Cargando…

Comparative Study on the Distribution of Essential, Non-Essential Toxic, and Other Elements across Trophic Levels in Various Edible Aquatic Organisms in Sri Lanka and Dietary Human Risk Assessment

Thirty-six elements are categorized as essential but toxic in excess amount (EBTEs), non-essential toxic (NETs), and Other in 29 different edible aquatic species dwelling in offshore pelagic, and coastal and estuarine (CE) ecosystems were investigated in Sri Lanka. Elements were analyzed using an en...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wickrama-Arachchige, Anura Upasanta-Kumara, Guruge, Keerthi S., Tani, Hinako, Dharmaratne, Tilak Siri, Kumara, Marappullige P., Niizuma, Yasuaki, Ohura, Takeshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36287865
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10100585
_version_ 1784819694652358656
author Wickrama-Arachchige, Anura Upasanta-Kumara
Guruge, Keerthi S.
Tani, Hinako
Dharmaratne, Tilak Siri
Kumara, Marappullige P.
Niizuma, Yasuaki
Ohura, Takeshi
author_facet Wickrama-Arachchige, Anura Upasanta-Kumara
Guruge, Keerthi S.
Tani, Hinako
Dharmaratne, Tilak Siri
Kumara, Marappullige P.
Niizuma, Yasuaki
Ohura, Takeshi
author_sort Wickrama-Arachchige, Anura Upasanta-Kumara
collection PubMed
description Thirty-six elements are categorized as essential but toxic in excess amount (EBTEs), non-essential toxic (NETs), and Other in 29 different edible aquatic species dwelling in offshore pelagic, and coastal and estuarine (CE) ecosystems were investigated in Sri Lanka. Elements were analyzed using an energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) spectrometer, and an NIC MA-3000 Mercury Analyzer. EBTEs showed a negative relationship, whereas NETs showed a positive relationship between the concentration (mg/kg wet weight) and trophic levels in both ecosystems. EBTEs showed trophic dilution, whereas NETs showed trophic magnification. Some elements in a few organisms exceeded the maximum allowable limit which is safe for human consumption. There was a positive relationship (R(2) = 0.85) between the concentration of mercury and body weight of yellowfin tuna (YFT). For the widely consumed YFT, the calculated hazard index (HI) for the non-carcinogenic health and exposure daily intake of NETs for adults were 0.27 and 9.38 × 10(−5) mg/kg bw/day, respectively. The estimated provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) (μg/kg bw/w) was 0.47 for arsenic and 0.05 for antimony, cadmium, mercury, and lead. The HI and PTWI values were below the recommended limits; thus, consumption of YFT does not pose any health risk for Sri Lankan adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9612099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96120992022-10-28 Comparative Study on the Distribution of Essential, Non-Essential Toxic, and Other Elements across Trophic Levels in Various Edible Aquatic Organisms in Sri Lanka and Dietary Human Risk Assessment Wickrama-Arachchige, Anura Upasanta-Kumara Guruge, Keerthi S. Tani, Hinako Dharmaratne, Tilak Siri Kumara, Marappullige P. Niizuma, Yasuaki Ohura, Takeshi Toxics Article Thirty-six elements are categorized as essential but toxic in excess amount (EBTEs), non-essential toxic (NETs), and Other in 29 different edible aquatic species dwelling in offshore pelagic, and coastal and estuarine (CE) ecosystems were investigated in Sri Lanka. Elements were analyzed using an energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) spectrometer, and an NIC MA-3000 Mercury Analyzer. EBTEs showed a negative relationship, whereas NETs showed a positive relationship between the concentration (mg/kg wet weight) and trophic levels in both ecosystems. EBTEs showed trophic dilution, whereas NETs showed trophic magnification. Some elements in a few organisms exceeded the maximum allowable limit which is safe for human consumption. There was a positive relationship (R(2) = 0.85) between the concentration of mercury and body weight of yellowfin tuna (YFT). For the widely consumed YFT, the calculated hazard index (HI) for the non-carcinogenic health and exposure daily intake of NETs for adults were 0.27 and 9.38 × 10(−5) mg/kg bw/day, respectively. The estimated provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) (μg/kg bw/w) was 0.47 for arsenic and 0.05 for antimony, cadmium, mercury, and lead. The HI and PTWI values were below the recommended limits; thus, consumption of YFT does not pose any health risk for Sri Lankan adults. MDPI 2022-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9612099/ /pubmed/36287865 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10100585 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wickrama-Arachchige, Anura Upasanta-Kumara
Guruge, Keerthi S.
Tani, Hinako
Dharmaratne, Tilak Siri
Kumara, Marappullige P.
Niizuma, Yasuaki
Ohura, Takeshi
Comparative Study on the Distribution of Essential, Non-Essential Toxic, and Other Elements across Trophic Levels in Various Edible Aquatic Organisms in Sri Lanka and Dietary Human Risk Assessment
title Comparative Study on the Distribution of Essential, Non-Essential Toxic, and Other Elements across Trophic Levels in Various Edible Aquatic Organisms in Sri Lanka and Dietary Human Risk Assessment
title_full Comparative Study on the Distribution of Essential, Non-Essential Toxic, and Other Elements across Trophic Levels in Various Edible Aquatic Organisms in Sri Lanka and Dietary Human Risk Assessment
title_fullStr Comparative Study on the Distribution of Essential, Non-Essential Toxic, and Other Elements across Trophic Levels in Various Edible Aquatic Organisms in Sri Lanka and Dietary Human Risk Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study on the Distribution of Essential, Non-Essential Toxic, and Other Elements across Trophic Levels in Various Edible Aquatic Organisms in Sri Lanka and Dietary Human Risk Assessment
title_short Comparative Study on the Distribution of Essential, Non-Essential Toxic, and Other Elements across Trophic Levels in Various Edible Aquatic Organisms in Sri Lanka and Dietary Human Risk Assessment
title_sort comparative study on the distribution of essential, non-essential toxic, and other elements across trophic levels in various edible aquatic organisms in sri lanka and dietary human risk assessment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36287865
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10100585
work_keys_str_mv AT wickramaarachchigeanuraupasantakumara comparativestudyonthedistributionofessentialnonessentialtoxicandotherelementsacrosstrophiclevelsinvariousedibleaquaticorganismsinsrilankaanddietaryhumanriskassessment
AT gurugekeerthis comparativestudyonthedistributionofessentialnonessentialtoxicandotherelementsacrosstrophiclevelsinvariousedibleaquaticorganismsinsrilankaanddietaryhumanriskassessment
AT tanihinako comparativestudyonthedistributionofessentialnonessentialtoxicandotherelementsacrosstrophiclevelsinvariousedibleaquaticorganismsinsrilankaanddietaryhumanriskassessment
AT dharmaratnetilaksiri comparativestudyonthedistributionofessentialnonessentialtoxicandotherelementsacrosstrophiclevelsinvariousedibleaquaticorganismsinsrilankaanddietaryhumanriskassessment
AT kumaramarappulligep comparativestudyonthedistributionofessentialnonessentialtoxicandotherelementsacrosstrophiclevelsinvariousedibleaquaticorganismsinsrilankaanddietaryhumanriskassessment
AT niizumayasuaki comparativestudyonthedistributionofessentialnonessentialtoxicandotherelementsacrosstrophiclevelsinvariousedibleaquaticorganismsinsrilankaanddietaryhumanriskassessment
AT ohuratakeshi comparativestudyonthedistributionofessentialnonessentialtoxicandotherelementsacrosstrophiclevelsinvariousedibleaquaticorganismsinsrilankaanddietaryhumanriskassessment