Cargando…
Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding
Welsh immunodeficient patients on immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) who were considered high risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were directed to shield. Consequently, patients receiving hospital-based intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) quickly transitioned to home-based self-...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36165464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0000000000000864 |
_version_ | 1784819829028421632 |
---|---|
author | Morgan, Clare Jolles, Stephen Ponsford, Mark J. Evans, Kimberly Carne, Emily |
author_facet | Morgan, Clare Jolles, Stephen Ponsford, Mark J. Evans, Kimberly Carne, Emily |
author_sort | Morgan, Clare |
collection | PubMed |
description | Welsh immunodeficient patients on immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) who were considered high risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were directed to shield. Consequently, patients receiving hospital-based intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) quickly transitioned to home-based self-administered subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg). This evaluation aimed to assess patients’ perceptions and experiences and laboratory outcomes of emergency IgRT transition during COVID-19. RECENT FINDINGS: A quick transition from in-hospital IVIg to home-based rapid push SCIg is achievable, however, patient IgRT administration preference remains key outside of emergency shielding measures. SUMMARY: Subjective self-reported experiences (n = 23) and objective immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration (n = 28) assessments were prospectively collected from patients pre/post-IgRT switch. In total, 41/55 (75%) patients transitioned from IVIg to rapid push SCIg and all completed training to self-administer subcutaneously within 24 days. Twenty-two percent (n = 5) of patients preferred SCIg and 35% (n = 8) wanted to return to hospital-based IVIg at 6 weeks post-transition. Mean IgG levels were similar pre vs. post-SCIg switch (10.3 g/l vs. 10.6 g/l, respectively). Patients reported greater infection anxiety during COVID-19 and adapted behaviours to mitigate risk. Although a third of patients wished to return to IVIg following cessation of shielding, over time the percentage electing to remain on SCIg rose from 22% to 59%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9612677 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96126772022-11-04 Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding Morgan, Clare Jolles, Stephen Ponsford, Mark J. Evans, Kimberly Carne, Emily Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol PRIMARY IMMUNE DEFICIENCY DISEASE: Edited by M. Teresa de la Morena and Stephen Jolles Welsh immunodeficient patients on immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) who were considered high risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were directed to shield. Consequently, patients receiving hospital-based intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) quickly transitioned to home-based self-administered subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg). This evaluation aimed to assess patients’ perceptions and experiences and laboratory outcomes of emergency IgRT transition during COVID-19. RECENT FINDINGS: A quick transition from in-hospital IVIg to home-based rapid push SCIg is achievable, however, patient IgRT administration preference remains key outside of emergency shielding measures. SUMMARY: Subjective self-reported experiences (n = 23) and objective immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration (n = 28) assessments were prospectively collected from patients pre/post-IgRT switch. In total, 41/55 (75%) patients transitioned from IVIg to rapid push SCIg and all completed training to self-administer subcutaneously within 24 days. Twenty-two percent (n = 5) of patients preferred SCIg and 35% (n = 8) wanted to return to hospital-based IVIg at 6 weeks post-transition. Mean IgG levels were similar pre vs. post-SCIg switch (10.3 g/l vs. 10.6 g/l, respectively). Patients reported greater infection anxiety during COVID-19 and adapted behaviours to mitigate risk. Although a third of patients wished to return to IVIg following cessation of shielding, over time the percentage electing to remain on SCIg rose from 22% to 59%. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12 2022-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9612677/ /pubmed/36165464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0000000000000864 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | PRIMARY IMMUNE DEFICIENCY DISEASE: Edited by M. Teresa de la Morena and Stephen Jolles Morgan, Clare Jolles, Stephen Ponsford, Mark J. Evans, Kimberly Carne, Emily Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding |
title | Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding |
title_full | Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding |
title_fullStr | Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding |
title_full_unstemmed | Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding |
title_short | Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding |
title_sort | immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding |
topic | PRIMARY IMMUNE DEFICIENCY DISEASE: Edited by M. Teresa de la Morena and Stephen Jolles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36165464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0000000000000864 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morganclare immunodeficientpatientexperienceofemergencyswitchfromintravenoustorapidpushsubcutaneousimmunoglobulinreplacementtherapyduringcoronavirusdisease2019shielding AT jollesstephen immunodeficientpatientexperienceofemergencyswitchfromintravenoustorapidpushsubcutaneousimmunoglobulinreplacementtherapyduringcoronavirusdisease2019shielding AT ponsfordmarkj immunodeficientpatientexperienceofemergencyswitchfromintravenoustorapidpushsubcutaneousimmunoglobulinreplacementtherapyduringcoronavirusdisease2019shielding AT evanskimberly immunodeficientpatientexperienceofemergencyswitchfromintravenoustorapidpushsubcutaneousimmunoglobulinreplacementtherapyduringcoronavirusdisease2019shielding AT carneemily immunodeficientpatientexperienceofemergencyswitchfromintravenoustorapidpushsubcutaneousimmunoglobulinreplacementtherapyduringcoronavirusdisease2019shielding |