in tumor-bearing animals revealed a comparable and significantly higher kinetic inertness for both [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)-cetuximab and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-cetuximab, compared to [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-cetuximab. Of these, [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-cetuximab showed a considerably more favorable pharmacokinetic profile with significantly lower liver and spleen retention than [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)-cetuximab. Since [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO* demonstrates a very high kinetic inertness, paired with a highly favorable pharmacokinetic profile of the resulting antibody conjugate, DFO* currently represents the most suitable chelator candidate for stable (89)Zr-radiolabeling of antibodies and clinical translation. MDPI 2022-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9611803/ /pubmed/36297549 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14102114 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Damerow, Helen
Cheng, Xia
von Kiedrowski, Valeska
Schirrmacher, Ralf
Wängler, Björn
Fricker, Gert
Wängler, Carmen
Toward Optimized (89)Zr-Immuno-PET: Side-by-Side Comparison of [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-, [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)- and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-Cetuximab for Tumor Imaging: Which Chelator Is the Most Suitable?
title Toward Optimized (89)Zr-Immuno-PET: Side-by-Side Comparison of [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-, [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)- and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-Cetuximab for Tumor Imaging: Which Chelator Is the Most Suitable?
title_full Toward Optimized (89)Zr-Immuno-PET: Side-by-Side Comparison of [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-, [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)- and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-Cetuximab for Tumor Imaging: Which Chelator Is the Most Suitable?
title_fullStr Toward Optimized (89)Zr-Immuno-PET: Side-by-Side Comparison of [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-, [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)- and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-Cetuximab for Tumor Imaging: Which Chelator Is the Most Suitable?
title_full_unstemmed Toward Optimized (89)Zr-Immuno-PET: Side-by-Side Comparison of [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-, [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)- and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-Cetuximab for Tumor Imaging: Which Chelator Is the Most Suitable?
title_short Toward Optimized (89)Zr-Immuno-PET: Side-by-Side Comparison of [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-, [(89)Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)- and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-Cetuximab for Tumor Imaging: Which Chelator Is the Most Suitable?
title_sort toward optimized (89)zr-immuno-pet: side-by-side comparison of [(89)zr]zr-dfo-, [(89)zr]zr-3,4,3-(li-1,2-hopo)- and [(89)zr]zr-dfo*-cetuximab for tumor imaging: which chelator is the most suitable?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36297549
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14102114
work_keys_str_mv AT damerowhelen towardoptimized89zrimmunopetsidebysidecomparisonof89zrzrdfo89zrzr343li12hopoand89zrzrdfocetuximabfortumorimagingwhichchelatoristhemostsuitable
AT chengxia towardoptimized89zrimmunopetsidebysidecomparisonof89zrzrdfo89zrzr343li12hopoand89zrzrdfocetuximabfortumorimagingwhichchelatoristhemostsuitable
AT vonkiedrowskivaleska towardoptimized89zrimmunopetsidebysidecomparisonof89zrzrdfo89zrzr343li12hopoand89zrzrdfocetuximabfortumorimagingwhichchelatoristhemostsuitable
AT schirrmacherralf towardoptimized89zrimmunopetsidebysidecomparisonof89zrzrdfo89zrzr343li12hopoand89zrzrdfocetuximabfortumorimagingwhichchelatoristhemostsuitable
AT wanglerbjorn towardoptimized89zrimmunopetsidebysidecomparisonof89zrzrdfo89zrzr343li12hopoand89zrzrdfocetuximabfortumorimagingwhichchelatoristhemostsuitable
AT frickergert towardoptimized89zrimmunopetsidebysidecomparisonof89zrzrdfo89zrzr343li12hopoand89zrzrdfocetuximabfortumorimagingwhichchelatoristhemostsuitable
AT wanglercarmen towardoptimized89zrimmunopetsidebysidecomparisonof89zrzrdfo89zrzr343li12hopoand89zrzrdfocetuximabfortumorimagingwhichchelatoristhemostsuitable