Cargando…

A randomized study of intensified antiretroviral treatment monitoring versus standard-of-care for prevention of drug resistance and antiretroviral treatment switch

INTRODUCTION: Standard-of-care antiretroviral treatment (ART) monitoring in low and middle-income countries consists of annual determination of HIV-RNA viral load with confirmatory viral load testing in case of viral rebound. We evaluated an intensified monitoring strategy of three-monthly viral loa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hermans, Lucas E., Ter Heine, Rob, Schuurman, Rob, Tempelman, Hugo A., Burger, David M., Vervoort, Sigrid C.J.M., Deville, Walter L.J.M., De Jong, Dorien, Venter, Willem D.F., Nijhuis, Monique, Wensing, Annemarie M.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35950949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000003349
_version_ 1784819836518400000
author Hermans, Lucas E.
Ter Heine, Rob
Schuurman, Rob
Tempelman, Hugo A.
Burger, David M.
Vervoort, Sigrid C.J.M.
Deville, Walter L.J.M.
De Jong, Dorien
Venter, Willem D.F.
Nijhuis, Monique
Wensing, Annemarie M.J.
author_facet Hermans, Lucas E.
Ter Heine, Rob
Schuurman, Rob
Tempelman, Hugo A.
Burger, David M.
Vervoort, Sigrid C.J.M.
Deville, Walter L.J.M.
De Jong, Dorien
Venter, Willem D.F.
Nijhuis, Monique
Wensing, Annemarie M.J.
author_sort Hermans, Lucas E.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Standard-of-care antiretroviral treatment (ART) monitoring in low and middle-income countries consists of annual determination of HIV-RNA viral load with confirmatory viral load testing in case of viral rebound. We evaluated an intensified monitoring strategy of three-monthly viral load testing with additional drug exposure and drug resistance testing in case of viral rebound. METHODS: We performed an open-label randomized controlled trial (RCT) at a rural South African healthcare clinic, enrolling adults already receiving or newly initiating first-line ART. During 96 weeks follow-up, intervention participants received three-monthly viral load testing and sequential point-of-care drug exposure testing and DBS-based drug resistance testing in case of rebound above 1000 copies/ml. Control participants received standard-of-care monitoring according to the WHO guidelines. RESULTS: Five hundred one participants were included, of whom 416 (83.0%) were randomized at 24 weeks. Four hundred one participants were available for intention-to-treat analysis. Viral rebound occurred in 9.0% (18/199) of intervention participants and in 11.9% (24/202) of controls (P = 0.445). Time to detection of rebound was 375 days [interquartile range (IQR): 348–515] in intervention participants and 360 days [IQR: 338–464] in controls [hazard ratio: 0.88 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.46–1.66]; P = 0.683]. Duration of viral rebound was 87 days [IQR: 70–110] in intervention participants and 101 days [IQR: 78–213] in controls (P = 0.423). In the control arm, three patients with confirmed failure were switched to second-line ART. In the intervention arm, of three patients with confirmed failure, switch could initially be avoided in two cases. CONCLUSION: Three-monthly viral load testing did not significantly reduce the duration of viraemia when compared with standard-of-care annual viral load testing, providing randomized trial evidence in support of annual viral load monitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9612712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96127122022-11-04 A randomized study of intensified antiretroviral treatment monitoring versus standard-of-care for prevention of drug resistance and antiretroviral treatment switch Hermans, Lucas E. Ter Heine, Rob Schuurman, Rob Tempelman, Hugo A. Burger, David M. Vervoort, Sigrid C.J.M. Deville, Walter L.J.M. De Jong, Dorien Venter, Willem D.F. Nijhuis, Monique Wensing, Annemarie M.J. AIDS Clinical Science INTRODUCTION: Standard-of-care antiretroviral treatment (ART) monitoring in low and middle-income countries consists of annual determination of HIV-RNA viral load with confirmatory viral load testing in case of viral rebound. We evaluated an intensified monitoring strategy of three-monthly viral load testing with additional drug exposure and drug resistance testing in case of viral rebound. METHODS: We performed an open-label randomized controlled trial (RCT) at a rural South African healthcare clinic, enrolling adults already receiving or newly initiating first-line ART. During 96 weeks follow-up, intervention participants received three-monthly viral load testing and sequential point-of-care drug exposure testing and DBS-based drug resistance testing in case of rebound above 1000 copies/ml. Control participants received standard-of-care monitoring according to the WHO guidelines. RESULTS: Five hundred one participants were included, of whom 416 (83.0%) were randomized at 24 weeks. Four hundred one participants were available for intention-to-treat analysis. Viral rebound occurred in 9.0% (18/199) of intervention participants and in 11.9% (24/202) of controls (P = 0.445). Time to detection of rebound was 375 days [interquartile range (IQR): 348–515] in intervention participants and 360 days [IQR: 338–464] in controls [hazard ratio: 0.88 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.46–1.66]; P = 0.683]. Duration of viral rebound was 87 days [IQR: 70–110] in intervention participants and 101 days [IQR: 78–213] in controls (P = 0.423). In the control arm, three patients with confirmed failure were switched to second-line ART. In the intervention arm, of three patients with confirmed failure, switch could initially be avoided in two cases. CONCLUSION: Three-monthly viral load testing did not significantly reduce the duration of viraemia when compared with standard-of-care annual viral load testing, providing randomized trial evidence in support of annual viral load monitoring. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-11-15 2022-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9612712/ /pubmed/35950949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000003349 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Hermans, Lucas E.
Ter Heine, Rob
Schuurman, Rob
Tempelman, Hugo A.
Burger, David M.
Vervoort, Sigrid C.J.M.
Deville, Walter L.J.M.
De Jong, Dorien
Venter, Willem D.F.
Nijhuis, Monique
Wensing, Annemarie M.J.
A randomized study of intensified antiretroviral treatment monitoring versus standard-of-care for prevention of drug resistance and antiretroviral treatment switch
title A randomized study of intensified antiretroviral treatment monitoring versus standard-of-care for prevention of drug resistance and antiretroviral treatment switch
title_full A randomized study of intensified antiretroviral treatment monitoring versus standard-of-care for prevention of drug resistance and antiretroviral treatment switch
title_fullStr A randomized study of intensified antiretroviral treatment monitoring versus standard-of-care for prevention of drug resistance and antiretroviral treatment switch
title_full_unstemmed A randomized study of intensified antiretroviral treatment monitoring versus standard-of-care for prevention of drug resistance and antiretroviral treatment switch
title_short A randomized study of intensified antiretroviral treatment monitoring versus standard-of-care for prevention of drug resistance and antiretroviral treatment switch
title_sort randomized study of intensified antiretroviral treatment monitoring versus standard-of-care for prevention of drug resistance and antiretroviral treatment switch
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35950949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000003349
work_keys_str_mv AT hermanslucase arandomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT terheinerob arandomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT schuurmanrob arandomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT tempelmanhugoa arandomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT burgerdavidm arandomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT vervoortsigridcjm arandomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT devillewalterljm arandomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT dejongdorien arandomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT venterwillemdf arandomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT nijhuismonique arandomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT wensingannemariemj arandomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT hermanslucase randomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT terheinerob randomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT schuurmanrob randomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT tempelmanhugoa randomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT burgerdavidm randomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT vervoortsigridcjm randomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT devillewalterljm randomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT dejongdorien randomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT venterwillemdf randomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT nijhuismonique randomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch
AT wensingannemariemj randomizedstudyofintensifiedantiretroviraltreatmentmonitoringversusstandardofcareforpreventionofdrugresistanceandantiretroviraltreatmentswitch