Cargando…

Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding

Welsh immunodeficient patients on immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) who were considered high risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were directed to shield. Consequently, patients receiving hospital-based intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) quickly transitioned to home-based self-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morgan, Clare, Jolles, Stephen, Ponsford, Mark J., Evans, Kimberly, Carne, Emily
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36165464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0000000000000864
_version_ 1784819829028421632
author Morgan, Clare
Jolles, Stephen
Ponsford, Mark J.
Evans, Kimberly
Carne, Emily
author_facet Morgan, Clare
Jolles, Stephen
Ponsford, Mark J.
Evans, Kimberly
Carne, Emily
author_sort Morgan, Clare
collection PubMed
description Welsh immunodeficient patients on immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) who were considered high risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were directed to shield. Consequently, patients receiving hospital-based intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) quickly transitioned to home-based self-administered subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg). This evaluation aimed to assess patients’ perceptions and experiences and laboratory outcomes of emergency IgRT transition during COVID-19. RECENT FINDINGS: A quick transition from in-hospital IVIg to home-based rapid push SCIg is achievable, however, patient IgRT administration preference remains key outside of emergency shielding measures. SUMMARY: Subjective self-reported experiences (n = 23) and objective immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration (n = 28) assessments were prospectively collected from patients pre/post-IgRT switch. In total, 41/55 (75%) patients transitioned from IVIg to rapid push SCIg and all completed training to self-administer subcutaneously within 24 days. Twenty-two percent (n = 5) of patients preferred SCIg and 35% (n = 8) wanted to return to hospital-based IVIg at 6 weeks post-transition. Mean IgG levels were similar pre vs. post-SCIg switch (10.3 g/l vs. 10.6 g/l, respectively). Patients reported greater infection anxiety during COVID-19 and adapted behaviours to mitigate risk. Although a third of patients wished to return to IVIg following cessation of shielding, over time the percentage electing to remain on SCIg rose from 22% to 59%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9612677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96126772022-11-04 Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding Morgan, Clare Jolles, Stephen Ponsford, Mark J. Evans, Kimberly Carne, Emily Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol PRIMARY IMMUNE DEFICIENCY DISEASE: Edited by M. Teresa de la Morena and Stephen Jolles Welsh immunodeficient patients on immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) who were considered high risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were directed to shield. Consequently, patients receiving hospital-based intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) quickly transitioned to home-based self-administered subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg). This evaluation aimed to assess patients’ perceptions and experiences and laboratory outcomes of emergency IgRT transition during COVID-19. RECENT FINDINGS: A quick transition from in-hospital IVIg to home-based rapid push SCIg is achievable, however, patient IgRT administration preference remains key outside of emergency shielding measures. SUMMARY: Subjective self-reported experiences (n = 23) and objective immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration (n = 28) assessments were prospectively collected from patients pre/post-IgRT switch. In total, 41/55 (75%) patients transitioned from IVIg to rapid push SCIg and all completed training to self-administer subcutaneously within 24 days. Twenty-two percent (n = 5) of patients preferred SCIg and 35% (n = 8) wanted to return to hospital-based IVIg at 6 weeks post-transition. Mean IgG levels were similar pre vs. post-SCIg switch (10.3 g/l vs. 10.6 g/l, respectively). Patients reported greater infection anxiety during COVID-19 and adapted behaviours to mitigate risk. Although a third of patients wished to return to IVIg following cessation of shielding, over time the percentage electing to remain on SCIg rose from 22% to 59%. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12 2022-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9612677/ /pubmed/36165464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0000000000000864 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle PRIMARY IMMUNE DEFICIENCY DISEASE: Edited by M. Teresa de la Morena and Stephen Jolles
Morgan, Clare
Jolles, Stephen
Ponsford, Mark J.
Evans, Kimberly
Carne, Emily
Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding
title Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding
title_full Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding
title_fullStr Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding
title_full_unstemmed Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding
title_short Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding
title_sort immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding
topic PRIMARY IMMUNE DEFICIENCY DISEASE: Edited by M. Teresa de la Morena and Stephen Jolles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36165464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0000000000000864
work_keys_str_mv AT morganclare immunodeficientpatientexperienceofemergencyswitchfromintravenoustorapidpushsubcutaneousimmunoglobulinreplacementtherapyduringcoronavirusdisease2019shielding
AT jollesstephen immunodeficientpatientexperienceofemergencyswitchfromintravenoustorapidpushsubcutaneousimmunoglobulinreplacementtherapyduringcoronavirusdisease2019shielding
AT ponsfordmarkj immunodeficientpatientexperienceofemergencyswitchfromintravenoustorapidpushsubcutaneousimmunoglobulinreplacementtherapyduringcoronavirusdisease2019shielding
AT evanskimberly immunodeficientpatientexperienceofemergencyswitchfromintravenoustorapidpushsubcutaneousimmunoglobulinreplacementtherapyduringcoronavirusdisease2019shielding
AT carneemily immunodeficientpatientexperienceofemergencyswitchfromintravenoustorapidpushsubcutaneousimmunoglobulinreplacementtherapyduringcoronavirusdisease2019shielding