Cargando…
A Hybrid Intelligent Simulation System for Building IoT Networks: Performance Comparison of Different Router Replacement Methods for WMNs Considering Stadium Distribution of IoT Devices
As the Internet of Things (IoT) devices and applications proliferate, it becomes increasingly important to design robust networks that can continue to meet user demands at a high level. Wireless local area networks (WLANs) can be a good choice as IoT infrastructure when high throughput is required....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36298078 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22207727 |
_version_ | 1784819717285871616 |
---|---|
author | Barolli, Admir Sakamoto, Shinji Bylykbashi, Kevin Barolli, Leonard |
author_facet | Barolli, Admir Sakamoto, Shinji Bylykbashi, Kevin Barolli, Leonard |
author_sort | Barolli, Admir |
collection | PubMed |
description | As the Internet of Things (IoT) devices and applications proliferate, it becomes increasingly important to design robust networks that can continue to meet user demands at a high level. Wireless local area networks (WLANs) can be a good choice as IoT infrastructure when high throughput is required. On the other hand, wireless mesh networks (WMNs), which are WLANs with mesh topology following the IEEE802.11s standard, have many advantages compared to conventional WLANs. Nevertheless, there are some problems that need solutions. One of them is the node placement problem. In this work, we propose and implement a hybrid intelligent system that solves this problem by determining the position of mesh nodes by maximizing the mesh connectivity and the coverage of IoT devices. The system is based on particle swarm optimization (PSO), simulated annealing (SA), and distributed genetic algorithm (DGA). We compare the performance of three router replacement methods: constriction method (CM), random inertia weight method (RIWM), and rational decrement of Vmax method (RDVM). The simulation results show that RIWM achieves better performance compared to CM and RDVM because it achieves the highest connectivity while covering more clients than the other two methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9612208 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96122082022-10-28 A Hybrid Intelligent Simulation System for Building IoT Networks: Performance Comparison of Different Router Replacement Methods for WMNs Considering Stadium Distribution of IoT Devices Barolli, Admir Sakamoto, Shinji Bylykbashi, Kevin Barolli, Leonard Sensors (Basel) Article As the Internet of Things (IoT) devices and applications proliferate, it becomes increasingly important to design robust networks that can continue to meet user demands at a high level. Wireless local area networks (WLANs) can be a good choice as IoT infrastructure when high throughput is required. On the other hand, wireless mesh networks (WMNs), which are WLANs with mesh topology following the IEEE802.11s standard, have many advantages compared to conventional WLANs. Nevertheless, there are some problems that need solutions. One of them is the node placement problem. In this work, we propose and implement a hybrid intelligent system that solves this problem by determining the position of mesh nodes by maximizing the mesh connectivity and the coverage of IoT devices. The system is based on particle swarm optimization (PSO), simulated annealing (SA), and distributed genetic algorithm (DGA). We compare the performance of three router replacement methods: constriction method (CM), random inertia weight method (RIWM), and rational decrement of Vmax method (RDVM). The simulation results show that RIWM achieves better performance compared to CM and RDVM because it achieves the highest connectivity while covering more clients than the other two methods. MDPI 2022-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9612208/ /pubmed/36298078 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22207727 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Barolli, Admir Sakamoto, Shinji Bylykbashi, Kevin Barolli, Leonard A Hybrid Intelligent Simulation System for Building IoT Networks: Performance Comparison of Different Router Replacement Methods for WMNs Considering Stadium Distribution of IoT Devices |
title | A Hybrid Intelligent Simulation System for Building IoT Networks: Performance Comparison of Different Router Replacement Methods for WMNs Considering Stadium Distribution of IoT Devices |
title_full | A Hybrid Intelligent Simulation System for Building IoT Networks: Performance Comparison of Different Router Replacement Methods for WMNs Considering Stadium Distribution of IoT Devices |
title_fullStr | A Hybrid Intelligent Simulation System for Building IoT Networks: Performance Comparison of Different Router Replacement Methods for WMNs Considering Stadium Distribution of IoT Devices |
title_full_unstemmed | A Hybrid Intelligent Simulation System for Building IoT Networks: Performance Comparison of Different Router Replacement Methods for WMNs Considering Stadium Distribution of IoT Devices |
title_short | A Hybrid Intelligent Simulation System for Building IoT Networks: Performance Comparison of Different Router Replacement Methods for WMNs Considering Stadium Distribution of IoT Devices |
title_sort | hybrid intelligent simulation system for building iot networks: performance comparison of different router replacement methods for wmns considering stadium distribution of iot devices |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36298078 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22207727 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barolliadmir ahybridintelligentsimulationsystemforbuildingiotnetworksperformancecomparisonofdifferentrouterreplacementmethodsforwmnsconsideringstadiumdistributionofiotdevices AT sakamotoshinji ahybridintelligentsimulationsystemforbuildingiotnetworksperformancecomparisonofdifferentrouterreplacementmethodsforwmnsconsideringstadiumdistributionofiotdevices AT bylykbashikevin ahybridintelligentsimulationsystemforbuildingiotnetworksperformancecomparisonofdifferentrouterreplacementmethodsforwmnsconsideringstadiumdistributionofiotdevices AT barollileonard ahybridintelligentsimulationsystemforbuildingiotnetworksperformancecomparisonofdifferentrouterreplacementmethodsforwmnsconsideringstadiumdistributionofiotdevices AT barolliadmir hybridintelligentsimulationsystemforbuildingiotnetworksperformancecomparisonofdifferentrouterreplacementmethodsforwmnsconsideringstadiumdistributionofiotdevices AT sakamotoshinji hybridintelligentsimulationsystemforbuildingiotnetworksperformancecomparisonofdifferentrouterreplacementmethodsforwmnsconsideringstadiumdistributionofiotdevices AT bylykbashikevin hybridintelligentsimulationsystemforbuildingiotnetworksperformancecomparisonofdifferentrouterreplacementmethodsforwmnsconsideringstadiumdistributionofiotdevices AT barollileonard hybridintelligentsimulationsystemforbuildingiotnetworksperformancecomparisonofdifferentrouterreplacementmethodsforwmnsconsideringstadiumdistributionofiotdevices |