Cargando…
Team debriefing in the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of a hospital-wide clinical event debriefing program and a novel qualitative model to analyze debriefing content
BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers faced unique challenges during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic which necessitated rapid adaptation. Clinical event debriefings (CEDs) are one tool that teams can use to reflect after events and identify opportunities for improving their performance and their...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36303254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00226-z |
_version_ | 1784819815496548352 |
---|---|
author | Welch-Horan, Thomas B. Mullan, Paul C. Momin, Zobiya Eggers, Jeannie Lawrence, Julia B. Lichliter, Royanne L. Doughty, Cara B. |
author_facet | Welch-Horan, Thomas B. Mullan, Paul C. Momin, Zobiya Eggers, Jeannie Lawrence, Julia B. Lichliter, Royanne L. Doughty, Cara B. |
author_sort | Welch-Horan, Thomas B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers faced unique challenges during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic which necessitated rapid adaptation. Clinical event debriefings (CEDs) are one tool that teams can use to reflect after events and identify opportunities for improving their performance and their processes. There are few reports of how teams have used CEDs in the COVID-19 pandemic. Our aim is to explore the issues discussed during COVID-19 CEDs and propose a framework model for qualitatively analyzing CEDs. METHODS: This was a descriptive, qualitative study of a hospital-wide CED program at a quaternary children’s hospital between March and July 2020. CEDs were in-person, team-led, voluntary, scripted sessions using the Debriefing in Suspected COVID-19 to Encourage Reflection and Team Learning (DISCOVER-TooL). Debriefing content was qualitatively analyzed using constant comparative coding with an integrated deductive and inductive approach. A novel conceptual framework was proposed for understanding how debriefing content can be employed at various levels in a health system for learning and improvement. RESULTS: Thirty-one debriefings were performed and analyzed. Debriefings had a median of 7 debriefing participants, lasted a median of 10 min, and were associated with multiple systems-based process improvements. Fourteen themes and 25 subthemes were identified and categorized into a novel Input-Mediator-Output-Input Debriefing (IMOID) model. The most common themes included communication, coordination, situational awareness, team member roles, and clinical standards. CONCLUSIONS: Teams identified diverse issues in their debriefing discussions related to areas of high performance and opportunities for improvement in their care of COVID-19 patients. This model may help healthcare systems to understand how CED tools can be used to accelerate organizational learning to promote safety and improve outcomes in changing clinical environments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41077-022-00226-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9612619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96126192022-10-28 Team debriefing in the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of a hospital-wide clinical event debriefing program and a novel qualitative model to analyze debriefing content Welch-Horan, Thomas B. Mullan, Paul C. Momin, Zobiya Eggers, Jeannie Lawrence, Julia B. Lichliter, Royanne L. Doughty, Cara B. Adv Simul (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers faced unique challenges during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic which necessitated rapid adaptation. Clinical event debriefings (CEDs) are one tool that teams can use to reflect after events and identify opportunities for improving their performance and their processes. There are few reports of how teams have used CEDs in the COVID-19 pandemic. Our aim is to explore the issues discussed during COVID-19 CEDs and propose a framework model for qualitatively analyzing CEDs. METHODS: This was a descriptive, qualitative study of a hospital-wide CED program at a quaternary children’s hospital between March and July 2020. CEDs were in-person, team-led, voluntary, scripted sessions using the Debriefing in Suspected COVID-19 to Encourage Reflection and Team Learning (DISCOVER-TooL). Debriefing content was qualitatively analyzed using constant comparative coding with an integrated deductive and inductive approach. A novel conceptual framework was proposed for understanding how debriefing content can be employed at various levels in a health system for learning and improvement. RESULTS: Thirty-one debriefings were performed and analyzed. Debriefings had a median of 7 debriefing participants, lasted a median of 10 min, and were associated with multiple systems-based process improvements. Fourteen themes and 25 subthemes were identified and categorized into a novel Input-Mediator-Output-Input Debriefing (IMOID) model. The most common themes included communication, coordination, situational awareness, team member roles, and clinical standards. CONCLUSIONS: Teams identified diverse issues in their debriefing discussions related to areas of high performance and opportunities for improvement in their care of COVID-19 patients. This model may help healthcare systems to understand how CED tools can be used to accelerate organizational learning to promote safety and improve outcomes in changing clinical environments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41077-022-00226-z. BioMed Central 2022-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9612619/ /pubmed/36303254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00226-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Welch-Horan, Thomas B. Mullan, Paul C. Momin, Zobiya Eggers, Jeannie Lawrence, Julia B. Lichliter, Royanne L. Doughty, Cara B. Team debriefing in the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of a hospital-wide clinical event debriefing program and a novel qualitative model to analyze debriefing content |
title | Team debriefing in the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of a hospital-wide clinical event debriefing program and a novel qualitative model to analyze debriefing content |
title_full | Team debriefing in the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of a hospital-wide clinical event debriefing program and a novel qualitative model to analyze debriefing content |
title_fullStr | Team debriefing in the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of a hospital-wide clinical event debriefing program and a novel qualitative model to analyze debriefing content |
title_full_unstemmed | Team debriefing in the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of a hospital-wide clinical event debriefing program and a novel qualitative model to analyze debriefing content |
title_short | Team debriefing in the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of a hospital-wide clinical event debriefing program and a novel qualitative model to analyze debriefing content |
title_sort | team debriefing in the covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of a hospital-wide clinical event debriefing program and a novel qualitative model to analyze debriefing content |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36303254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00226-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT welchhoranthomasb teamdebriefinginthecovid19pandemicaqualitativestudyofahospitalwideclinicaleventdebriefingprogramandanovelqualitativemodeltoanalyzedebriefingcontent AT mullanpaulc teamdebriefinginthecovid19pandemicaqualitativestudyofahospitalwideclinicaleventdebriefingprogramandanovelqualitativemodeltoanalyzedebriefingcontent AT mominzobiya teamdebriefinginthecovid19pandemicaqualitativestudyofahospitalwideclinicaleventdebriefingprogramandanovelqualitativemodeltoanalyzedebriefingcontent AT eggersjeannie teamdebriefinginthecovid19pandemicaqualitativestudyofahospitalwideclinicaleventdebriefingprogramandanovelqualitativemodeltoanalyzedebriefingcontent AT lawrencejuliab teamdebriefinginthecovid19pandemicaqualitativestudyofahospitalwideclinicaleventdebriefingprogramandanovelqualitativemodeltoanalyzedebriefingcontent AT lichliterroyannel teamdebriefinginthecovid19pandemicaqualitativestudyofahospitalwideclinicaleventdebriefingprogramandanovelqualitativemodeltoanalyzedebriefingcontent AT doughtycarab teamdebriefinginthecovid19pandemicaqualitativestudyofahospitalwideclinicaleventdebriefingprogramandanovelqualitativemodeltoanalyzedebriefingcontent |